Abstract：The difficulty in converting scientific and technological achievements into practical applications constitutes a critical bottleneck constraining the overall effectiveness of China's innovation system.As a significant innovative policy within the national technology transfer framework,the establishment of regional technology transfer centers plays a vital role in stimulating innovation and entrepreneurial dynamism.This article employs a multi-period difference-in-differences model to systematically analyse the impact of the pilot policy on urban entrepreneurial activity,based on panel data of 286 cities from 2003 to 2023.Findings reveal that the pilot policy significantly enhances urban entrepreneurial activity,with its effects being more pronounced in regions with lower administrative levels.By sector,the policy's entrepreneurial impact is particularly evident in manufacturing,technology-intensive industries,and capital-intensive industries.Mechanism analysis indicates that the pilot policy advances urban entrepreneurial development through venture capital clustering effects,talent aggregation effects,technology diffusion effects,and intellectual property protection effects.This article supplements empirical evidence on the economic effects of technology transfer at the urban entrepreneurial level,offering policy insights for enhancing technology transfer to bolster urban entrepreneurial vitality.
王福涛, 谢健, 王芷昀. 国家技术转移区域中心的创业驱动效应研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(2): 112-120.
Wang Futao, Xie Jian, Wang Zhiyun. Research on the Entrepreneurship-Driven Effects of Regional Technology Transfer Centers in China. , 2026(2): 112-120.
[1]HOMBERT J,SCHOAR A,SRAER D,et al.Can unemployment insurance spur entrepreneurial activity?Evidence from France[J].Journal of Finance,2020,75(3):1247-1285. [2]刘刚.发展新质生产力的基本路径[J].中国科技论坛,2025(8):3. [3]MINNITI M.The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity:Productive,unproductive,or destructive[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2008,32(5):779-790. [4]陈刚.管制与创业:来自中国的微观证据[J].管理世界,2015(5):89-99,187-188. [5]KAPLAN D S,PIEDRA E,SEIRA E.Entry regulation and business start-ups:Evidence from Mexico[J].Journal of Public Economics,2011,95(11/12):1501-1515. [6]白俊红,张艺璇,卞元超.创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度:来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2022(6):61-78. [7]周文义,陶一桃.智慧城市建设能提升创业水平吗:基于双重差分模型的检验[J].统计研究,2023,40(8):122-134. [8]LI Z,PANG S,ZHU Z.The impact of pilot free trade zones on entrepreneurship:Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China[J].Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2024,92:101801. [9]梁季,吕慧,郭宝棋.减税降费促进创业了吗:基于营商环境的有调节中介模型[J].财政研究,2022(12):57-74. [10]杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度:基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155. [11]赵富森,李璐.知识产权制度的创业效应研究:基于中国知识产权示范城市建设的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2021(6):44-57. [12]韩先锋,郑酌基,李勃昕,等.行政体制改革、营商环境优化与数字创新驱动:来自“放管服”的新证据[J].公共管理学报,2024,21(4):1-15,166. [13]ACS Z J,BRAUNERHJELM P,AUDRETSCH D B,et al.The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship[J].Small Business Economics,2009,32(1):15-30. [14]肖小虹,彭金霞,贺小刚.技术市场赋能地方创业活力:来自中国省级地区的经验证据[J].经济问题探索,2022(10):53-76. [15]MOWERY D C,NELSON R R,SAMPAT B N,et al.The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S.universities:An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980[J].Research Policy,2001,30(1):99-119. [16]杨壮,吴福象.科技中介如何影响城市创新:基于NTTRC设立的准自然实验[J].科学学研究,2024,42(10):2206-2215,2227. [17]郑曼妮,黎文靖,谭有超.技术转移与企业高质量创新[J].世界经济,2024,47(3):66-93. [18]余泳泽,唐孝妍.高校基础研究与创新知识溢出:来自高校设立技术转移机构的证据[J].中国软科学,2024(3):162-173. [19]曾婧婧,温永林,毕超.高校技术转移与企业技术转移对区域创新能力的差异性贡献:技术转移中心的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(6):84-91. [20]NORTH D C.Institutions,institutional change and economic performance[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990. [21]HEGDE D,TUMLINSON J.Information frictions and entrepreneurship[J].Strategic Management Journal,2021,42(3):491-528. [22]CLAYTON P,FELDMAN M,LOWE N.Behind the scenes:Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship[J].Academy of Management Perspectives,2018,32(1):104-124. [23]BRAUNERHJELM P,DING D,THULIN P.Labour as a knowledge carrier:How increased mobility influences entrepreneurship[J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2016,41:1308-1326. [24]王福涛,谢健,熊培志.知识产权保护如何影响城市创新集聚:兼论有为政府和有效市场[J].经济与管理研究,2024,45(12):68-87. [25]BECK T,LEVINE R,LEVKOV A.Big bad banks?The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J].Journal of Finance,2010,65(5):1637-1667. [26]KLAPPER L F,LOVE I.The impact of the financial crisis on new firm registration[J].Economics Letters,2010,113(1):1-4. [27]王智毓,吕华侨,西桂权,等.数字技术创新如何促进城市服务业发展[J].中国科技论坛,2025(7):67-76. [28]ROSENBAUM P R,RUBIN D B.The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J].Biometrika,1983,70(1):41-55. [29]曹希广,邓敏.电子商务政策与企业家创业精神[J].世界经济,2024,47(4):31-64. [30]鲁桐,党印.公司治理与技术创新:分行业比较[J].经济研究,2014,49(6):115-128. [31]CAPELLO R,LENZI C.The knowledge-innovation nexus.Its spatially differentiated returns to innovation[J].Growth and Change,2015:46(3),379-399. [32]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120. [33]冯兴华,高紫媛,徐美海,等.基于专利技术转移的城市群创新网络结构及其组织模式[J].经济地理,2024,44(10):66-75. [34]沈国兵,黄铄珺.城市层面知识产权保护对中国企业引进外资的影响[J].财贸经济,2019,40(12):143-157.
2026, 
