基金资助对科研产出的影响——基于合成生物学领域的分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1267 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the impact of scientific research funding in the field of synthetic biology on scientific research output,this paper selects the funded papers included in the Web of Science database as the research objects,and collects the top five countries with the largest number of papers published from 2010 to 2020.The research shows the followings.①Funding has effectively increased the amount of scientific research output.China's scientific research output has grown rapidly and surpassed the United States for the first time in 2019 and ranked first in the world.②Funding can promote the quality of scientific research output,but the degree of significance varies across countries.China's output quality still lags behind the United States,the United Kingdom,Germany,and Japan.③Compared with the United States,the United Kingdom,and Germany,the effect of funded funding on the relative influence of scientific research in China and Japan is not significant.Compared with non-funded papers,funded funding has effectively improved the relative influence of scientific research output.The relative impact of non-funded papers in UK is higher than that of funded papers,which is further explained in this paper.

Key words： Scientific research funding Scientific research output evaluation Synthetic biology Funding effect

Received: 08 December 2021

PACS:	G321
	C935

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Guan Jiao
	Hu Guangyuan

Cite this article:

Guan Jiao,Hu Guangyuan. Research on the Impact of Fund Support on Scientific Research Output——Empirical Analysis Based on Synthetic Biology[J]. , 2022, 3(10): 1-13.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I10/1

