区域科技创新政策目标力及其演变评价——基于广州近16年政策文本的分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (8470 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract From the perspective of goal evaluation in S&T innovation policy,it is necessary to distinguish the three levels of goal ontological evaluation,performance goal evaluation and goal management evaluation.Policy goal capacity evaluation can be an innovative concept in between.By defining its connotation and extension,using a goal expression model acquired from grounded theory and a goal capacity evaluation system established under content analysis,an empirical research was done on the S&T innovation policies of Guangzhou in the past 16 years.It was found that existing policies were not clear about the meaning,scientificity and connection of their changing goals.The goal setting at the city level was obviously affected by the superiors' orientation to it,and the goal's “regulating power”on policy management was not constant in specific periods.Evaluation of goal capacity provides an important basis for the goal system adjustment of S&T innovation policy,brings information inspiration for performance goal evaluation as well as guidance for “symptomatic treatment”in the process of policy implementation.

Key words： S&T innovation policy Evaluation of policy goal capacity Goal expression model Policy goal management Guangzhou

Received: 18 June 2020

PACS:

C939

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Lu Yangfan
	Zheng Fanghui

Cite this article:

Lu Yangfan,Zheng Fanghui. Evaluating the Goal Capacity of Regional S&T Innovation Policy——Based on Guangzhou in the Past 16 Years[J]. , 2021, 2(2): 80-90.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I2/80

[1]欧阳景根.作为政策分析框架的政策基因、政策环境和政策诊疗[J].中国行政管理,2019 (11):86-91.
[2]鄞益奋.公共政策评估:理性主义和建构主义的耦合[J].中国行政管理,2019 (11):92-96.
[3]樊春良.科技政策学的知识构成和体系[J].科学学研究,2017,35 (2):161-169.
[4]MARTIN B R.The evolution of science policy and innovation studies[J].Research policy,2012,41 (7):1219-1239.
[5]王帮俊,朱荣.产学研协同创新政策效力与政策效果评估——基于中国2006—2016年政策文本的量化分析[J].软科学,2019 (3):30-35.
[6]郭本海,陆文茜,王涵,等.基于关键技术链的新能源汽车产业政策分解及政策效力测度[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019 (8):76-86.
[7]丁煌,李晓飞.中国政策执行力研究评估:2003—2012年[J].公共行政评论,2013 (4):130-157.
[8]司林波.基于公共政策过程的政府公信力生成机理研究[J].行政论坛,2013 (6):41-46.
[9]郑方辉,邱佛梅.法治政府绩效评价:目标定位与指标体系[J].政治学研究,2016 (2):67-79.
[10]常旭华,刘永千,刘笑,等.区域科技成果转化政策目标体系与评估——基于上海数据的研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (9):58-68.
[11]翁银娇,马文聪,叶阳平,等.我国LED产业政策的演进特征、问题和对策——基于政策目标、政策工具和政策力度的三维分析[J].科技管理研究,2018 (3):69-75.
[12]韩柯子,朱晨歌,王红帅.可持续发展目标的内涵、进程与评估——从全球社会政策治理的视角[J].中国海洋大学学报 (社会科学版),2018 (6):72-79.
[13]RÉMI B.Policy-making processes and evaluation tools:S&T indicators[M].// RIGAS A.Encyclopedia of life support systems science.Barcelona (Spain):Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,2009 (2):1-22.
[14]张国兴,张振华.我国节能减排政策目标的有效性分析——基于1052条节能减排政策的研究[J].华东经济管理,2015 (11):88-95.
[15]莫建雷,段宏波,范英,等. 《巴黎协定》中我国能源和气候政策目标:综合评估与政策选择[J].经济研究,2018 (9):168-181.
[16]JON M Z I,FERNANDO J.S.Regional S&T policy evaluation:approaches and methods[EB/OL]. (2006-03-17)[2020-05-12].http://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/10207/1/AC100_1_298-Ref-A95-Jon-Mikel-Zabala.pdf.
[17]ZHANG P.Target interactions and target aspiration level adaptation: how do government leaders tackle the “environment-economy”nexus[J/OL].Public administration review,2020,80(2) :1-11(2020-04-13)[2020-05-14].https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13184.
[18]李学.非理性绩效考评、组织依附与目标置换——一个地方政府微观失范行为的分析框架[J].公共管理研究,2010 (1):105-116.
[19]贺东航,孔繁斌.中国公共政策执行中的政治势能——基于近20年农村林改政策的分析[J].中国社会科学,2019 (4):4-25.
[20]何文盛,何志才,唐序康,等. “一事一议”财政奖补政策绩效偏差及影响因素——基于甘肃省10个县 (区)的质化研究[J].公共管理学报,2018 (2):1-13.
[21]渠敬东.项目制:一种新的国家治理体制[J].中国社会科学,2012 (5):113-130.