研发投入结构对高质量创新的影响——兼论有为政府和有效市场的协同效应

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (7032 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This article explores the effective ways to achieve high-quality innovation from the perspective of R&D input structure adjustment,theoretically analyzes the effects of different R&D inputs on high-quality innovation output and the regulatory mechanism of government support and marketization.Using China's provincial regional international“The application data of the Patent Cooperation Treaty”(PCT)the impact of R&D input structure on high-quality innovation from both the funding and personnel levels has been empirically tested.The study found the followings.①Basic research and applied research both significantly promote high-quality innovation in China,but experimental development has not played the role.②Government support for basic research significantly expands its promotion effect on high-quality innovation,while government supports applied research and the role played by experimental development is very limited.③In areas with high marketization levels,basic research has a greater effect on promoting high-quality innovation output,while applied research and experimental development still have no significant impact.Therefore,in order to achieve high-quality innovation in China,it is necessary to increase investment in basic research and focus on the synergy of promising government and effective market.

Key words： R&D investment structure High-quality innovation Basic research

Received: 30 March 2020

PACS:

F202

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhao Yulin
	Liu Chao
	Gu Junjian

Cite this article:

Zhao Yulin,Liu Chao,Gu Junjian. The Effect of R&D Investment Structure on High-Quality Innovation——Also on the Synergy of Promising Government and Effective Market[J]. , 2021, 2(1): 55-64.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I1/55

[1] 赵玉林,谷军健.中美制造业发展质量的测度与比较研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(12):116-133.
[2] 孙早,许薛璐.前沿技术差距与科学研究的创新效应——基础研究与应用研究谁扮演了更重要的角色[J].中国工业经济,2017(3):5-23.
[3] 辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁,等.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学,2018(10):9-18.
[4] 张军,许庆瑞.知识积累、创新能力与企业成长关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(8):86-95.
[5] PLANK J,DOBLINGER C.The firm-level innovation impact of public R&D funding:evidence from the German renewable energy sector[J].Energy policy,2018,113:430-438.
[6] CALLON M.Is science a public good? Fifth mullins lecture,virginia polytechnic institute,23 march 1993[J].Science,technology,&Human values,1994,19(4):395-424.
[7] 柳卸林,何郁冰.基础研究是中国产业核心技术创新的源泉[J].中国软科学,2011(4):104-117.
[8] TSANG E W K,YIP P S L,TOH M H.The impact of R&D on value added for domestic and foreign firms in a newly industrialized economy[J].International business review,2008,17(4):423-441.
[9] CZARNITZKI D,THORWARTH S.Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries[J].Research policy,2012,41(9):1555-1564.
[10] 黄苹.R&D投资结构增长效应及最优基础研究强度[J].科研管理,2013,34(8):53-57.
[11] KIM H,SHIN J,LEE S.A new approach to efficient ratio:a case of South Korea's research and development investment[J].Journal of engineering and technology management,2019,51:1-9.
[12] 余泳泽.中国区域创新活动的“协同效应”与“挤占效应”——基于创新价值链视角的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(10):37-52.
[13] HANER U E.Innovation quality—a conceptual framework[J].International journal of production economics,2002,80(1):31-37.
[14] YU L,LI H,WANG Z,et al.Technology imports and self-innovation in the context of innovation quality[J].International journal of production economics,2019,214:44-52.
[15] 张东婷,宋傲男,袁红梅.中国传统产业继承对创新质量的影响研究[J].科研管理,2019,40(2):1-11.
[16] 魏浩,连慧君,巫俊.中美贸易摩擦、美国进口冲击与中国企业创新[J].统计研究,2019,36(8):46-59.
[17] 许昊,万迪昉,徐晋.风险投资、区域创新与创新质量甄别[J].科研管理,2017,38(8):27-35.
[18] 唐未兵,傅元海,王展祥.技术创新、技术引进与经济增长方式转变[J].经济研究,2014,49(7):31-43.
[19] 熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].何畏,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1991.
[20] 张杰,高德步,夏胤磊.专利能否促进中国经济增长——基于中国专利资助政策视角的一个解释[J].中国工业经济,2016(1):83-98.
[21] 张杰,郑文平.创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么[J].经济研究,2018,53(5):28-41.
[22] HU A G Z,PNG I P L.Patent rights and economic growth:evidence from cross-country panels of manufacturing industries[J].Oxford economic papers,2013,65(3):675-698.
[23] 温军,张森.经济开放度与中国国际技术创新——基于省际PCT国际专利申请数据的经验研究[J].国际贸易问题,2018(11):120-131.
[24] IWAISAKO T,TANAKA H,FUTAGAMI K.A welfare analysis of global patent protection in a model with endogenous innovation and foreign direct investment[J].European economic review,2011,55(8):1137-1151.
[25] 顾志恒.清华大学美国专利分析与高校海外专利推进策略[J].科研管理,2017,38(1):137-143.
[26] 夏建白.基础研究是中国科学院发展的土壤和驱动力[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(4):427-428.
[27] 生延超,欧阳峣.基础研究还是应用研究:后发大国创新方式及创新领域选择[J].中国科技论坛,2017(10):16-25.
[28] 叶祥松,刘敬.异质性研发、政府支持与中国科技创新困境[J].经济研究,2018,53(9):116-132.
[29] 李永周,高楠鑫,易倩,等.创新网络嵌入与高技术企业研发人员创新绩效关系研究[J].管理科学,2018,31(2):3-19.
[30] 梁镇,李丽.高新技术企业技术研发人员创新成长评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(7):166-171.
[31] 郑颖,张志强,陈云伟,等.IMD世界人才报告解读及中国人才态势分析[J].世界科技研究与发展,2018,40(3):239-248.
[32] KOROGLU B A,ECERAL T O.Human capital and innovation capacity of firms in defense and aviation industry in Ankara[J].Procedia-social and behavioral sciences,2015,195:1583-1592.
[33] 耿晔强,白力芳.人力资本结构高级化、研发强度与制造业全球价值链升级[J].世界经济研究,2019(8):88-102+136.
[34] CASELLI F,COLEMAN II W J.The world technology frontier[J].American economic review,2006,96(3):499-522.
[35] HA J,KIM Y J,LEE J W.Optimal structure of technology adoption and creation:basic versus development research in relation to the distance from the technological frontier[J].Asian economic journal,2009,23(3):373-395.
[36] 王艳涛,崔成.人力资本结构与技术创新模式关系研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2019(6):30-35.
[37] 刘智勇,胡永远,易先忠.异质型人力资本对经济增长的作用机制检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008(4):86-96.
[38] 王文,孙早.基础研究还是应用研究:谁更能促进TFP增长——基于所有制和要素市场扭曲的调节效应分析[J].当代经济科学,2016,38(6):23-33+123.
[39] 资本市场改革课题组.创新驱动高质量发展要深化资本市场改革——兼谈科创板赋能创新发展[J].经济学动态,2019(10):93-100.
[40] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[41] 朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D 投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003(6):45-53.