文献计量视角下引进人才与本土人才科研能力对比研究——以新材料领域为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (1666 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The imported talents and native talents are the two most important sources of high-level talents,who are the important forces for the development of national science and technology.This research focuses on high-level talents in the field of new materials in China,and selects 12 imported and native talents of the same age.Based on quantitative data analysis,the two types of talents are researched from the three dimensions of international cooperation,scientific research output and scholar influence.It is found that the imported talents had the significant advantages in international cooperation and the number of achievements.In terms of scholar influence,the imported talent group had a higher average H index,while the native talent group had a higher average π index and RCR index.The overall scientific research level of native talents is consistent with that of imported talents.While attracting high-quality overseas talents,China should also actively find native high-level talents and provides them with high-quality scientific research resources and environment.

Key words： Bibliometric Imported talent Native talent Scientific research ability

Received: 21 October 2020

PACS:

G316

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Guilan
	Wang Yunhong
	Jia Jia
	Zheng Wenwen
	Zhao Xiaoyuan

Cite this article:

Zhang Guilan,Wang Yunhong,Jia Jia, et al. Comparative Study on Scientific Research Ability Between Imported Talents and Native Talents from the Perspective of Bibliometric ——Taking the New Material as an Example[J]. , 2021, 2(8): 39-47.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I8/39

[1]孙宪民,姜志温,白连波.我校归国留学人员科研状况分析及其管理[J].研究与发展管理,1989 (3):54-58.
[2]高瑞堂,姜君.浅议归国留学人员在我校教学科研工作中发挥的作用及管理[J].中国林业教育,1993 (S1):28-30.
[3]张君飞,章成伟,朱晓明.1990年以来我校留学回国人员科研情况调查分析[J].中国高等医学教育,1998 (1):23-24+43.
[4]田瑞强,姚长青,潘云涛,等.基于履历数据的海外华人高层次科技人才流动研究:社会网络分析视角[J].图书情报工作,2014,58 (19):92-99.
[5]杨川,龚怡琳,赵然.长期公派出国留学对临床医师科研能力影响分析[J].中华医院管理杂志,2019,35 (8):687-689.
[6]陈代还,段异兵,潘紫燕.二元关系网络对海归科学家产出的影响——以中国 “青年千人计划”为例[J].中国科技论坛,2015 (9):143-147.
[7]金晶.海外经历对我国材料领域高层次科技人才学术产出的影响——从SCI论文角度[D].北京:中国科学技术信息研究所,2011.
[8]钱艳俊,林军,景飞,等.留学经历对科研人员至关重要吗?——以高被引国际论文为例[J].情报资料工作,2018 (5):100-106.
[9]马万华,温剑波.高校教师出国进修效益分析——基于首都高校教师的问卷调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,37 (1):78-86.
[10]杨芳娟,刘云,侯媛媛,等.中国高被引学者的跨国流动特征和影响——基于论文的计量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38 (9):23-37.
[11]JONKERS K,TIJSSEN R.Chinese researchers returning home:impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity[J].Scientometrics,2008,77 (2):309-333.
[12]CAIBANO C,OTAMENDI J,ANDÚJAR Inés.Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis:the case of the Ramóny Cajal programme in Spain[J].Research evaluation,2008,17 (1):17-31.
[13]SU X.Postdoctoral training,departmental prestige and scientists'research productivity[J].The journal of technology transfer,2011,36 (3):275-291.
[14]霍宏伟,肖轶,赵星宇,等.科学领域海外归国与本土高层次人才科研产出比较研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2015,47 (6):10-17.
[15]李燕萍,许颖佳,胡翔. “青年千人计划”入选者的科研产出从何而来——基于扎根理论的研究[J].高等教育研究,2018,39 (8):45-53.
[16]柳卸林,王亚娟,左铠瑞.博士研究生科研产出影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30 (21):144-149.
[17]宋晓欣,马陆亭,赵世奎.教育学科高层次人才成长规律探究——以22位长江学者为例[J].中国高教研究,2018 (3):51-55+87.
[18]张烨.文献计量视角下高层次人才学术成长特征研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.
[19]李文.理工科博士生科研产出影响因素研究[D].南京:南京大学,2015.
[20]王双,赵筱媛,潘云涛,等.学术谱系视角下的科技人才成长研究——以图灵奖人工智能领域获奖者为例[J].情报学报,2018,37 (12):62-70.
[21]PRICE D J S.Little science,big science[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1963.
[22]LINDSEY D.The corrected quality ratio:a composite index of scientific contribution to knowledge[J].Social studies of science,1978,8 (3):349-354.[23]ELLWEIN L B,KHACHAB M,WALDMAN R H.Assessing research productivity:evaluating journal publication across academic departments[J].Academic medicine journal of the association of American medical colleges,1989,64 (6):319-25.
[24]VINKLER P.Evaluation of the publication activity of research teams by means of scientometric indicators[J].Current science,2000,79 (5):602-612.
[25]TRUEBA F J,HÉCTOR Guerrero.A robust formula to credit authors for their publications[J].Scentometrics,2004,60 (2):181-204.
[26]张勤.多维度量化科研人员影响力的指标——EMC指数[J].情报杂志,2018,37 (2):122-128.
[27]SOMBATSOMPOP N,MARKPIN T,YOCHAI W.et al.An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using impact factor point average (IFPA)index:Thailand case study[J].Scientometrics,2005,65,293-305.
[28]刘雪梅,刘艳民.EM指数及其相关指数用于科研人员评价研究[J].情报杂志,2018,37 (2):129-134.
[29]刘智群,李颖,安凤妹.科学计量指标在科研人员评价中应用[J].科技管理研究,2011,31 (14):72-75
[30]VAN Raan,ANTHONY F J.Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups[J].Scientometrics,2006,67:491-502.
[31]TRUEBA F J,GUERRERO H.A robust formula to credit authors for their publications[J].Scientometrics,2004,60,181-204.
[32]HIRSCH J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America,2005,102 (46):16569-16572.
[33]VINKLER P.The π v-index:a new indicator to characterize the impact of journals[J]Scientometrics,2010,82,461-475.
[34]梁剑莹,安宁.产学研合作对广东高校高层次科研能力的影响研究[J].科技管理研究,2016 (8):98-102.