|
|
|
| Analysis on the Focuses and Main Disputes in the Ongoing Forth Amendment of Chinas Patent Law |
| Zhan Ying |
| Research Center for IPRs of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The main disputes in ongoing fourth amendment of Chinas patent law include:strengthening the patent administrative protection,expanding authority of patent administrative agency,introducing punitive damages,and confirming the decision of patent invalidation request for review becoming effective immediately.Although our current patent protection is ineffective,however,to strengthen the protection of patent administration is not the right path to solve problems.To solve the“low compensation”problem,it is necessary to adopt punitive damages,but also need to guard against the possible birth of “patent trolls” and other negative effects.The amendment draft clarifies that the decision of patent invalidation request to review with immediate effect,but the necessity and feasibility of this modification are questionable.Establishment of intellectual property court is probably more effective solution
|
|
Received: 27 April 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]赵建国.聚焦新一轮专利法修改[N].知识产权报,2013-06-24.
[2]李红娟.《专利法》第四次修改(征求意见稿)的理论分析[J].中国政法大学学报,2013,(6):100-107.
[3]蒋志培.对专利法第四次修改的要点和立法趋向分析 要改变“司法保护为主”政策？[EB/OL],http://www.chinaiprlaw.cn/file/2012082125141.html,2015-05-30.
[4]易健雄,邓宏光.应在知识产权领域引入惩罚性赔偿[J].法律适用,2009,(4):92-95.
[5]钱玉文,骆福林.论我国知识产权法中的惩罚性赔偿[J].法学杂志,2009,(4):112-114.
[6]和育东等.知识产权侵权引入惩罚性赔偿之辩[J].知识产权,2013,(4):54-59.
[7]曹新明.知识产权侵权惩罚性赔偿责任探析[J].知识产权,2013,(4):3-9.
[8]温世扬,邱永清.惩罚性赔偿与知识产权保护[J].法律适用,2004,(12):50-51.
[9]张广良.知识产权侵权民事救济[M].北京:法律出版社,2003:156.
[10]李晓秋.专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度:引入抑或摒弃[J].法商研究,2013,(4):136-144. |
|
|
|
2015, Vol. 0 
