Strategic Technological Innovationand Commercial Technological Innovation: The Analysis of the Collaborative Evolution in Industrial Technological Breakthroughs
Wang Weiguang, Wu Boya, Feng Rongkai
Division of Economics,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,China
Abstract：Industrial technological breakthroughs are the result of the interaction between government-supported corporate R&D activities and enterprises'spontaneous R&D activities.The former refers to organized technological innovation activities serving national strategic needs,namely strategic technological innovation;the latter is the technological innovation process where enterprises focus on their own development goals,namely commercial technological innovation.This paper deconstructs the connotation of industrial technology from the dimensions of technological importance,core status and urgency.Combined with practical industrial cases,it uses basic economic theories to analyze the collaborative evolution of strategic technological innovation and commercial technological innovation,as well as the laws of industrial technological breakthroughs driven by this interaction.The study finds that with the guidance of appropriate innovation policies,during the three stages of“induction-growth-diffusion”in industrial technological innovation breakthroughs,the collaborative evolution of strategic technological innovation and commercial technological innovation can promote industrial technological breakthroughs and accelerate the in-depth integration of innovation chains and industrial chains through the driving forces of“positive traction”and“reverse promotion”.This paper explores the driving forces and processes behind the collaborative evolution between enterprises'strategic R&D activities supported by the government and their independent commercial R&D activities.Accurately identifying strategic technologies,optimizing the direction of policy support,and strengthening industrial collaborative innovation will help enhance the industrial capability of technological breakthroughs.
[1]王伟光,韩旭.企业战略性技术创新与产业自主可控水平[J].中国工业经济,2024(8):43-60. [2]王伟光,王洋洋,孙福全.政府支持企业技术创新与企业经济价值[J].中国软科学,2025(6):132-142. [3]杨洋,魏江,罗来军.谁在利用政府补贴进行创新:所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J].管理世界,2015(1):75-86,98,188. [4]陆国庆,王舟,张春宇.中国战略性新兴产业政府创新补贴的绩效研究[J].经济研究,2014,49(7):44-55. [5]TAKALO T,TANAYAMA T.Adverse selection and financing of innovation:Is there a need for R&D subsidies[J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2010,35(1):16-41. [6]崔兆财,张志新,李成.政府资助与企业创新:缓解匮缺还是滋长惰性[J].科研管理,2023,44(5):140-148. [7]武咸云,陈艳,李秀兰,等.战略性新兴产业研发投入、政府补助与企业价值[J].科研管理,2017,38(9):30-34. [8]阳镇,王文娜.产业链链主视角下的关键核心技术突破:角色适配性、模式选择与推进体系[J].改革,2024(9):100-114. [9]郑江淮,钱贵明.“两个世界悖论”破解与关键核心技术创新:理论与实践[J].经济学家,2023(5):15-23. [10]王伟光,宋洪玲.战略性技术创新何以提升企业新质生产力[J].河南社会科学,2024,32(9):65-75. [11]郭跃文,李源,陈志明,等.新型举国体制强化国家战略科技力量的机理与路径[J].南方经济,2025(6):1-15. [12]贺德方,陈涛,刘辉,等.科技创新与产业创新深度融合的政策实践与对策分析[J].中国科学院院刊,2025,40(5):781-794. [13]邵云飞,陈燕萍,吴晓波,等.从“研发”到“市场”:链主企业如何实现关键核心技术的商业化[J].管理世界,2024,40(12):19-43. [14]李昱璇,方卫华.“卡脖子”技术概念辨析:内生性矛盾、国家主体与外部限制的共同建构[J].科学学研究,2024,42(1):31-37,135. [15]李树文,罗瑾琏,张志菲.从定位双星到布局寰宇:专精特新企业如何借助关键核心技术突破实现价值共创[J].