企业创新绩效组态路径研究——基于模糊定性分析法

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6776 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract By using the data from the word bank's China-Enterprise Survey and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis,the paper empirically test the causal relationship between innovation factors and innovation performance.The study finds that the combination of innovation input and government subsidy factors could enhance the innovation performance of enterprises;and under the combination of innovation investment,government subsidies and/or external financing and low market competition,SMEs are more likely to achieve high innovation performance;external financing is even more important for big companies to achieve high innovation performance.According to the conclusion,government should constantly improve the mechanism,the financial,property rights and legal systems;formulate innovative market policies for SMEs;increase innovation subsidies and credit support for SMEs;reduce large corporate subsidies;provide lower cost and more convenient external financing for enterprise innovation

Key words： Enterprise innovation Innovation performance Configuration path Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Received: 17 September 2018

PACS:

F061.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Jiang Qibo
	Tan Qingmei

Cite this article:

Jiang Qibo,Tan Qingmei. Configuration Path of Enterprise Innovation Performance ——Based on Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis[J]. , 2019, 0(8): 67-76.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2019/V0/I8/67

[1]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167.
[2]尚洪涛,黄晓硕.政府补贴、研发投入与创新绩效的动态交互效应[J].科学学研究,2018 (3):446-501.
[3]陈岩,湛杨灏,王丽霞,等.研发投入、独立董事结构与创新绩效——基于中国上市家族企业的实证检验[J].科研管理,2018,39 (1):95-107.
[4]胡义东,仲伟俊.高新技术企业技术创新绩效影响因素的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛,2011 (4):80-85.
[5]严焰,池仁勇.R&D投入、技术获取模式与企业创新绩效——基于浙江省高技术企业的实证[J].科研管理,2013,34 (5):48-55.
[6]白俊红.中国的政府R&D资助有效吗?来自大中型工业企业的经验证据[J].经济学 (季刊),2011,10 (4):1375-1400.
[7]PELLEGRINO G,PIVA M,VIVARELLI M.Young firms and innovation:A microeconometric analysis[J].Structural change & economic dynamics,2012,23 (4):329-340.
[8]孙慧,王慧.政府补贴、研发投入与企业创新绩效——基于创业板高新技术企业的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2017,37 (12):111-116.
[9]李培楠,赵兰香,万劲波.创新要素对产业创新绩效的影响——基于中国制造业和高技术产业数据的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2014,32 (4):604-612.
[10]陈子韬,孟凡蓉,王焕.科技人力资源对科技创新绩效的影响:基于企业和高校机构的比较[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38 (9):173-180.
[11]ÁCS Z J.Innovation and small firms[J].David audretsch,1990,1 (1):288-293.
[12]ITENBERG O.Firm size,equity financing and innovation activity[J].Social science electronic publishing,2013:126-138.
[13]WAKASUGI R,KOYATA F.R&D,firm size and innovation outputs:Are Japanese firms efficient in product development[J].Journal of product innovation management,2010,14 (5):383-392.
[14]HONG S,OXLEY L,MCCANN P,et al.Why firm size matters:Investigating the drivers of innovation and economic performance in New Zealand using the business operations survey[J].Applied economics,2017,48 (55):1-17.
[15]JUGEND D,JABBOUR C J C,SCALIZA J A A,et al.Relationships among open innovation,innovative performance,government support and firm size:Comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation[J].Technovation,2018,71 (1):54-65.
[16]GUO D,GUO Y,JIANG K.Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation:Evidence from China[J].Research policy,2016,45 (6):1129-1144.
[17]张帆,孙薇.政府创新补贴效率的微观机理:激励效应和挤出效应的叠加效应——理论解释与检验[J].财政研究,2018 (4):48-60.
[18]JIANG C,ZHANG Y,BU M,et al.The effectiveness of government subsidies on manufacturing innovation:Evidence from the new energy vehicle industry in China[J].Sustainability,2018,10 (6):1692-1708.
[19]王刚刚,谢富纪,贾友.R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视——基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J].中国工业经济,2017 (2):60-78.
[20]BROWN J R,MARTINSSON G,PETERSEN B C.Do financing constraints matter for R&D[J].European economic review,2012,56 (8):1512-1529.
[21]ROBERTS P W.Product innovation,product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S.pharmaceutical industry[J].Strategic management journal,2015,20 (7):655-670.
[22]杨若愚.市场竞争、政府行为与区域创新绩效—基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J].科研管理,2016,37 (12):73-81.
[23]PARK B J,SRIVASTAVA M K,GNYAWALI D R.Walking the tight rope of coopetition:Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance[J].Industrial marketing management,2014,43 (2):210-221.
[24]RAGIN,CHARLESC.Fuzzy-set social science[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2000:291-292.
[25]王凤彬,江鸿,王璁.央企集团管控架构的演进:战略决定、制度引致还是路径依赖?一项定性比较分析 (QCA)尝试[J].管理世界,2014 (12):92-114.
[26]SCHUMPETER J A.A theory of economic development[J].Bloomsbury business library-management library,1934(2008):61-116.
[27]SEHESTED C,SONNENBERG H.Understanding innovation[J].Business horizons,2018(89):36-59.
[28]夏后学,谭清美.简政放权与政府补贴如何影响技术创新[J].财贸经济,2017,38 (5):129-146.
[29]BERG-SCHLOSSER D,MEUR G D.Comparative research design:Case and variable selection[M].Berlin:VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften,2009,19-32.
[30]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal,2011,54 (54):393-420.
[31]RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2010:109-137.
[32]BELL R G,FILATOTCHEV I,AGUILERA R V.Corporate governance and investors′ perceptions of foreign IPO value:An institutional perspective[J].Academy of management journal,2014,57 (1):301-320.
[33]KASK J,LINTON G.Business mating:When start-ups get it right[J].Journal of small business & entrepreneurship,2013,26 (5):511-536.