|
|
|
| Will the Rise of Land Cost Compel Manufacturing Industry Innovation? |
| Gong Guangxiang |
| Institute for the Development of Central China,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The impact of land cost on the firm's innovation behavior with the business environment of Chinese enterprises had been studied in this study,by using the business environment survey data of World Bank.This study employed Heckman two-stage model to correct sample select bias while the problem of endogeneity has been overcome by using instrumental variables technique.Results of the study reveals that rising land cost not only exerts pressure on the firms in terms of their survival but also forces enterprise innovation.Apart from this,the aforesaid cost improves the overall business innovation,and scale of enterprise innovation investments.Analysis of different types of business heterogeneity further indicates that the rising cost of land have increased the scale of innovation investment of non-state-owned,high-efficiency,and export-oriented enterprises in the eastern China,on the other hand,there is no significant impact of aforesaid cost on the state-owned,inefficient,and non-export-oriented enterprises in Central,and Western China.From the above discussion,there is indication that the innovation of enterprises is an endogenous choice of their own development.Though enterprises are facing an increase pressure of external environment and enjoying preferential policies,innovative enterprises with weak foundation will be less innovative,enterprises that are under high pressure and have a certain foundation will highly innovate.
|
|
Received: 21 August 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]钱纳里,鲁宾逊,塞尔奎因.工业化和经济增长的比较研究[M].上海:三联书店,1989.
[2]陈浩,张京祥,陈宏胜.新型城镇化视角下中国 “土地红利”开发模式转型[J].经济地理,2015,35 (4):1-8.
[3]林毅夫,苏剑.论我国经济增长方式的转换[J].管理世界,2007 (11):5-13.
[4]颜燕,贺灿飞,刘涛,等.工业用地价格竞争、集聚经济与企业区位选择——基于中国地级市企业微观数据的经验研究[J].城市发展研究,2014,21 (3):9-13.
[5]藏波,吕萍,赵松.中国园区建设中的工业地价、产业升级及其地区差异:城市层面的产业发展雁行模型[J].中国土地科学,2015,29 (8):24-32.
[6]文雯,车娜,周丁扬,等.工业用地供给与工业转型的互动关系研究——以北京市为例[J].资源科学,2017,39 (9):1702-1711.
[7]黄金升,陈利根,赵爱栋.工业地价上涨、地方政府供地行为与产业转移[J].上海财经大学学报,2017,19 (5):4-14.
[8]周密.研发存量、研发经费来源与知识生产效率[J].经济评论,2012 (5):61-68.
[9]林炜.企业创新激励:来自中国劳动力成本上升的解释[J].管理世界,2013 (10):95-105.
[10]赵西亮,李建强.劳动力成本与企业创新——基于中国工业企业数据的实证分析[J].经济学家,2016 (7):41-49.
[11]诸竹君,黄先海,宋学印,等.劳动力成本上升、倒逼式创新与中国企业加成率动态[J].世界经济,2017,40 (8):53-77.
[12]赵爱栋,蓝菁,马贤磊,等.土地价格市场化对中国工业部门要素投入与技术选择的影响[J].财经研究,2016,42 (8):85-96.
[13]ACEMOGLU D,FINKELSTEIN A.Input and technology choices in regulated industries:Evidence from the health care sector[J].Journal of political economy,2008,116 (5):837-880.
[14]赵文哲,杨继东.地方政府财政缺口与土地出让方式——基于地方政府与国有企业互利行为的解释[J].管理世界,2015 (4):11-24.
[15]干春晖,邹俊,王健.地方官员任期、企业资源获取与产能过剩[J].中国工业经济,2015 (3):44-56.
[16]SEKER M.Importing,exporting and innovation in developing countries[J].Review of international economics,2012,20:299-314.
[17]张杰,芦哲,郑文平,等.融资约束、融资渠道与企业R&D投入[J].世界经济,2012,35 (10):66-90.
[18]吴延兵.中国哪种所有制类型企业最具创新性[J].世界经济,2012,35 (6):3-29.
[19]徐伟,张荣荣,周文梅.国有控股方治理机制、竞争环境与R&D投入[J].中国软科学,2017 (10):184-192.
[20]李力行,黄佩媛,马光荣.土地资源错配与中国工业企业生产率差异[J].管理世界,2016 (8):86-96.
[21]黄玖立,冯志艳.用地成本对企业出口行为的影响及其作用机制[J].中国工业经济,2017 (9):100-118.
[22]HECKMAN J J.Sample selection bias as a specification error[J].Econometrica,1979,47 (1):153-161.
[23]苏莉,冼国明.出口企业工资水平与贸易方式关联之实证[J].世界经济研究,2015 (3):82-129.
[24]张杰,郑文平.全球价值链下中国本土企业的创新效应[J].经济研究,2017,52 (3):151-165.
[25]王展祥,龚广祥,郑婷婷.融资约束及不确定性对非上市制造业R&D投资效率的影响——基于异质性随机前沿函数的实证研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2017 (11):27-37.
[26]FISMAN R,SVENSSON J.Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth？Firm level evidence[J].Journal of development economics,2007,83 (1):63-75.
[27]黄玖立,李坤望.吃喝、腐败与企业订单[J].经济研究,2013,48 (6):71-84.
[28]梁超.垂直专业化、人力资本与我国的技术创新能力——基于工业行业动态面板的实证研究[J].产业经济研究,2013 (2):65-73. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 0 
