|
|
Evaluation of Innovation Ability and Spatial Differentiation of China's Prefecture-Level Cities |
Wang Gongbo1,2,3, Ma Yue4, Xiang Kun1,2,3, Liu Gongyi5 |
1.School of Economics and Resource Management,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China; 2.Capital Institute of Science and Technology Development Strategy,Beijing 100022,China; 3.Beijing Key Lab of Study on Sci-Tech Strategy for Urban Green Development,Beijing 100875,China; 4.Corporate Finance Department,Zhong Chuan Finance Company,Ltd.,Beijing 100044,China; 5.School of Government, Peking University,Beijing 100871,China |
|
|
Abstract China is vigorously implementing the strategy of innovation-driven development,Quantifying the ability to innovation is of great significance for clarifying the status quo and promoting the construction of innovative country.However,the comprehensive measurement of China's innovation capability which is based on the perspective of prefecture-level cities is still lacking.This paper constructs 12 indexes consisting of three aspects(innovation investment,innovation environment and innovation achievements),uses the 2015 data to measure the innovation capabilities of 289 prefecture-level cities in China,and uses exploratory spatial data analysis(ESDA)to examine their spatial differentiation.The results show that,firstly,the innovation ability of prefecture-level cities has a strong correlation with their administrative level,and the prefecture-level cities with the strongest innovation ability are often provincial capitals and sub-provincial cities.Secondly,the innovation ability of prefecture-level cities shows significant spatial differentiation,and the innovation ability generally decreases from the east to the central and western prefecture-level cities.Thirdly,the prefecture-level cities with the strongest innovation capabilities are all located on the eastern coast,mainly in the Yangtze River Delta,the Pearl River Delta and the Bohai Rim region.
|
Received: 06 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]谭俊涛,张平宇,李静.2001—2010年黑龙江省城市创新能力格局与发展过程[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):508-516. [2]段利忠,刘思峰.灰色聚类分析法评价城市创新能力[J].北京工业大学学报,2003,29(4):508-512. [3]李凌月,张啸虎,罗瀛.基于创新产出的城市科技创新空间演化特征分析——以上海市为例[J].城市发展研究,2019,26(6):87-92+33. [4]吕拉昌,何爱,黄茹.基于知识产出的北京城市创新职能[J].地理研究,2014,33(10):1817-1824. [5]易高峰,刘成.江苏省城市创新能力的地区差异及影响因素分析[J].经济地理,2018,38(10):155-162. [6]孙红兵,向刚.城市创新系统的创新综合能力评价[J].经济问题探索,2011(3):97-103. [7]武晓静,杜德斌,肖刚,管明明.长江经济带城市创新能力差异的时空格局演变[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(4):490-499. [8]倪鹏飞,白晶,杨旭.城市创新系统的关键因素及其影响机制——基于全球436个城市数据的结构化方程模型[J].中国工业经济,2011(2):16-25. [9]周灿,曾刚,曹贤忠.中国城市创新网络结构与创新能力研究[J].地理研究,2017,36(7):1297-1308. [10]何舜辉,杜德斌,焦美琪,等.中国地级以上城市创新能力的时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J].地理科学,2017,37(7):1014-1022. [11]吴林海.创新型城市评价指标体系研究综述与展望[J].科技管理研究,2008,28(1):79-81. [12]李向波,李叔涛.基于创新过程的企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].中国软科学,2007(2):139-142. [13]陈劲,陈钰芬.企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):86-91. [14]庞瑞芝,李鹏,李爽,等.区域技术创新网络绩效评价:基于长三角、环渤海技术创新网络的三层次分析[J].产业经济研究,2013(1):70-78. [15]袁永,李妃养,张宏丽.基于创新过程的科技创新政策体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(12):92-98. [16]郭淑芬,裴耀琳.中国内地31省市文化产业创新绩效区域比较——基于过程视角[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(4):31-37. [17]GRILICHES Z.Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J].Bell journal of economics,1979,10(1):92-116. [18]程德俊,赵曙明.高参与工作系统与企业绩效:人力资本专用性和环境动态性的影响[J].管理世界,2006(3):86-93. [19]孙文杰,沈坤荣.人力资本积累与中国制造业技术创新效率的差异性[J].中国工业经济,2009(3):81-91. [20]李平,刘利利.政府研发资助、企业研发投入与中国创新效率[J].科研管理,2017,38(1):21-29. [21]郭玥.政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2018(9):98-116. [22]夏后学,谭清美,白俊红.营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新——来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J].经济研究,2019,54(4):84-98. [23]卢万青,陈万灵.营商环境、技术创新与比较优势的动态变化[J].国际经贸探索,2018,34(11):61-77. [24]高军,吴欣桐,梁琳.创新创业行为的“锁定”与“解锁”[J].湖南社会科学,2016(4):107-110. [25]王兰芳,胡悦.创业投资促进了创新绩效吗?——基于中国企业面板数据的实证检验[J].金融研究,2017(1):177-190. [26]蔡俊亚,党兴华.创业导向与创新绩效:高管团队特征和市场动态性的影响[J].管理科学,2015,28(5):42-53. [27]纪玉俊,李超.创新驱动与产业升级——基于我国省际面板数据的空间计量检验[J].科学学研究,2015,33(11):1651-1659. [28]AHUJA G,KATILA R.Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms:a longitudinal study[J].Strategic management journal,2001,22(3):197-220. [29]陈雨柯.中国创新能力对经济增长影响的实证研究[J].经济问题,2012(2):36-39. [30]李源.广东科技创新对经济增长的驱动效应研究[J].南方经济,2016(11):125-132. [31]章穗,张梅,迟国泰.基于熵权法的科学技术评价模型及其实证研究[J].管理学报,2010,7(1):34-42. [32]REY S J,MONTOURI B D.US regional income convergence:a Spatial econometric perspective[J].Regional studies,1999,33(2):143-156. |
|
|
|