南开管理评论,2024,27(3):94-107. [16]张玉臣,谭礼.关键核心技术的概念界定、特征辨析及突破路径[J].中国科技论坛,2023(2):20-29. [17]曹琨,吴新年,白光祖,等.基于“科学-技术”复杂网络的关键核心技术识别研究:以数控机床领域为例[J].数据分析与知识发现,2025,9(3):42-55. [18]ZHAO S,ABBASSI W,HUNJRA A I,et al.How do government R&D subsidies affect corporate green innovation choices:Perspectives from strategic and substantive innovation[J].International Review of Economics and Finance,2024,93:1378-1396. [19]ZHANG F,YANG B,ZHU L.Digital technology usage,strategic flexibility,and business model innovation in traditional manufacturing firms:The moderating role of the institutional environment[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2023,194:122726. [20]汤志伟,李昱璇,张龙鹏.中美贸易摩擦背景下“卡脖子”技术识别方法与突破路径:以电子信息产业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(1):1-9. [21]LIU Y,LI J,LIU J S,et al.A Government-Subsidies Incentive Mechanism for Research and Development of Industrial Generic Technologies[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2023,70(6):2305-2319. [22]葛爽,柳卸林.我国关键核心技术组织方式与研发模式分析:基于创新生态系统的思考[J].科学学研究,2022,40(11):2093-2101. [23]陈志远,张杰,孙昊,等.创新链和产业链融合下的产业政策[J].经济研究,2024,59(9):154-172. [24]王庆金,吕梦琪,郑思齐,等.合作伙伴动态性对企业关键核心技术突破的影响[J/OL].软科学,1-13[2025-10-23].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/51.1268.G3.20250717.1656.002. [25]张羽飞,刘兵,原长弘.科技领军企业如何突破关键核心技术:基于产学研融合视角的双案例研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45(12):88-105. [26]张羽飞,张树满,刘兵.产学研深度融合影响领军企业关键核心技术突破能力的理论分析与实证检验[J].管理学报,2024,21(4):568-576,615. [27]杜亚光,何瑛,郭檬楠,等.隐形冠军的价值效应:企业专精特新转型与全要素生产率[J].管理评论,2025,37(7):29-43. [28]余维臻,陈立峰,刘锋.后发情境下创业企业如何成为“独角兽”:颠覆性创新视角的探索性案例研究[J].科学学研究,2021,39(7):1267-1276. [29]汪蕾,张剑虎.瞪羚企业认定是否提高了企业创新质量[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(8):102-108. [30]蒋欣娟,吴福象,丛海彬.异质性研发、知识溢出与企业创新产出:基于创新链视角的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(24):80-89. [31]李琼,汪德华.支持中小微企业创新的财政税收政策梳理与借鉴[J].财经问题研究,2022(3):72-82. [32]张艺,陈凯华,周志勇.后发国家产业核心技术追赶的产学研合作创新机制:基于中国高铁产业的案例分析[J].管理世界,2024,40(11):20-48. [33]ZEMLICKIENE V,TURSKIS Z.Evaluation of the expediency of technology commercialization:a case of information technology and biotechnology[J].Technological and Economic Development of Economy,2020,26(1):271-289. [34]ZHANG Y,MENG Q,LIU D,et al.Venture capital and technology commercialization:Evidence from China[J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2024,49(6):2336-2388. [35]谢永珍,吴龙吟.组织双元:演进路径与理论模型[J].东南学术,2020(6):119-129,247. [36]向仙虹,艾光帅,王子菁.政府创新补贴对企业新质生产力的影响研究[J].技术经济,2025,44(3):51-65. [37]GROWIEC J.The world technology frontier:What can we learn from the US States[J].Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,2012,74(6):777-807. [38]YANG J.Information-theoretic model of induced technical change:Theory and empirics[J].Metroeconomica,2023,74(1):2-39. [39]张艺,陈凯华,周志勇.后发国家产业核心技术追赶的产学研合作创新机制:基于中国高铁产业的案例分析[J].管理世界,2024,40(11):20-48. [40]余义勇,杨忠.从追赶到前沿:后发企业自主创新能力演化路径研究:基于“政府-市场”双元驱动视角[J].南京社会科学,2023(12):25-35. [41]熊凯军.政府研发补贴、非研发补贴对企业创新产出的影响[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2023,25(6):26-35. [42]姚聪聪.“资本无序扩张”:样态透视、实质批判及治理策略[J].新疆社会科学,2022(4):63-72. [43]孙晓华,唐卓伟,马雪娇,等.知识产权制度渐进式改革之路:“有为政府”与“有效市场”的协同演进[J].经济研究,2024,59(9):136-153. [44]马松林,覃事建.显示面板制造装备国产化的思考与行动[J].中国科学院院刊,2025,40(5):904-912.
2025, 
