|
|
|
| Research on Construction of Security Risk Indicator System in Key Science and Technology Area |
| Cai Jinsong1, Tan Shuang2, Wu Jiaqi1 |
1. School of Public Administration,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China;
2. School of Law and Humanities,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing,Beijing 100083,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The new round of Scientific and Technological (S&T)revolution and industrial change and China's accelerated transformation of economic development form a historic intersection.It has profound implications for the challenges the country faces and the way it maintains security. Maintaining security in Science and Technology area,especially in Key S&T area,has become a top priority in the implementation of the holistic view of national security.It is therefore of great importance to explore the construction of a system of indicators for evaluating security risks in Key S&T area.On the basis of exploring the connotation of security risks in Key S&T area,this study built a “Double-edged & Multi-center”Risk Assessment Framework according to the principle of “C-S-F-C-W-D”in the construction of the index system.Based on the framework,4 primary indicators,13 secondary indicators,and 35 tertiary indicators were designed according to the logic from overall to general,from phenomenon to essence,and the indicator weights were calculated based on the scoring results of the consulting experts.This paper initially constructs an index system for security risk assessment in China's Key S&T area,which will help to grasp the development trends in this field in a refined manner and provides governance tools for building New National System for S&T innovation.
|
|
Received: 22 April 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]LIN C,LI Z.Theoretical study of strategic management of science and technology security[J].Science of science & management of S&T,2007,29 (12):102-106.
[2]FROLOV A.Problems of coordination of science and technology,innovation and industrial policy in Russia[J].Journal of the new economic association,2013,20:133-147.
[3]杜人淮,马宇飞.国防工业军民融合水平测度与对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33 (9):108-116.
[4]YU J.In-depth military and civilian integration in the new era from institutional perspective[J].National defense science & technology,2016,37 (6):12-19.
[5]XI X,WU H,YAN T.Research on improving management of marine national defense science and technology reports[J].Ship standardization engineer,2015,48 (1):69-77.
[6]RONFELDT D.Tribes,institutions,markets,networks:a framework about societal evolution[R].CA:Rand corporation,1996.
[7]刁联旺,王珩.国家科技安全评价及其统计分析[C].第四届中国指挥控制大会论文集.北京:电子工业出版社,2016:553-557.
[8]胡雅萍,刘千里,潘彬彬.维护科技安全的情报预测研究[J].情报杂志,2014,33 (9):8-12,7.
[9]游光荣,张斌,张守明,等.国家科技安全:概念、特征、形成机理与评估框架初探[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2019,33 (2):5-10.
[10]孙德梅,吴丰,陈伟.中国科技安全影响因素实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34 (22):107-114.
[11]潘正祥,杨迎会.全球化与国家科技安全[J].中国科技论坛,2007 (5):19-23.
[12]张利英,郭建平.21世纪初世界科技走向及中国科技安全环境研究[J].科技进步与对策,2004 (2):14-16.
[13]张振伟,黄露.科技安全监测指标体系构建研究[J].科技智囊,2020 (4):27-31.
[14]曾琼,玄兆辉.从主要科技指标看中国地区科技发展特征[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29 (6):26-30.
[15]孙德梅,吴丰,唐月,等.军民融合背景下国防科技工业科技安全评价研究——以电子工业为例[J].情报杂志,2017,36 (11):28-33.
[16]王刚,陈伟,曹秋红.国防科技工业科技安全能力评价[J].北京理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2020,22 (5):107-112.
[17]科学技术部.中国科学技术指标2016年[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2011.
[18]中国科协创新战略研究院.中国科学技术与工程指标 (2020)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2020.
[19]金高峰.从中国科技指标体系的变迁看科技体制改革[J].科技进步与对策,2008 (1):7-10.
[20]邹纲明,汤亚非.基于科技指标分析的广东科技竞争力研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27 (2):37-40.
[21]王俊.清华教授:中国科技创新改革很成功但自主创新能力不足[EB/OL]. (2018-12-19)[2020-12-10].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1620279801023337697&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[22]郭铁成,张赤东.中国对外技术依存度究竟是多少:基于全球化视角的测算[J].中国软科学,2012 (2):35-41.
[23]梁梦凡.科技领军人才健康状况及影响因素研究[D].西安:西安工程大学,2016.
[24]马有才,赵友宝.基于高新技术产业安全的民营科技企业自主创新能力培育研究[J].生产力研究,2007 (12):124-126.
[24]苏玉娟.公共安全科技的风险分析及其解决路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27 (4):27-29.
[25]张冰.新时期科技管理体制存在的具体问题及应对方法分析[J].黑龙江科技信息,2016 (14):14.
[26]徐文超,艾轶博.重大科技基础设施建设的战略意义[J].中国高校科技与产业化,2011 (S1):37-38.
[27]莫少群.风险社会环境下科学的社会责任问题研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008,25 (12):197-200.
[28]巩红新.现代技术风险冲突及其综合治理研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2015.
[29]董丽娅.中国科技指标发展现状及关注的问题[J].科技管理研究,2001 (1):3-5. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
