|
|
|
| Research on the Long-Term Impact of Science Foundation on Academic Output |
| Qiao Jinzhong1, Sun Na2, Shen Jingxuan3, Wang Kun4 |
1. Institute of Higher Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;
2. Institute of Higher Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;
3. Graduate School of Education,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;
4. Alumni and Foundation Work Office of Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the stage of high-quality development, “innovation driven”is a national strategy.Government financial support plays an important role in R&D in key technology fields and the construction of scientific and technological innovation centers.The allocation of financial funds is competitive,and the investment in science and technology also needs to be evaluated.To reasonably evaluate the impact of science funds on academic output,we should not only look at the role of the project during the funding period,but also consider the incentive effect before the application and the continuous effect after the completion of the project.The research uses the multi period DID isochronous double difference method to explore the role of NSFC projects in the quantity,quality and academic influence of academic output.It is found that the project funding effect is more obvious in 1～10 years after funding.The improvement of quality is more significant in 6～10 years after the grant,and the improvement of academic influence is more obvious in the grant period (1～5 years).Outstanding young scholars have significant application effect and assessment effect in the process of applying for projects.There are obvious disciplinary differences in the impact of NSFC projects on academic output.Therefore,some suggestions are put forward,such as reasonably lengthening the scientific research evaluation cycle,changing the funding mode of basic research,and encouraging enterprises and public welfare funds to invest in basic research.
|
|
Received: 22 December 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]范内瓦·布什,拉什·D·霍尔特.科学无尽前沿[M].崔传刚,译.北京:中信出版社,2021.
[2]MAISANO D A,MASTROGIACOMO L,FRANCESCHINI F.Short-term effects of non-competitive funding to single academic researchers[J].Scientometrics,2020,123 (3):1261-1280.
[3]AURANEN O,NIEMINEN M.University research funding and publication performance—an international comparison[J].Research policy,2010,39 (6):822-834.
[4]贝尔纳.科学的社会功能[M].陈体芳,译.广西:广西师范大学出版社,2003.
[5]普赖斯.小科学·大科学[M].宋剑耕,戴振飞,译.上海:世界科学杂志社,1982.
[6]龚旭,夏文莉.美国联邦政府开展的基础研究绩效评估及其启示[J].科研管理,2003 (2):1-8.
[7]DEFAZIO D,LOCKETT A,WRIGHT M.Funding incentives,collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity:evidence from the EU framework program[J].Research policy,2009,38 (2):293-305.
[8]FENG G C.Research performance evaluation in China:a big data analysis[J].Sage open,2020,10 (1):1-11.
[9]GREGORUTTI G.A mixed-method study of the environmental and personal factors that influence faculty research productivity at small-medium,private,doctorate-granting universities[M].St Andrews:Andrews University,2008.
[10]JACOB B A,LEFGREN L.The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity[J].Journal of public economics,2011,95 (9/10):1168-1177.
[11]ANDERSON B R,FEIST G J.Transformative science:a new index and the impact of non-funding,private funding,and public funding[J].Social epistemology,2017,31 (2):130-151.
[12]BOZEMAN B,CORLEY E.Scientists' collaboration strategies:implications for scientific and technical human capital[J].Research policy,2004,33 (4):599-616.
[13]HUSSINGER K,CARVALHO J N.The long-term effect of research grants on the scientific output of university professors[J].Industry and innovation,2021 (11):1-23.
[14]CREAMER E G.Assessing faculty publication productivity:issues for equity[M].Washington,D.C.:ERIC Publications,1998.
[15]FEDDERKE J W,GOLDSCHMIDT M.Does massive funding support of researchers work？Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative[J].Research policy,2015,44 (2):467-482.
[16]TONTA Y.Does monetary support increase the number of scientific papers? An interrupted time series analysis[C].16th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference,2017.
[17]BENAVENTE J M,CRESPI G,GARONE L F,et al.The impact of national research funds:a regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean fondecyt[J].Research policy,2012,41 (8):1461-1475.
[18]田人合,郑军卫,张志强,等.科技人力资本视角下杰青科学家资助年龄对资助效果的影响——以杰青基金地球科学项目为例[J].图书情报工作,2019,63 (22):91-105.
[19]傅衍.基于政策目标达成与政策体验的海外高层次人才政策绩效评估研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2020.
[20]谷志远.高校青年教师学术产出绩效影响因素的实证研究——基于个性特征和机构因素的差异分析[J].高教探索,2011 (1):129-136.
[21]阎光才.学术系统的分化结构与学术精英的生成机制[J].高等教育研究,2010,31 (3):1-11.
[22]MERTON R K.The Matthew effect in science,II:cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property[J].ISIS,1988,79 (4):606-623.
[23]赵鼎新.社会科学研究的困境:从与自然科学的区别谈起[J].社会学评论,2015,3 (4):3-18.
[24]阿达·约纳特,秦燕,张文.学科融合:由X射线晶体学揭示的生命进程中的化学基础[J].中国科学:化学,2012,42 (1):87-89.
[25]尹木子. “预聘-长聘”制度会提升中国大学科研生产力吗——基于多期双重差分法的政策评估[J].高教探索,2020 (6):18-27.
[26]任羽中,俞蕖,赵颖. “预聘-长聘制”对高校科研产出的影响机制与成效分析[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2020 (4):41-52.
[27]PAK C M,YU G,WANG W.A study on the citation situation within the citing paper:citation distribution of references according to mention frequency[J].Scientometrics,2018,114 (3):905-918.
[28]LANDRY R,AMARA N.The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research[J].Research policy,1998,27 (9):901-913.
[29]KIM M J.Korean science and international collaboration,1995—2000[J].Scientometrics,2005,63 (2):321-339.
[30]SKOIE H.Basic research-a new funding climate[J].Science and public policy,1996,23 (2):66-75.
[31]国家自然科学基金委员会政策局.筑科技强国之基,国家自然科学基金 “十三五”发展战略研究报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2017.
[32]ABBOTT A.European researchers chase billion-euro technology prize[EB/OL]. (2011-03-08)[2022-03-25].https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2011.143. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
