|
|
|
| Equity Analysis of Scientific Popularization Funds Investment in China Based on Gini Coefficient |
| Li Enji1, Li Qun2 |
1.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences ,Beijing 102488,China;
2.Institute of Quantitative & Technical Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Under the background of “Matthew Effect”of science popularization,this paper calculates the Gini coefficient of Chinese popular science funds by means of income share method,and decomposes it according to regional and fund-raising channels,and obtains the sub-Gini coefficient of each group and the marginal effect of the whole Gini coefficient.The research shows that:the average scientific funds in China are different between provinces,but the overall trend is declining,the Gini coefficient is about 0.5.In the region,the Gini coefficient in the eastern region is much higher than that of the Midwest,which is the dominant factor of the overall change,while the central and western regions are relatively close,and the Gini coefficients in the three areas fluctuate in varying degrees,while the Gini coefficients in the eastern regions are declining,but the provincial disparities in the central and western regions show signs of enlargement.From the perspective of financing,the difference between different provinces is very significant,in which the Gini coefficient of government appropriation is the smallest,which dominates the change of the overall Gini coefficient.Increasing the proportion of the government funds and the popularization of popular science funds in the General Popularization fund will help to improve the fairness of the allocation of scientific popularization funds in China
|
|
Received: 27 September 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]李富强,李群.中国科普能力评价报告 (2016—2017)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[2]中国科协.第十次中国公民科学素质调查结果公布[J].科协论坛,2018 (9):62.
[3]佟贺丰.科普投入的国内外对比研究及对策分析[J].科普研究,2006 (4):3-8.
[4]黄丹斌.构建中国特色科普理论的思考和探索——基于新常态下的科普创新[C].北京:第二十二届全国科普理论研讨会暨面向2020的科学传播国际论坛,2015.
[5]中华人民共和国科学技术部政策法规与体制改革司.中国科学技术普及发展报告 (1978—2002)[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002.
[6]佟贺丰,刘润生,张泽玉.地区科普力度评价指标体系构建与分析[J].中国软科学,2008 (12):54-60.
[7]李婷.地区科普能力指标体系的构建及评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2011 (7):12-17.
[8]何丽.企业科普能力指标体系构建[J].科研管理,2015,36 (S1):465-469.
[9]莫扬,荆玉静,刘佳.科技人才科普能力建设机制研究——基于中科院科研院所的调查分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29 (3):359-365.
[10]任嵘嵘,郑念,邢钢.科普与科技进步关联性研究[J].科研管理,2013,34 (S1):290-295.
[11]杨勇,李素文,包菊芬.科普产业空间集聚度及发展模式识别[J].经济地理,2015,35 (3):127-132.
[12]刘广斌,李建坤.基于三阶段DEA模型的我国科普投入产出效率研究[J].中国软科学,2017 (5):139-148.
[13]马宗文,陈雄,董全超.科普投入对中国科普能力的驱动研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (7):18-25.
[14]刘敢新.基于高校科技资源共享的青少年科技创新能力培养途径研究[J].研究与发展管理,2014,26 (2):133-138.
[15]田松.科学传播:一个新兴的学术领域[J].新闻与传播研究,2007 (2):81-90,97.
[16]劳汉生.我国科普文化产业发展战略框架研究[J].科学学研究,2005 (2):213-219.
[17]张义忠,汤书昆.社会知识化转型中我国国家科普教育基地的可持续发展审视——基于对全国科普教育基地的调查研究[J].中国科技论坛,2008 (11):85-88.
[18]何光喜,赵延东,杨起全.我国科研资源分配不均等程度初探——对科研人员经费集中情况的分析[J].中国软科学,2014 (6):58-66.
[19]江求川.中国福利不平等的演化及分解[J].经济学 (季刊),2015,14 (4):1417-1444.
[20]李永乐,舒帮荣,吴群.中国城市土地利用效率:时空特征、地区差距与影响因素[J].经济地理,2014,34 (1):133-139.
[21]武力超,林子辰,关悦.我国地区公共服务均等化的测度及影响因素研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2014,31 (8):72-86.
[22]默顿R K.科学社会学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2009.
[23]戴平生.基于基尼系数的我国教育经费配置区域与结构公平性分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2014,34 (6):1491-1498.
[24]刘学良,田青.关于基尼系数按群组分解的进一步研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,26 (10):98-111.
[25]科尔J R,科尔S.科学界的社会分层[M].北京:华夏出版社,1989. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 0 
