跨学科学术评价指标PR8和FNII的构建及实证研究——以河南省高校哲学社会科学评价为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6174 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract There has not yet established a convincing indicator system at home and abroad for interdisciplinary evaluation of scholarly and institutional scientific research.Based on the percentile ranking of citations of academic papers in the discipline,the PR8 indicator was established.Based on the citations and downloads of the papers,the field normalization impact indicator(FNII)was established,aiming to achieve interdisciplinary evaluation of scholars and institutions.Taking the philosophy and social science of Henan province as an example,we used the PR8 and FNII to appraise the performance of philosophy and social science research of Henan universities respectively,and screen out the top 50 scholars of philosophy and social sciences in Henan province.The PR8 and FNII were used to evaluate the performance of different disciplines,and the top 20 scholars were selected(Only the evaluation results of management discipline are given in this paper)

Key words： Percentile indicator Field normalization impact indicator Interdisciplinary evaluation Scholar evaluation University evaluation

Received: 16 February 2017

PACS:

G301

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Xueli
	Sheng Lina
	Dong Jianjun
	Fang Hongling
	Fu Zhongjing
	Wang Yan
	Zhou Zhixin

Cite this article:

Liu Xueli,Sheng Lina,Dong Jianjun, et al. The Building and Empirical Research on PR8 and FNII:——An Example of Philosophy and Social Science of Henan Province in China[J]. , 2017, 0(12): 53-65.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2017/V0/I12/53

[1]武书连,吕嘉,郭石林.2010中国大学评价[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(4):5-13.
[2]刘雪立,周晶,盖双双.C9 高校学科建设的绩效评价与预测——基于ESI 和InCites 数据库[J].中国科技论坛,2016(5):130-135.
[3]刘雪立,张诗乐,盖双双.基于论文产出的科研绩效评价——ESI 和InCites 应用研究综述[J].现代情报,2016,36(3):172-177.
[4]张灵阁,韩明杰,赵勇,等.英澳新三国高等学校科研评价体系的比较及启示[J].中国科技论坛,2017(1):179-185.
[5]VINKLER P.Comparative rank assessment of journal articles[J].Journal of informetrics,2013,7(3):712-717.
[6]陈仕吉,史丽文,李冬梅,等.论文被引频次标准化述评[J].现代图书情报技术,2012(4):54-60.
[7]张学梅,李华.跨学科领域期刊评价指标PRP指数及其改进研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(2):50-53.
[8]俞立平.影响因子百分位指标的特点研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(10):103-107.
[9]LEYDESDORFF L.Alternatives to the journal impact factor:I3 and the top-10%(or top-25%)of the most-highly cited papers[J].Scientometrics,2012,92(2):355-365.
[10]LEYDESDORFF L,BORNMANN L.Integrated impact indicatorscompared with impact factors:an alternative research design with policy implications[J].J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol,2011,62(11):2133-2146.
[11]BORNMANN L,MUTZ R.Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance:the avoidance of citation averages in field-normalization[J].J Informtr,2011,5(1):228-230.
[12]National Science Board.Science and engineering indicators:2010[EB/OL].[2012-06-01].http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/pdf/seind10.pdf.
[13]VINKLER P.The use of thepercentage rank position index tor comparative evaluation of journals[J].J Intormetr,2014,8(2):340-348.
[14]刘雪立,周晶,盖双双,盛丽娜,付中静,董建军,方红玲.基于被引频次分布特征的影响因子缺陷矫正——位置指标应用于期刊评价的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(9):1-8.
[15]LIU X L,FANG H L,WANG M Y.Correlation between download and citation and download-citation deviation phenomenon for some papers in Chinese medical journals[J].Serials review,2011,37(3):157-161.
[16]Change for the better the 2011-12 rankings even more accurate and comprehensive[EB/OL].http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2011—2012/analysis-rankings-methodology.html.
[17]汤建民.大学排行榜的改进之策[J].高教发展与评估,2016,32(4):1-5.
[18]方红玲.我国科技期刊论文被引量和下载量峰值年代——多学科比较研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(5)708-710.
[19]刘雪立.中文核心期刊评价指标体系:演进·问题·建议[J].编辑学报,2014(01):92-95.
[20]刘雪立,方红玲,苗媛,等.五种综合性眼科学期刊论文下载量与被引量的关系及部分论文的量引背离现象[J].中国科技期刊研究,2010,21(5)629-632.
[21]VAN RAAN J.Sleeping beauties in science[J].Scientometrics,2004,59(3):467-472.