基于价值传导视角的科技人才评价改革机制研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2534 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The evaluation of scientific and technological talents has a value-oriented function,which reflects the value cognition of the country.It is found that the value cognition of science and technology innovation in China has changed,with the new value orientation focusing on “Four Focus”.At present,the reform of scientific and technological talent evaluation has achieved some results,but it has not yet made a breakthrough in changing the value orientation.The deep logic of the reform is to establish the evaluation value orientation based on the new cognition of innovation values,which is not only the optimization of the evaluation methods or the adjustment of the evaluation content,but also a systematic transformation.Moreover,two paths are put forward for the value transmission of scientific and technological innovation,the direct path based on policy formulation and implementation and the indirect path based on the allocation of science and technology resources.It also analyzes the value transmission logic and transformation mechanism from the national recognition of the value of scientific and technological innovation to the evaluation of science and technology projects,institutions,talent plans and rewards,base platforms,subject degrees,and then to the micro evaluation of science and technology talents.Finally,from the perspective of constructing an open and diversified evaluation system for scientific and technological talents,it puts forward the suggestions of reform in four aspects,which should be further carried out in the future centering on “reforming the government” “releasing the main body” “strengthening the society”and “establishing the culture”.

Key words： Scientific and technological talents evaluation Value orientation Conduction path Transformation mechanism

Received: 16 January 2023

PACS:

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Hui
	Liang Hongli

Cite this article:

Liu Hui,Liang Hongli. Research on the Reform Mechanism of Scientific and Technological Talents Evaluation from the Perspective of Value Transmission[J]. , 2024, 5(2): 158-167.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I2/158

[1]李红锦,李胜会,许林.科技人才分类评价改革能否促进高校科研水平的高质量发展:基于9所高校改革试点的准自然实验[J].中国科技论坛,2021 (10):114-123,179
[2]刘辉.关于科技人才评价改革若干重点举措的探讨[J].中国科技人才,2021 (1):18-23.
[3]陈光,陈凯华,龚旭,等.优化科学基金同行评议机制的思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36 (12):1427-1433.
[4]徐芳,李晓轩.科技评价改革十年评述[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37 (5):603-612.
[5]孟溦,张群.科研评价 “五唯”何以难破——制度分析的视角[J].中国高教研究,2021 (9):51-58.
[6]徐芳,李晓轩,李超平,等.关于 “三评”改革效果的调查分析[J].科学与社会,2019,9 (3):22-33.
[7]范军.比 “四唯”危害更大的是 “唯项目”[J].社会科学动态,2018 (12):15-17.
[8]陈云伟,张志强.科技评价走出 “破”与 “立”困局的思考与建议[J].情报学报,2020,39 (8):796-805.
[9]章熙春.我国科技评价体系的困境与优化[J].学术研究,2020 (10):38-46,177.
[10]公丕明.新时代深化科技人才评价改革:现实基础、主要问题与实现路径[J].特区经济,2022 (9):7-11.
[11]王海燕,张昕妍.我国科技评价体系改革的困境与对策[J].中国软科学,2018 (4):10-17.
[12]刘飒,吴康敏,张虹鸥.中国科技人才评价转向:基于国家创新系统理论视角[J].科技管理研究,2021 (16):55-62.
[13]龚放,曲铭峰.南京大学个案:SCI引入评价体系对中国大陆大学基础研究的影响[J].高等理科教育,2010,1 (3):4-17.
[14]曾建勋. “以刊评文”的危害与应对策略研究[J].编辑学报,2020,32 (4):355-360.
[15]潘教峰,王光辉,鲁晓.基于五大价值导向的 “破四唯”和 “立新标”[J].科学通报,2022,67 (3):236-241.
[16]袁景蒂.高校科研人才评价理论·反思·重构:基于工具理性与对话理性的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2022 (3):25-32.
[17]张应强,周钦.从学术单位体治理走向学术共同体治理:我国大学学术治理改革的基本方向[J].高等教育研究,2022,43 (2):31-41.
[18]陈敏,刘佐菁,苏帆. “三评”改革两周年回顾:取得成效、存在问题与对策建议[J].科技管理研究,2021,41 (8):43-49.
[19]周华强,周颖,冯文帅,等.论文人才评价作用的反思:回归、认可、补充与反对[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (1):143-155.
[20]潘教峰. “破四唯”和 “立新标”并举完善科技人才评价体系[J].中国科技人才,2021 (5):2-3.
[21]甘宇慧,侯胜超,邹立君.政策工具视角下我国科技人才评价政策文本分析[J].科研管理,2022,43 (3):55-62.