|
|
Ecosystem Construction and Development Assessment of the Industrial Application of Emerging Technologies:A Case Study of Big Data |
Zhou Zhong, Xiong Yan, Zhang Lingang |
School of Economic and Management,Shanghai Institute of Technology,Shanghai 201418,China |
|
|
Abstract Taking the case of high-sensitive Big Data,an ecosystem framework for the application of emerging technology industries is constructed based on the viewpoint of resource supply matching and industry-university-research integration.According to the ecosystem framework,the industrial application of emerging technologies is promoted by the cooperation of government,enterprises and scientific research institutions.It is necessary to pool important resources such as technology,talents and funds at the same time,and form a mutually supportive and influential relationship between subjects and resources.The government plays the role of guiding the coordinated development of various subjects and resources by industrial planning,implementation plans and corresponding supporting policies.Through index structure decomposition and score design,the analysis of ecosystem-oriented data shows that the characteristics of the industrial application of eight national “Big Data”comprehensive pilot zones are different among regions.Relying on the circulation and transaction of big data resources,Guizhou and Shanghai are all in the lead.However,the establishment and operation of industrial funds are generally lagging behind.We suggest that it's needed to guide the selective construction of ecosystem elements,combining with the differential function positioning.
|
Received: 12 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]KUHLMANN S,STEGMAIER P,KONRAD K.The tentative governance of emerging science and technology—a conceptual introduction[J].Research policy,2019,48(5):1091-1097. [2]李昌浩,徐琪,罗鄂湘,等.上海市战略性新兴产业领域企业创新成果产业化能力研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(6):39-44. [3]张保建.“双创”背景下企业孵化生态体系构建[J].中国科技论坛,2019(3):7-9. [4]李晓锋.“四链”融合提升创新生态系统能级的理论研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(9):113-120. [5]孙玉涛,刘凤朝.中国企业技术创新主体地位确立——情境、内涵和政策[J].科学学研究,2016,34(11):1716-1724. [6]LIN C,WU Y,CHANG C,et al.The alliance innovation performance of R&D alliances—the absorptive capacity perspective[J].Technovation,2012,32(5):282-292. [7]GIANNOPOULOU E,BARLATIER P,PENIN J.Same but different? Research and technology organizations,universities and the innovation activities of firms[J].Research policy,2019,48(1):223-233. [8]欧光军,杨青,雷霖.国家高新区产业集群创新生态能力评价研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(8):63-71. [9]NESTLE V,TAUBE F,HEIDENREICH S,et al.Establishing open innovation culture in cluster initiatives:the role of trust and information asymmetry[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2018,146(6):563-572. [10]高月姣,吴和成.创新主体及其交互作用对区域创新能力的影响研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(10):51-57. [11]LIU F,SIMON D,SUN Y,et al.China's innovation policies:evolution,institutional structure,and trajectory[J].Research policy,2011,40(7):917-931. [12]MAGRO E,WILSON J.Policy-mix evaluation:governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies[J].Research policy,2019,48(10):103612. [13]蔡翔,赵娟.大学—企业—政府协同创新效率及其影响因素研究[J].软科学,2019,33(2):56-60. [14]LI X,WANG J,LIU X.Can locally-recruited R&D personnel significantly contribute to multinational subsidiary innovation in an emerging economy[J].International business review,2013,22(4):639-651. [15]李永周,高楠鑫,易倩,等.创新网络嵌入与高技术企业研发人员创新绩效关系研究[J].管理科学,2018,31(2):3-19. [16]肖文,林高榜.政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2014(4):71-80. [17]王玉冬,武川,王琳璐.高新技术企业创新资金运营生态化及其水平测度[J].中国软科学,2017(7):101-115. [18]孙晓华,郭旭,王昀.政府补贴、所有权性质与企业研发决策[J].管理科学学报,2017,20(6):18-31. [19]上海市经济与信息化委员会.2018开放数据创新应用大赛颁奖仪式暨长三角大数据高峰论坛报名[EB/OL].(2018-12-7)[2019-3-6].http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2315/nw31406/u21aw1353666.html. [20]贵阳大数据交易所.交易平台综合介绍[EB/OL].[2019-3-6].http://www.gbdex.com/website/view/dealPlat-index.jsp. |
|
|
|