|
|
Risk or Stability Analysis on the Heterogeneity of Science and Technology Finance |
He Jian1, Zheng Zhiyong1, Li Feng2, Zhang Mengting1 |
1. School of Economics and Management,Shihezi University,Shihezi 832000,China; 2. School of Business Administration,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100026,China |
|
|
Abstract The development of science and technology finance is a close combination of science innovation and economic development,which may have risks while promoting steady economic development.This paper chooses a structural vector autoregressive model with time-varying parameters (SV-TVP-SVAR)to empirically test the direct and indirect channels through which the development of science and technology finance affects economic stability in China from 1998 to 2018,and takes into account the immediate effects caused by important reforms in the development history of science and technology finance.The results of the study show that,firstly,in the direct transmission channel of “the development of science and technology finance affects economic stability”,the heterogeneous period effects differ significantly.The difference is between the boom and the later stages of the crisis,where science nd technology finance has a positive effect on economic stability,and the crisis period has a worsening effect.Secondly,in the indirect transmission channel where systemic finance risk is the mediating variable,the impact of science and technology finance on risk generates heterogeneous changes in effects over the lag period,while the transmission of risk to economic stability is characterized by volatile deterioration,suggesting the existence of impediments to long-term transmission channels.Finally,through the observation of different development points of science and technology finance,it is found that promoting the scale development of science and technology finance is more effective in stabilizing the economy and preventing risks than expanding financing channels (the establishment of the New Third Board)and relying solely on financial support.Therefore,science and technology finance in the broadening of the capital market multiple financing models at the same time,to prevent the possibility of corporate default risk,to unblock the good channel from science and technology to the economy.
|
Received: 13 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1]朱鸿鸣,赵昌文,付剑峰.中国科技贷款三十年:演进规律与政策建议[J].中国科技论坛,2012 (7):20-26+31. [2]严岿,吴光俊.所有制歧视约束下的中国科技金融效率研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36 (2):28-35. [3]汪泉,曹阳.科技金融信用风险的识别、度量与控制[J].金融论坛,2014,19 (4):60-64. [4]AHLSTROM D,BRUTON G D.Venture capital in emerging economies:networks and institutional change[J].Entrepreneurship theory & practice,2018,30 (2):299-320. [5]房汉廷.科技金融本质探析[J].中国科技论坛,2015 (5):5-10. [6]DUFFEY R B,SAULL J W.Risk assessment:dynamic events and financial risks [M].Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons,2008. [7]揭红兰.科技金融、科技创新对区域经济发展的传导路径与实证检验[J].统计与决策,2020,36 (1):66-71. [8]张芷若,谷国锋.科技金融与科技创新耦合协调度的空间格局分析[J].经济地理,2019,39 (4):50-58. [9]张俊芳,郭戎.我国科技成果转化的现状分析及政策建议[J].中国软科学,2010 (2):137-141+165. [10]张俊芳,郭戎.中国风险投资发展的演进、现状与未来展望[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2016,31 (9):34-43. [11]王文轲,赵昌文.科技银行信贷动态决策与风险管理研究——以上海浦东科技银行为例[J].华东经济管理,2011,25 (6):7-10. [12]方先明,苏晓珺.科技型企业融资风险:来源、评价与控制[J].科技管理研究,2015,35 (21):62-67. [13]郭娜,祁帆,张宁.我国系统性金融风险指数的度量与监测[J].财经科学,2018 (2):1-14. [14]武思涵.科技金融视域下商业银行盈利能力提升的实施路径研究[J].商业经济,2020 (1):184-185. [15]CHEMMANUR T J,FULGHIERI P.Entrepreneurial finance and innovation:an introduction and agenda for future research [J].Review of financial studies,2014,27 (1):1-19. [16]GORODNICHENKO Y,SVEJNAR J,TERRELL K.Does foreign entry spur innovation[J].Social science electronic publishing,2015,12 (3):4-13. [17]刘晓星,方琳.系统性风险与宏观经济稳定:影响机制及其实证检验[J].北京工商大学学报 (社会科学版),2014,29 (5):65-77. [18]GATTI D,GALLEGATI M,GREENWALD B,et al.The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network[J].Journal of economic dynamics and control,2010,34 (9):1627-1650. [19]BERNANKE B,GERTLER M,GILCHRISTil S.The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework[J].Social science electronic publishing.1999,17 (1):1341-1393. [20]黄瑞芬,杜绪沅.基于DEA方法的我国沿海各省科技金融绩效评价[J].金融发展研究,2015 (4):35-39. [21]马玉林,马运鹏,彭文博.中国科技金融效率的区域差异及动态演进分析[J].宏观经济研究,2020 (7):124-137. [22]许汝俊,龙子午,姚逍遥.基于DEA-Malmquist指数法的科技金融发展效率评价研究——以长江经济带为例[J].科技管理研究,2015,35 (13):188-191. [23]杨洋,李南妮.科技金融生态滞后[J].中国金融,2016 (21):100-127. |
|
|
|