[1]WANG L,WANG X,PIRO F N,et al.The effect of competitive public funding on scientific output:a comparison between China and the EU[J].Research evaluation,2020,29(4):418-429.
[2]BRAUN D.Lasting tensions in research policy-making:a delegation problem[J].Science and public policy,2003,30(5):309-321.
[3]LEPORI B.Public research funding and research policy:a long-term analysis for the Swiss case[J].Science and public policy,2006,33(3):205-216.
[4]DIXON T.Mapping the potential impact of synthetic biology on Australian foreign policy[J].Australian journal of international affairs,2019,73(3):270-288.
[5]ZHANG L,CHANG S,WANG J.Synthetic biology:from the first synthetic cell to see its current situation and future development[J].Chinese science bulletin,2011,56(3):229-237.
[6]宋志红,郭艳新,李冬梅.科学基金资助提高科研产出了吗?——基于倾向得分分层法的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(1):116-121,160.
[7]GAO J P,SU C,WANG H Y,et al.Research fund evaluation based on academic publication output analysis:the case of Chinese research fund evaluation[J].Scientometrics,2019,119(2):959-972.
[8]FEDDERKE J W,GOLDSCHMIDT M.Does massive funding support of researchers work? Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative[J].Research policy,2015,44(2):467-482.
[9]SAQIB M A N,RAFIQUE I.Health research funding and its output in Pakistan[J].Eastern mediterranean health journal,2021,27(9):906-910.
[10]李文平,刘莹.项目申请者“头衔”更有利于科研绩效提升吗:一个面向国家社科基金教育学项目产出的倒序评估[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(21):18-26.
[11]尚虎平,赵盼盼.项目申请者的哪些特征影响科研绩效提升:一个面向国家自然科学基金产出的倒序评估[J].科学学研究,2014,32(9):1378-1389.
[12]田人合,郑军卫,张志强,等.科技人力资本视角下杰青科学家资助年龄对资助效果的影响——以杰青基金地球科学项目为例[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(22):91-105.
[13]田人合,张志强,王非,等.基于DID模型的科技政策创新能力资助效应实证研究——以杰青基金地球科学项目为例[J].情报学报,2018,37(8):782-795.
[14]YIN Z,LIANG Z,ZHI Q.Does the concentration of scientific research funding in institutions promote knowledge output[J].Journal of informetrics,2018,12(4):1146-1159.
[15]MONGEON P,BRODEUR C,BEAUDRY C,et al.Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns[J].Research evaluation,2016,25(4):396-404.
[16]GOEK A,RIGBY J,SHAPIRA P.The impact of research funding on scientific outputs:evidence from six smaller European countries[J].Journal of the association for information science and technology,2016,67(3):715-730.
[17]COSTAS R,VAN LEEUWEN T N.Approaching the“reward triangle”:general analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and“peer interactive communication”in scientific publications[J].Journal of the American society for information science and technology,2012,63(8):1647-1661.
[18]SANDSTROM U,VAN DEN BESSELAAR P.Funding,evaluation,and the performance of national research systems[J].Journal of informetrics,2018,12(1):365-384.
[19]DEFAZIO D,LOCKETT A,WRIGHT M.Funding incentives,collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity:Evidence from the EU framework program[J].Research policy,2009,38(2):293-305.
[20]JACOB B A,LEFGREN L.The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity[J].Journal of public economics,2011,95(9-10):1168-1177.
[21]FONSECA B D P,ALBUQUERQUE P C,ZICKER F.Neglected tropical diseases in Brazil:lack of correlation between disease burden,research funding and output[J].Tropical medicine & international health,2020,25(11):1373-1384.
[22]ZHI Q,MENG T.Funding allocation,inequality,and scientific research output:an empirical study based on the life science sector of natural science foundation of China[J].Scientometrics,2016,106(2):603-628.
[23]杜宝贵,董宸萌.中国科技政策学术研究成果量化评析——基于1949—2018年科技政策论文类成果[J].科学与管理,2019,39(5):1-12.
[24]MENG F,ELLIS T.The second decade of synthetic biology:2010—2020[J].Nature communications,2020,11(1):1-4.
[25]张诗乐,盖双双,刘雪立.国家自然科学基金资助的效果——基于论文产出的文献计量学评价[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):507-515.
[26]董琳,刘清.国外学科评价及其文献计量评价指标研究[J].情报理论与实践,2008(1):37-40.
[27]徐芳,龚旭,李晓轩.科研评价改革与发展40年——以基金委同行评议和中科院研究所综合评价为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(12):17-27.
[28]王莉华.同行评议科研评价的运行管理:英国RAE案例的启示[J].中国高教研究,2012(5):53-57.
[29]MOLOKHIA M,DE PONTI F,BEHR E R,et al.Academic output from EU-funded health research projects[J].The lancet,2012,380(9857):1903-1904.
[30]张恩瑜,王珏,张奇,等.国家自然科学基金资助项目综合评价——基于Vague集多准则决策[J].管理科学学报,2015,18(2):76-84.
[31]郭嘉,罗玲玲,邢怀滨.自然科学基金促进人才成长的对策与绩效研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(6):92-101.
[32]陈秋怡,刘海波.科研基金资助投入与高水平国际论文产出研究——基于六国SCI论文的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛,2018(1):158-163.
[33]WANG X,LIU D,DING K,et al.Science funding and research output:a study on 10 countries[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(2):591-599.
[34]CHEN H,ROCO M C,SON J,et al.Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012:patents,scientific publications,and effect of NSF funding[J].Journal of nanoparticle research,2013,15(9):1-21.
[35]杨芳娟,刘云,宋赛赛.基于循证设计的中国博士后科学基金整体资助绩效评估[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(8):152-161.
[36]TANG L,HU G,LIU W.Funding acknowledgment analysis:queries and caveats[J].Journal of the association for information science and technology,2017,68(3):790-794.
[37]SHAPIRA P,KWON S,YOUTIE J.Tracking the emergence of synthetic biology[J].Scientometrics,2017,112(3):1439-1469.
[38]HAO J,WELCH A.A tale of sea turtles:job-seeking experiences of hai gui(high-skilled returnees)in China[J].Higher education policy,2012,25(2):243-260.
[39]武学超.英国学术研究卓越的生成逻辑与启示[J].中国高教研究,2012(6):22-26.
[40]索传军,盖双双.基于引文的论文质量与影响力探析[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(5):11-15.
[41]李一杉,刘金松.教育实证研究改善了学术论文的质量和影响力吗——以中国大陆教育学术研究领域为例[J].教育发展研究,2021,41(9):63-77.
[42]薛欣欣.我国高校教育学院学术竞争力比较研究——基于2018年16家高等教育研究最具影响力期刊的载文统计[J].中国高教研究,2019(9):94-108.
[43]SONG Y,GAN Y.International mobility activities predict research output:a longitudinal study[J].Psych journal,2022,11(2):235-46.
[44]魏立才,黄祎.学术流动对回国青年理工科人才科研生产力的影响研究——基于Web of Science论文分析[J].高等工程教育研究,2020(1):67-73.
[45]哈巍,于佳鑫.辅助人员对科研生产力的影响——以中国科学院为例[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2019,37(1):83-94,168.
[46]赵丽梅,马海群.Q～2SRC-指数:基于情境的科学家科研生产力评价指标研究[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(24):110-123.
[47]RAJAN K S,SWAMINATHAN S,VAIDHYASUBRAMANIAM S.Research output of Indian institutions during 2011—2016:Quality and quantity perspective[J].Current science,2018,114(4):740-746.
[48]HATEMI J A,AJMI A N,EL MONTASSER G,et al.Research output and economic growth in G7 countries:new evidence from asymmetric panel causality testing[J].Applied economics,2016,48(24):2301-2308.
[49]郭丛斌.中国高水平大学学科发展现状与建设路径分析——从ESI、QS和US News排名的视角[J].教育研究,2016,37(12):62-73.
[50]林涛.国内农业高校科研产出比较研究——基于CNKI、SCI、Incites和CSCD[J].图书情报研究,2016,9(4):89-95.
[51]PANAT R.On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China:India has significantly fallen behind China[J].Scientometrics,2014,100(2):471-481.
[52]叶勤,谢群,熊婵.我国农业高校SSCI论文计量分析——以部分农业高校为例[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012(2):136-140.
[53]GUPTA B M,KSHITIJ A,VERMA C.Mapping of Indian computer science research output,1999—2008[J].Scientometrics,2011,86(2):261-283.
[54]HE Y,GUAN J.Contribution of Chinese publications in computer science:a case study on LNCS[J].Scientometrics,2008,75(3):519-534.
[55]唐莉,SHAPIRA P,YOUTIE J.中国科研成果的引用增长是否存在“俱乐部效应”[J].财经研究,2016,42(10):94-107.
[56]AGARWAL R,TU W.NIH funding,research productivity,and scientific impact:a 20-year study[J].Journal of general internal medicine,2022,37(1):104-109.
[57]张爽,夏琬钧,何雪梅.高校ESI学科排名影响因素解析及提升路径研究[J].情报杂志,2020,39(1):162-166.
[58]GALSWORTHY M J,HRISTOVSKI D,LUSA L,et al.Academic output of 9 years of EU investment into health research[J].The lancet,2012,380(9846):971-972.
[59]顾欢.“影响因子百分位”与SNIP的跨学科评价效力实证分析[J].情报杂志,2017,36(7):134-137.
[60]PAVITT K.Why European Union funding of academic research should be increased:a radical proposal[J].Science and public policy,2000,27(6):455-460.
[61]LIU W,TANG L,HU G.Funding information in web of science:an updated overview[J].Scientometrics,2020,122(3):1509-1524.