|
|
|
| Reforms of the Bayh-Dole Act's March-in Right and the Revelation for China |
| Chen Yingxin, Li Shiqi, Zhou Yue |
| School of Public Affairs& Law,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 in the United Sates grants federal agencies the power to force the recipients of federal research funding to license the resulting inventions to third parties.There have been five significant march-in petitions since the Bayh-Dole Act was implemented,but each petition was failed.American scholars believe that a few reforms to the system could help balance the march-in system's design and protect the public interest.Reforms include instituting an appeal process,mandating a duty of “best efforts” to commercialize subject inventions and report on those efforts,clarifying the meaning of the Bayh-Dole act's “reasonable terms”requirement,and mandating auctions for licenses on subject inventions.This article drew lessons from the experience of legislation and reform of the Bayh-Dole march-in rights to provide new ideas for the further improvement of China's Science and Technology Law
|
|
Received: 21 September 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]RYNOLDS W H.Reforming patent law[N].New York Times,1980-09-15,(A23).
[2]Bayh-Dole Act,Pub.L.No.96-517,94 Stat.3015(1980)[EB/OL].(2014-12-17)[2016-04-15]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayh%E2%80%93Dole_Act
[3]35 U.S.C.§203-March-in rights[EB/OL].(2015-05-15)[2016-03-19]http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/zh/text.jsp?file_id=371712.
[4]37 C.F.R.§ 401.6-Exercise of march-in rights[EB/OL].(2013-03-16)[2016-05-12].https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/37/401.6.
[5]Congressional Budget Office of the United States Congress.Federal Support for Rreserch and Development[R/OL].(2007-06-18)[2016-04-22].http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/ftpdocs/82xx/doc8221/06-18-research.pdf
[6]Determination in the Case of Petition of Cell Pro,Inc.[EB/OL].(1997-08-01)[2016-03-28].https://www.ott.nih.gov/sites/default/files/documents/policy/cellpro-marchin.pdf.
[7]黄光辉.美国拜杜法案中的介入权制度:迷失与反思[J].湖北行政学院学报,2015(06):81-86.
[8]National Institutes of Health Office of the Director Determination in the Case of Norvir Manufactured by Abbvie[EB/OL].(2013-11-1)[2016-05-12].https://www.ott.nih.gov/sites/default/files/documents/policy/March-In-Norvir2013.pdf
[9]BROWN David.Group says U.S.should claim AIDS drug patents[N].The Washington Post,2004-05-26(A04).
[10]Petition to use the Bayh-Dole act to promote access to fabrazyme from C.Allen Black,Jr.[EB/OL].(2010-08-02)[2016-05-09].http://keionline.org/sites/default/files/fabrazyme_petition_2aug2010.doc
[11]United States Government Accountability Office.Information on the government's right to assert ownership control over federally funded inventions[R/OL].(2009-07-27)[2016-04-30].http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09742.pdf.
[12]DAL BÓ Ernesto.Regulatory capture:a review[J].Oxford review of economic policy,2006,203:214-215.
[13]LAFFONT J J,TIROLE J.The politics of government decision-making:a theory of regulatory capture[J].Quarterly journal of economics,1991,106(4):1089-1127.
[14]孙成.政府资助项目专利权归属中的政府介入权研究[D].华南理工大学,2014.
[15]贾无志,吴希.国家科技计划成果之政府介入权初探[J].中国基础科学,2014(03):27-32+36. |
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 5 
