|
|
|
| Regulatory Relief of Platform Data Monopoly ——Analysis from the Perspective of the Separation of Three Rights |
| Han Shipeng |
| Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a new factor of production,data is non competitive and non expendable,which not only challenges the recognition and circulation of traditional property rights,but also urges the platform to transform its data advantages into market competitive advantages,thereby raising the barriers to market entry and triggering data monopoly,including algorithmic collusion,algorithmic price discrimination,platform stranglehold mergers and acquisitions,and platform bans.In the context of accelerating the construction of a unified national market,in order to promote the circulation of data elements and play a decisive role in the allocation of data resources,it is urgent to clarify the basic connotation and boundaries of data property rights.The positioning of“three rights separation”data property rights can promote the efficient circulation and use of data compliance,clarify data ownership,and maintain the competitive order of the digital market.It is currently an effective approach to crack data monopoly.In terms of specific paths,it is necessary to clarify the rights and connotations of data resource ownership,data processing and usage rights,and data product management rights in the context of antitrust,while refining the boundaries of platform interconnection obligations and improving user privacy protection rules under data monopoly.
|
|
Received: 29 May 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]吴太轩,谭娜娜.算法默示合谋反垄断规制困境及其对策[J].竞争政策研究,2020(6):65.
[2]阿里尔·扎拉奇.人工智能与合谋:当计算机抑制了竞争[M].焦海涛,译,北京:法律出版社,2017:340-364.
[3]韩世鹏.算法价格歧视的规制困境与治理新解:基于算法解释权的视角[J].科技与法律(中英文),2022(6):90-98.
[4]叶明,张洁.反垄断法保护个人信息权益的理据与路径[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023(1):85-96.
[5]唐要家.数据产权的经济分析[J].社会科学辑刊,2021(1):98-106.
[6]李勇坚.数据要素的经济学含义及相关政策建议[J].江西社会科学,2022(3):50-63.
[7]杨东,高清纯.加快建设全国统一大市场背景下数据交易平台规制研究[J/OL].法治研究,[2024-01-04].https://doi.org/10.16224/j.cnki.cn33-1343/d.20230224.002.
[8]周汉华.数据确权的误区[J].法学研究,2023(2):3-20.
[9]杨芳.个人信息保护法保护客体之辨——兼论个人信息保护法和民法适用上之关系[J].比较法研究,2017(5):74-86.
[10]刘辉.个人数据携带权与企业数据获取“三重授权原则”的冲突与调适[J].政治与法律,2022(7):114-131.
[11]王申,许恒.构建数据基础制度进程中的数据确权问题研究[J].理论探索,2023(2):120-128.
[12]周斯佳.个人数据权与个人信息权关系的厘清[J].华东政法大学学报,2020(2):88-97.
[13]蔡立东,姜楠.论土地承包经营权转让中的发包方同意[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2014(4):19-27
[14]蔡立东,姜楠.农地三权分置的法实现[J].中国社会科学,2017(5):102-122.
[15]宋志红.宅基地“三权分置”的法律内涵和制度设计[J].法学评论,2018(4):142-153.
[16]COASE R H.The problem of social cost[J].Journal of law and economics,1960(3):19
[17]KENNETH A.Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention[M].New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1962:615.
[18]刘朝阳.大数据定价问题分析[J].图书情报知识,2016(1):57-64.
[19]鄢浩宇.数据要素市场培育的制度需求与法治保障[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(3):73-90.
[20]周围,黄唯一.反垄断法与隐私保护法的矛盾与纾解[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2023(1):97-107.
[21]高富平.公共机构的数据持有者权——多元数据开放体系的基础制度[J].行政法学研究,2023(4):19-36.
[22]朱战威.反垄断视域下守门人制度的立法表达及其反思[J].地方立法研究,2023(1):51-63.
[23]叶明,李文博.数字经济互联互通的实现方式:问题揭示、欧盟经验及调整方向[J].科技与法律(中英文),2023(2):1-13. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
