Behavioral Logic of International Organizations' Participation in Science and Technology Policy Innovation
Wu Jiaqi1, Tan Shuang2, Hu Xiangming3
1. School of Government,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China; 2. School of Law and Humanities,China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing,Beijing 100083,China; 3. School of Public Administration,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China
Abstract：International organizations present a unique behavioral logic in the process of participating in the development of science and technology policies of member countries.Based on vivid practice of international organizations in promoting hydrogen energy in China,the analysis framework of “technology foundation-project design-process control-advocacy performance”is constructed.Through a deep description of international organizations'participation and advocacy in science and technology policy innovation,we find that international organizations directly act in the field of science and technology policy through precise gap mining,fully focused policy advocacy and cross-country experience interaction.International organizations also indirectly supply the source of living water for science and technology policy innovation through multi-field knowledge production,wide-ranging softening suggestions,and sustainable capacity development.The core behavioral logic of international organizations'participation in science and technology policy innovation is that “balancing hardness with softness”and “connecting internal and external”.This paper seeks to explore the uniqueness of the functions of international organizations in China's science and technology policy innovation field and explore the way forward for their participation in science and technology policy innovation.
武佳奇, 谭爽, 胡象明. 国际组织参与科技政策创新的行为逻辑[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(12): 159-168.
Wu Jiaqi, Tan Shuang, Hu Xiangming. Behavioral Logic of International Organizations' Participation in Science and Technology Policy Innovation. , 2022(12): 159-168.
[1]饶戈平.论全球化进程中的国际组织[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005. [2]入江昭.全球共同体:国际组织在当代世界形成中的角色[M].刘青,颜子龙,李静阁,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009. [3]宋婉贞.国际移民组织与联合国难民署在东南亚难民救助中的合作[J].国际政治研究,2019 (2):87-114. [4]吴建南,马亮,杨宇谦.中国地方政府创新的动因、特征与绩效——基于 “中国地方政府创新奖”的多案例文本分析[J].管理世界,2007 (8):43-51. [5]黄扬,陈天祥.街头官僚如何推动政策创新——基层卫生服务领域中的创新案例研究[J].公共管理学报,2020 (4):74-86. [6]朱旭峰,王海渊.国际组织在政策转移中的作用研究——以UNDP参与中国小额信贷政策为例[J].中国行政管理,2012 (2):45-49. [7]AKHTAR-SCHUSTER M,AMIRASLANI F,MOREJON CFD,et al.Designing a new science-policy communication mechanism for the UN Convention to combat desertification[J].Environmental science and policy,2016 (63):122-131. [8]BELAND D,MITCHELL A O.International organizations as policy actors:an ideational approach[J].Global social policy,2013,13 (2):125-143. [9]JOHN W.Agendas,alternatives,and public policies[M].Peking University Press,1995. [10]CAROL S,WEISSER T.Policy entrepreneurs,policy opportunists,and legislative effectiveness[J].American politics pesearch,1991,19 (2):262-274. [11]KING P J,ROBERTS NANCY C.An investigation into the personality profile of policy entrepreneurs[J].Public productivity & management review,1992,16 (2):173-190. [12]金锦萍.科学慈善运动与慈善的转型[J].科学对社会的影响,2009 (2):48-52. [13]牛可.美国国家构建过程中的科学公益[J].文化纵横,2020 (5):75-85. [14]谭爽.草根NGO如何成为政策企业家——垃圾治理场域中的历时观察[J].公共管理学报,2019,16 (2):79-90. [15]贺滟淋.改革开放以来联合国开发计划署对中国扶贫的积极影响[D].北京:北京外国语大学,2017:24. [16]MUKHERJEE I,HOWLETT M.Who is a stream? Epistemic communities,instrument constituencies and advocacy coalitions in public policy-making[J].Politics and governance.2015,3 (2):65-75. [17]HOWLETT M,MCCONNELL A,PERL A.Moving policy theory forward:connecting multiple stream and advocacy calition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis[J].Australian journal of public administration,2017,76 (1):65-79. [18]赵琦.基层政策企业家如何实现政策的创新与制度化——基于温岭参与式预算的改革实践分析[J].公共行政评论,2020,13 (3):152-171. [19]ZHANG C.Non-governmental organisations'policy advocacy in China:resources,government intention and network[J].China an international journal,2015 (13):181-199. [20]MICHELSON E S.Science philanthropy,energy systems research,and societal responsibility:a match made for the 21st century[J].Energy research & social science,2021,72 (9):101886. [21]BAUMGARTNER F,BRYAN D.Agendas andinstability in american politics[M].Chicago:Chicago University Press,1993. [22]DOLOWITZ D P,MARSH D.Learning from abroad:the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making[J].Governance,2000,13 (1):5-23. [23]杨辉.科技决策相关公共知识生产模式的演变[J].自然辩证法研究,2016,32 (8):51-56. [24]刘崇俊.STS “参与转向”中技科学的协同治理研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2019,35 (10):50-54. [25]谭爽.从知识遮蔽到知识共塑:我国邻避项目决策的范式优化[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2019 (6):84-91. [26]ROWLEY J.The wisdom hierarchy:representations of the DIKW hierarchy[J].Journal of information science,2010,33 (2):163-180. [27]陈建国.金登 “多源流分析框架”述评[J].理论探讨,2008 (1):125-128. [28]BEKKERS V,TUMMERS L,VOORBERG W.From public innovation to social innovation in the public sector:a literature review of relevant drivers and barriers[C].EGPA 2013 conference (320090). [29]ARNOLD G,LONG N,GOTTLIEB M.Social networks and policy entrepreneurship:how relationships shape municipal decision making about high-volume hydraulic fracturing[J].Policy studies journal,2017,45 (3):414-441. [30]MICHAEL M.Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation[J].American journal of political science,1997,41 (3):738-770. [31]OHEMENG F,KAMGA O.Administrative leaders as institutional entrepreneurs in developing countries:a study of the development and institutionalization of performance management in Ghana's public service[J].Public administration and development,2020,40 (1):87-100.
2022, 
