|
|
|
| Innovation Output and Financial Performance ——The Double-edged Sword Effect of Credit Financing |
| Hai Benlu1, 2, Yang Junxiao1, Yin Ximing3, Li Jizhen4 |
1. Business School, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China;
2. Center for Innovation and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
4. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper takes the firms in Zhongguancun National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone as sample and studies the impact of credit financing on the relationship between innovation output and financial performance, aiming to uncover the “black box”that affects the innovation benefit from the perspective of credit financing.This study finds that innovation output has a significant positive U-shaped impact on financial performance, while credit financing shows a “double-edged sword”moderating effect on the relationship between them.On the one hand, the increase of credit financing shifts the turning point of the positive U-shaped relationship between innovation output and financial performance to the right which indicates the financing structure dominated by credit financing has capital mismatch problems in the process of promoting innovation-driven development, which may deepen the “innovation trap”of firms.On the other hand, credit financing can enhance the steepness and average marginal effect of the positive U-shaped relationship.This indicates that credit financing strengthens the impact of innovation output on financial performance and improves the overall level of business performance.Therefore, deepening the reform of the banking industry and promoting the deep integration of finance and the real economy is strategically essential for cultivating world-class firms and building an innovative country.
|
|
Received: 08 January 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]TEECE D J.Profiting from technological innovation:implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy[J].Research policy, 1986, 15 (6):285-305.
[2]马光荣, 刘明, 杨恩艳.银行授信、信贷紧缩与企业研发[J].金融研究, 2014 (7):76-93.
[3]徐飞.银行信贷与企业创新困境[J].中国工业经济, 2019 (1):119-136.
[4]OPLER T C, TITMAN S.Financial distress and corporate performance[J].Journal of finance, 1994, 49 (3):1015-1040.
[5]DAVID P, OBRIEN J P, YOSHIKAWA T.The implications of debt heterogeneity for R&D investment and firm performance[J].Academy of management journal, 2008, 51 (1):165-181.
[6]刘新同.基于企业生命周期的探索性创新和开发性创新平衡研究[J].河南师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2015, 42 (6):77-80.
[7]胡望斌, 张玉利, 杨俊.同质性还是异质性:创业导向对技术创业团队与新企业绩效关系的调节作用研究[J].管理世界, 2014 (6):92-109+187-188.
[8]姚铮, 马超群, 杨智, 等.制造业企业开放式创新中关键资源对新产品开发风险与市场绩效的影响机理研究[J].中国软科学, 2013 (6):111-118.
[9]HALL B H.The financing of research and development[J].Oxford review of economic policy, 2002, 18 (1):35-51.
[10]潘清泉, 鲁晓玮.创业企业创新投入、高管过度自信对企业绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策, 2017, 34 (1):98-103.
[11]RAJAN R G, ZINGALES L.Financial systems, industrial structure, and growth[J].Oxford review of economic policy, 2001, 17 (4):467-482.
[12]HSU P H, TIAN X, XU Y.Financial development and innovation:cross-country evidence[J].Journal of finance economics, 2014, 112 (1):116-135.
[13]张一林, 龚强, 荣昭.技术创新、股权融资与金融结构转型[J].管理世界, 2016 (11):65-80.
[14]KHAN M K, KALEEM A, ZULFIQAR S, et al.Innovation investment:behaviour of Chinese firms towards financing sources[J].International journal of innovation management, 2019 (1):1-29.
[15]赖黎, 唐芸茜, 夏晓兰, 等.董事高管责任保险降低了企业风险吗？——基于短贷长投和信贷获取的视角[J].管理世界, 2019, 35 (10):160-171.
[16]刘晓光, 苟琴, 姜天予.金融结构、经济波动与经济增长——基于最优产业配置框架的分析[J].管理世界, 2019, 35 (5):29-43+198.
[17]KIM S, LEE H, KIM J.Divergent effects of external financing on technology innovation activity:Korean evidence[J].Technological forecasting & social change, 2016, 106 (5):22-30.
[18]GU Y, MAO C X, TIAN X.Banks'interventions and firms'innovation:evidence from debt covenant violations[J].The journal of law and economics, 2017, 60 (4):637-671.
[19]王满四, 徐朝辉.银行债权治理与公司内部治理间的互动效应研究——基于管理层代理成本的实证分析[J].中国软科学, 2017 (12):100-115.
[20]周煜皓.我国企业创新融资约束结构性特征的表现、成因及治理研究[J].管理世界, 2017 (4):184-185.
[21]张璇, 刘贝贝, 汪婷, 等.信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新[J].经济研究, 2017, 52 (5):161-174.
[22]TIAN L, HAN L, MI B.Bank competition, information specialization and innovation[J].Review of quantitative finance and accounting, 2019 (4):1-25.
[23]邓超, 张恩道, 樊步青, 等.政府补贴、股权结构与中小创新型企业经营绩效研究——基于企业异质性特征的实证检验[J].中国软科学, 2019 (7):184-192.
[24]陈林, 万攀兵, 许莹盈.混合所有制企业的股权结构与创新行为——基于自然实验与断点回归的实证检验[J].管理世界, 2019, 35 (10):186-205.
[25]刘行, 赵健宇, 叶康涛.企业避税、债务融资与债务融资来源——基于所得税征管体制改革的断点回归分析[J].管理世界, 2017 (10):113-129.
[26]梁上坤, 陈冬华.银行贷款决策中的私人效用攫取——基于业务招待费的实证研究[J].金融研究, 2017 (4):112-127.
[27]HAANS R F J, PIETERS C, HE Z L.Thinking about U:theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J].Strategic management journal, 2016, 37 (7):1177-1195.
[28]何熙琼, 尹长萍, 毛洪涛.产业政策对企业投资效率的影响及其作用机制研究——基于银行信贷的中介作用与市场竞争的调节作用[J].南开管理评论, 2016, 19 (5):161-170. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 1 
