科技创新风险的刑法规制——以新质生产力的法治保障为切入点

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1097 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In the context of the development of new quality productive forces oriented to scientific and technological innovation,the criminal law simultaneously presents the reverse phenomenon of over-criminalization of scientific research and under-protection of the transformation of scientific research results.The former is in the preventive legislation that expands the legal infringement of scientific and technological research,and the strict justice that confuses the determination of scientific research fund management in the crime of embezzlement.The latter is manifested in the legislation of patent crime that excessively restricts the establishment standard of constitutive elements,which results in the judicial practice that rarely applies the crime of counterfeiting patents.In this regard,the criminal law needs to reflect on the expansion of criminalization for scientific and technological research,the strict criminalization of scientific research funds management,scientific and technological patent infringement civil remedy theory,and other established views.The principle of freedom of scientific research requires the addition of elements of scientific and technological ethical scrutiny about relative crimes,so as to exclude acts that do not involve a general need for prevention and a substantial risk of harm to legal interests.The principle of weighing interests requires that not only the extension of“official”and“public property”should be clarified to limit the application of the crime of embezzlement,but also“the purpose of illegal possession”should be globally recognized to distinguish between the illegal use of scientific research funds and the crime of embezzlement.The patent protection mechanism of scientific and technological innovation under the principle of public welfare protection requires that the criminal law should expand the constituent elements of the crime of patent counterfeiting,set up the second level of statutory penalties,and create crimes related to the infringement of patent rights.

Key words： New quality productive forces Scientific and technological innovation Freedom of scientific research Public interest Criminal protection.

Received: 03 July 2023

PACS:

D924.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Chu Chencheng
	Liu Yang

Cite this article:

Chu Chencheng,Liu Yang. Criminal Regulation of the Risk of Scientific and Technological Innovation——Taking the Rule of Law Safeguards for New Quality Productive Forces as an Entry Point[J]. , 2025, 6(5): 10-20.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I5/10

[1] 王攀,肖思思,周颖.聚焦“基因编辑婴儿”[N].人民日报,2019-12-31(11).
[2] 叶俊.高校反腐:“苍蝇”“老虎”一起打[N].民主与法制时报,2014-08-04(6).
[3] 最高人民检察院.检察机关依法惩治侵犯著作权犯罪典型案例[EB/OL].(2024-01-05)[2024-05-29].https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/dxal/202401/t20240105_639390.shtml.
[4] 前田雅英.法秩序の統一性と刑法解釈[J].東京都立大学法学会法学会雑誌,2023,63(2):1-25.
[5] 今村暢好.行政刑法の特殊性と諸問題[J].松山大学論集,2011,23(4):154-189.
[6] 蒋悟真.科研项目经费治理入法的机遇、难点与模式[J].法学杂志,2020,41(7):36-45.
[7] ZHENG T.Judicial enforcement of intellectual property rights in China:From technical improvement to institutional reform[J].Asia Pacific Law Review,2019,27(1):176-197.
[8] 山田洋.リスクと協働の行政法[M].東京:信山社出版,2012.
[9] 乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会:新的现代性之路[M].张文杰,何博闻,译,南京:译林出版社,2018.
[10] 解志勇.生命伦理法的建构[J].比较法研究,2024(1):1-20.
[11] 胡志斌,刘紫良,孙超.学术不端行为的刑法规制研究[J].学术界,2011(10):39-47.
[12] 莫洪宪,贺志军.国家经济安全视角下我国知识产权之刑事保护:对“专利侵权罪”增设论之否定[J].法学论坛,2008(1):114-120.
[13] 黄玉烨,戈光应.非法实施专利行为入罪论[J].法商研究,2014,31(5):41-49.
[14] 成嶋隆.学問の自由と市民社会[J].日本の科学者,2021,56(5):36-41.
[15] 王德志.论我国学术自由的宪法基础[J].中国法学,2012(5):5-23.
[16] 韩大元,钱坤.论科技共识和宪法共识[J].中国人民大学学报,2024,38(1):114-125.
[17] 服部寛.利益法学から評価法学への展開に関する一考察[J].法學,2009,73(4):520-575.
[18] 高金桂.利益衡量与刑法之犯罪判断[M].台北:元照出版社,2000.
[19] 储陈城.自动汽车程序设计中解决“电车难题”的刑法正当性[J].环球法律评论,2018,40(3):82-99.
[20] BRYAN A G.Black's law dictionary[M].Eagan:West Publishing Corporation,2009.
[21] 马寅翔.规范保护目的与构成要件解释[J].中外法学,2021,33(2):425-445.
[22] 储槐植,唐风玉.刑事一体化视域中专利权保护问题研究[J].河北法学,2023,41(9):2-18.
[23] 石晶.生命科技风险的宪法回应[J].法学,2023(2):47-61.
[24] 乔尔·范伯格.刑法的道德界限:对他人的损害[M].方泉,译,北京:商务印书馆,2013.
[25] 生田勝義.刑罰の一般的抑止力と刑法理諭:批判的一考察[J].立命館法学,2005,2/3:24-44.
[26] 徐东波.人工智能驱动科学研究的逻辑、风险及其治理[J].中国科技论坛,2024(5):120-129.
[27] 谭启平.习近平科技创新重要论述的法治化意义[J].东方法学,2024(2):4-17.
[28] 姜涛.基因编辑之刑法规制及其限度[J].东方法学,2021(2):69-85.
[29] 姜涛.科研人员的刑法定位:从宪法教义学视域的思考[J].中国法学,2017(1):170-188.
[30] 刘科.高校科研经费腐败犯罪中的疑难问题研究[J].江西社会科学,2023,43(11):124-131.
[31] 何荣功.非法占有目的与诈骗案件的刑民界分[J].中国刑事法杂志,2020(3):21-36.
[32] 王志祥,吴超莹.论法秩序统一原理视野下假冒专利罪的成立范围[J].法学杂志,2023,44(4):131-142.
[33] 于改之,吕小红.比例原则的刑法适用及其展开[J].现代法学,2018,40(4):136-149.