|
|
|
| The Basic Research or the Applied Research:Innovation Field and Innovation Choice of the Later Developing Country |
| Sheng Yanchao1,2, Ouyang Yao2 |
1.School of Travel Management,Hunan Commerce University,Changsha 410205,China;
2.Regional Strategy and Planning Research Base,Hunan Commerce University,Changsha 410205,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the classic A-J model,the paper studied the technical innovation field and the technical innovation model in the later developing countries.The technical innovation model of the developing countries' enterprises depends on cost coefficient in the basic research innovation and the protection of the intellectual property rights.When the coefficient is in a suitable range,the enterprises tend to adopt the cooperation innovative model.When the spillover effect between the enterprises is relatively large,the enterprises tend to invest in the application research field;when the technical spillover effect between the enterprises is relatively small,the enterprises tend to invest in the basic research field;and when the coefficient is small,the enterprises tend to carry out the independent innovation,and focus on the basic research field;and when the coefficient is relatively large,the enterprise is willing to take the independent innovation mode,and invests in the basic research field.The conclusions offer that the country should carry out the classification of different enterprises according to the different industries,market structure,the ability.
|
|
Received: 20 January 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]BARRO Robert,SALA I-martin X.Technological diffusion,con-vergencc,and growth[J].Journal of economic growth,1997(2):1-27.
[2]生延超.要素,技术能力与技术赶超方式的演变[J].财贸研究,2010,30(5):46-54.
[3]TISSEN J H.Individualism,collectivism,and entrepreneur ship:a frame work for international comparative research[J].Journal of business venturing,1997,12(5):367-384.
[4]CHENY Nakata,SIVAKUMAR K.National culture and new product development:an integrative review[J].Journal of marketing,1996,60(1):61-72.
[5]PAUL Bierly,JOSEPH E Coombs.Equity alliance,stages of product development and alliance instability[J].Journal of engineering and technology management,2004(12):191-214.
[6]原正行,桥本寿郎.全球化时代的日本经济[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2003.
[7]LEE K,LIM C.Technological regimes,catching-up and leapfrogging:indings from Korean industries[J].Research policy,2001(30):459-483.
[8]生延超.创新投入补贴还是产品补贴:政府的技术联盟策略选择[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(6):184-192.
[9]张世龙,吴超群,马尚平.技术突变下后发国家的企业自主创新环境及其优化[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(12):76-79.
[10]易先忠.后发不均质大国技术创新能力提升模式与政策机制研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013.
[11]PAVITT M.Sectoral patterns of technical change:towards a taxonomy and a theory[J].Research policy,1984(6):25-76.
[12]KEUN Lee,CHAISUIG Lim.Technological regime,catching-up and leapfrogging:findings from the Korean industries[J].Research policy,2001(30):459-483.
[13]ASPREMONT D,JACQUEMIN Alexis.Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American economics review,1988,78,1133-1137.
[14]ASPREMONT D,JACQUEMIN Alexis.Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in a duopoly with spillovers:erratum[J].American economic review,1990,80(3):641-642.
[15]李君华,欧阳峣.大国效应、交易成本和经济结构[J].经济研究,2016(10):27-40.
[16]易先忠,张亚斌.技术差距、知识产权与后发国技术进步[J].数量经济与技术经济研究,2006(10):64-81.
[17]骆品亮.虚拟研发组织的治理结构[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2006.
[18]陈琦,欧阳峣.发展中大国技术创新溢出效应及比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2013(04):149-154.
[19]林毅夫.论有为政府和有限政府[N].第一财经日报,2016-11-06. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 0 
