知识工作者的异质性居住区位偏好研究——以北京科研、工程及艺术型工作者为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (3947 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Knowledge workers,as an important innovation factor,are the key driving force for Beijing to build an international center for technology and innovation.Thus,it is necessary to examine their residential location preferences to enhance their well-being and innovation vitality.Based on 1067 individual-level questionnaires from knowledge workers acquired in 2021 and Amap POI data in Beijing,this paper investigates the residential location preferences among analytical,synthetic,and symbolic knowledge workers,by integrating the revealed preference and the implicit importance.The study finds that analytical and symbolic workers relatively prioritize quality location factors(e.g.social and cultural facilities)in their residential choices,where as synthetic worker splace greater relative emphasis on classic location factors(e.g.medical facilities).These conclusions may provide effective policy recommendations for promoting residential satisfaction of knowledge workers in Beijing.

Key words： Knowledge worker Knowledge typology Residential location Revealed preference Residential satisfaction

Received: 05 June 2024

PACS:

K901.2

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Xi
	Yao Huiping
	Zhao Juanjuan

Cite this article:

Li Xi,Yao Huiping,Zhao Juanjuan. The Heterogeneous Residential Locational Preference Among Knowledge Workers——Taking Analytical-Synthetic-Symbolic Knowledge Workers in Beijing as an Example[J]. , 2025, 6(5): 109-119.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I5/109

[1] SIMMIE J.Knowledge spillovers and reasons for the concentration of innovative SMEs[J].Urban Studies,2002,39(5/6):885-902.
[2] 赵娟娟.知识工作者[J].城市与区域规划研究,2018,10(1):12-25.
[3] FLORIDA R.The rise of the creative class[M].NewYork:Basic Books,2019.
[4] BEREITSCHAFT B.Do“creative”and“non-creative”workers exhibit similar preferences for urban amenities? An exploratory case study of Omaha,Nebraska[J].Journal of Urbanism:International Research on Place making and Urban Sustainability,2017,10:198-216.
[5] ZENKER S.Who's your target? The creative class as a target group for place branding[J].Journal of Place Management and Development,2009,2(1):23-32.
[6] FRENKEL A,BENDIT E,KAPLAN S.Residential location choice of knowledge-workers:The role of amenities,workplace and lifestyle[J].Cities,2013,35:33-41.
[7] LAWTON P,MURPHY E,REDMOND D.Residential preferences of the “creative class”[J].Cities,2013,31:47-56.
[8] ASHEIM B,HANSEN H K.Knowledgebases,talents,and contexts:On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden[J].Economic Geography,2009,85(4):425-442.
[9] TIMMERMANS H,MOLIN E,VAN NOORTWIJK L.Housing choice processes:Stated versus revealed modelling approaches[J].Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,1994,9(3):215-227.
[10] STORPER M,MANVILLE M.Behaviour,preferences and cities:Urban theory and urban resurgence[J].Urban Studies,2006,43(8):1247-1274.
[11] KIM J H,PAGLIARA F,PRESTON J.The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour[J].Urban Studies,2005,42(9):1621-1636.
[12] MCCREA R,SHYY T-K,STIMSON R J.Satisfied residents in different types of local areas:Measuring what's most important[J].Social Indicators Research,2014,118(1):87-101.
[13] GROGAN-KAYLOR A C,WOOLLEY M E,MOWBRAY C T,et al.Predictors of neighborhood satisfaction[J].Journal of Community Practice,2006,14:27-50.
[14] ZHAO J,BENTLAGE M,THIERSTEIN A.Residence,workplace and commute:Interrelated spatial choices of knowledge workers in the metropolitan region of Munich[J].Journal of Transport Geography,2017,62:197-212.
[15] 王丽艳,季奕,王咿瑾.城市创意人才居住选址偏好研究:基于天津市微观调查与大数据的实证分析[J].管理学刊,2019,32(5):30-37.
[16] HUNT J D,MCMILLAN J,ABRAHAM J E.Stated preference investigation of influences on attractiveness of residential locations[J].Transportation Research Record,1994,1466:79-87.
[17] 申悦,傅行行.社区主客观特征对社区满意度的影响机理:以上海市郊区为例[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(5):686-697.
[18] LOVEJOY K,HANDY S,MOKHTARIAN P.Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments:An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2010,97(1):37-48.
[19] CAO X.How does neighborhood design affect life satisfaction? Evidence from Twin Cities[J].Travel Behaviour and Society,2016,5:68-76.
[20] CAO X,WU X,YUAN Y.Examiningbuilt environmental correlates of neighborhood satisfaction:A focus on analysis approaches[J].Journal of Planning Literature,2018,33(4):419-432.
[21] DENG W.Using a revised importance-performance analysis approach:The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism[J].Tourism Management,2007,28(5):1274-1284.
[22] MATZLER K,BAILOM F,HINTERHUBER H H,et al.The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction:A reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2004,33(4):271-277.
[23] STORPER M,VENABLES A J.Buzz:Face-to-face contact and the urban economy[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2004,4(4):351-370.
[24] SPENCER M.Knowledge Neighbourhoods:Urbanform and evolutionary economic geography[J].Regional Studies,2015,49(5):883-898.
[25] PINA K,TETHER B S.Towards understanding variety in knowledge intensive business services by distinguishing their knowledge bases[J].Research Policy,2016,45(2):401-413.
[26] ASHEIM B T,BOSCHMA R,COOKE P.Constructingregional advantage:Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases[J].Regional Studies,2011,45(7):893-904.
[27] 何奇瑾,周广胜.我国夏玉米潜在种植分布区的气候适宜性研究[J].地理学报,2011,66(11):1443-1450.
[28] 张力,李雪铭,张建丽.基于生态位理论的居住区位及居住空间分异[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(12):1548-1554.
[29] 单玉红.基于土地生态位和多主体的城市居住空间演化情景模型研究[D].武汉:武汉大学,2009.
[30] 刘振生,高惠,滕丽微,等.基于MAXENT模型的贺兰山岩羊生境适宜性评价[J].生态学报,2013,33(22):7243-7249.
[31] 赵宇,王佳冠,陈超,等.基于MaxEnt生态位模型软件对云南柠檬适宜种植区预测[J].昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版),2021,46(2):88-95.
[32] 康雷,张文忠,杨兆萍,等.北京城市建成环境对居民宜居满意度的影响[J].人文地理,2020,35(5):52-60.
[33] 孔维尧,李欣海,邹红菲.最大熵模型在物种分布预测中的优化[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(6):2116-2128.
[34] 李一琳,丁长青.基于GIS和MaxEnt技术对濒危物种褐马鸡的保护空缺分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(11):34-41.