|
|
|
| Can High-Income Countries Produce High Innovation Performance? ——Fuzzy-Sets Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 118 Countries and Regions |
| Liu Zhongyan, Cao Pengpeng, Tu Yanhong |
| School of Business,Hunan University of Technology,Zhuzhou 412000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Using 118 countries and regions as research samples,integrating five indicators such as business environment,human capital,infrastructure level,information transparency and legal regulations,and using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA)to reveal the conditions that lead to innovation differences in countries with the same income level.At the same time,it will conduct exploratory research on the path of high and non-high innovation in countries with different levels of income.The paper draws the following conclusions.First,high-income countries may not produce high innovation performance.For high-income countries that produce high innovation performance,there is one configuration path,it is free market type;For middle-income countries,there are two configuration paths,they are mechanism-guided type and government-controlled type;For low-income countries,there are two configuration paths,namely market environment type and human capital type.Second,regardless of whether high-income,middle-income or low-income countries,they all need to strive to improve their market environment in order to achieve higher innovation performance.Third,the reasons for the difference in innovation performance of high-income,middle-income and low-income countries are asymmetric,and the path that causes non-high innovation performance is not the opposite of the path of high innovation performance.
|
|
Received: 31 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]孙莹.中国与主要创新型国家企业研发投资结构比较[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (6):159-170.
[2]FREEMAN C.Technology policy and economic performance:lessons from Japan[M].London:Pinter Publishers,1987:30-43.
[3]LUNDVALL B A.National systems of innovation:toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning[M].New York:Printer Publishers Ltd,1992:43-55.
[4]NIOSI J,BELLON B.The global interdependence of national innovation systems:evidence,limits,and implications[J].Technology in society,1994,16 (2):173-197.
[5]程豪.全球化国家科技创新能力综合评价指数统计模型——基于互联网科技统计视阈[J].调研世界,2020 (6):25-31.
[6]李路路,冯泽鲲,唐丽娜.阶层结构变革与国家治理体系创新[J].社会学评论,2020,8 (3):63-71.
[7]黄江,陈劲.和平创新视角对国家创新体系的理论补充[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39 (12):3-16.
[8]王溯.基于公-私部门互动机制的丹麦国家创新体系[J].科技管理研究,2018,38 (6):6-11.
[9]张杨,汤凌冰,金培振.金砖国家创新能力测度与影响因素研究[J].中国软科学,2015 (6):148-157.
[10]FURMAN J L.The determinants of national innovative capacity[J].Research policy,2000,31 (6):899-933.
[11]FURMAN J L,HAYES R.Catching up or standing still:national innovative productivity among “follower”countries,1978-1999[J].Research policy,2004,33 (9):1329-1354.
[12]吕新军,胡晓绵.到底是什么阻碍了国家创新？——影响国家创新的制度性因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31 (5):115-120.
[13]魏守华.国家创新能力的影响因素——兼评近期中国创新能力演变的特征[J].南京大学学报 (哲学·人文科学·社会科学版),2008 (3):30-36.
[14]郭淡泊,雷家骕,张俊芳,等.国家创新体系效率及影响因素研究——基于DEA-Tobit两步法的分析[J].清华大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2012,27 (2):142-150+160.
[15]潘冬晓,吴杨.美国科技创新制度安排的历史演进及经验启示——基于国家创新系统理论的视角[J].北京工业大学学报 (社会科学版),2019,19 (3):87-93.
[16]涂舒.后发国家创新模式选择:一个综述性理论框架[J].商业研究,2013 (11):169-176.
[17]朱兰.国家创新能力视角下的中等收入转型——基于新结构经济学理论[J].经济与管理研究,2019,40 (12):16-28.
[18]刘云,谭龙,李正风,等.国家创新体系国际化的理论模型及测度实证研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33 (9):1324-1339.
[19]吴晓松.国家创新体系对企业创新能力及创新绩效影响研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2012.
[20]高锡荣,张薇,陈流汀.人力资本:国家自主创新的长期驱动力量——基于日本创新转型的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31 (3):149-155.
[21]NELSON R R,PHELPS E S.Investments in humans,technological diffusion and economic growth[J].American economic review,1996 (65):69-75.
[22]RAGIN C C.The limitations of net-effects thinking[M]//GRIMM H,RIHOUX B.Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis.New York:Springer,2006.
[23]王凤彬,江鸿,王璁.央企集团管控架构的演进:战略决定、制度引致还是路径依赖:一项定性比较分析 (QCA)尝试[J].管理世界,2014 (12):92-114+187-188.
[24]张宝建,段思垚,贾梦宇,等.中国创业孵化失败的构型分析——基于fsQCA的实证检验[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (2):62-71.
[25]刘晓亮,侯凯悦,张洺硕.从地方探索到中央推广:政府创新扩散的影响机制——基于36个清晰集定性比较分析[J].公共管理学报,2019,16 (3):157-167+176.
[26]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167. |
|
|
|
2021, Vol. 2 
