能力为王还是流量至上:全球科技智库成果产出的信息影响因素模型研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1901 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Science and technology think tank is the operator and vane of national science and technology information service provision and science and technology ability improvement.Systematically sorting out the factors affecting the output of science and technology think tank is of positive significance for the rational planning and scientific development of science and technology think tank in China.Based on the theoretical framework of information ecosystem and Delphi method,this paper constructs a system of influencing factors for the achievement output of science and technology think tanks.58 science and technology think tanks around the world are selected as empirical research objects,and QCA method is adopted to determine the univariate necessity and condition combination path of influencing factors for the achievement output of science and technology think tanks.Based on the configuration results obtained from the empirical analysis,the main problems existing in the output of science and technology think tanks in China are sorted out and countermeasures are proposed.The results show that:①The output of science and technology think tank is influenced by a variety of condition variables;②High-output science and technology think tanks can be summarized into two types of path types:independent display type and external attraction type;③To enhance the output of science and technology think tanks,it is necessary to consolidate the foundation of content effectiveness with “capacity building”as the core,and build brand influence with “communication and innovation”as the guidance.Think tank survival emphasizes “ability is king”, think tank development pays attention to “flow first”.

Key words： Technology think tank Outcome output Influence factor model Information ecology QCA

Received: 29 March 2024

PACS:	G322
	C932

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Min
	Liu Huawei
	Jin Linya

Cite this article:

Zhang Min,Liu Huawei,Jin Linya. Is Ability the King or Flow the First:A Study on the Factors Influencing the Output of Global Science and Technology Think Tanks[J]. , 2025, 6(4): 176-188.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V6/I4/176

[1] 刘司可,杨述明,刘长林.影响世界一流高校智库建设的组织因素及创新启示:基于清晰集定性比较分析.科学管理研究,2022,40 (5):46-54.
[2] 王克平,孙华伟,鞠孜涵,等.我国科技智库研究述评.情报科学:1-23.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1264.g2.20230614.1821.030.html.
[3] 韩瑞珍,杨思洛.知识生命周期视角下智库产品影响力形成及提升路径.信息资源管理学报,2020,10 (3):118-124.
[4] 王君,李品.科技情报泄密视角下国外智库涉华科技报告引文分析.情报理论与实践:1-10.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20230313.1359.002.html.
[5] 孙华伟,王克平,张浩川,等.基于大数据思维的科技智库情报服务机制研究.情报理论与实践,2023,46 (1):45-52,71.
[6] 崔惠民,周进杰.论高校智库评价指标体系构建的维度与权重测度.扬州大学学报 (高教研究版),2021,25 (3):18-25.
[7] 王世伟.略论国家高端科技智库的功能定位.情报学报,2018,37 (6):590-599.
[8] 吕旭宁.中国特色新型科技智库管理和运行机制研究.合肥:中国科学技术大学,2020.
[9] 宋姗姗,钟永恒,刘佳,等.产业智库大数据方法体系及其应用场景建设.科技管理研究,2023,43 (6):136-143.
[10] 顾艳.科技期刊的智库服务功能拓展:问题与对策.科技与出版,2023 (4):31-37.
[11] 周湘智.中国特色新型智库发展趋势与走向.智库理论与实践,2022,7 (6):1-10.
[12] 李杰,陶源,冯良珠.俄乌冲突背景下俄罗斯顶级智库涉华评论主题和情感分析.情报杂志:1-8.http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1167.G3.20230509.1134.018.html.
[13] 韩瑞珍,邱均平.智库产品质量标准模型构建研究.重庆大学学报 (社会科学版),2020,26 (2):85-95.
[14] RASTRICK C J.Thinking about Trump:American think tanks and their new political reality.Think Tanks Working Paper Series,2019.
[15] MCGANN J G.Think tanks,foreign policy,and emerging powers.Berlin:Springer,2018.
[16] 郑荣,唐伟航,杨竞雄,等.多元主体协同视角下的智库影响力提升机制研究.情报科学,2020,38 (9):63-68.
[17] 李晓松,蒋玉娇,臧雪珺.智库成果质量影响因素分析及对策研究.科技促进发展,2022,18 (8):968-973.
[18] PÉREZ-PÉREZ J F,PARRA J F,SERRANO-GARCÍA J.A system dynamics model:Transition to sustainable processes.Technology in Society,2021,65 (1):101579.
[19] 宋忠惠,郑军卫,齐世杰,等.基于典型智库实践的智库产品质量控制与影响因素研究.图书与情报,2017,173 (1):128-134.
[20] 刘司可,秦尊文.基于QCA方法的智库成果决策采用撰写要素及其组态研究.情报理论与实践,2023,46 (3):158-165.
[21] MCGANN J G.2020 global go to think tank index report. 2021.
[22] 王世伟.谈谈智库决策建言的 “度”.智库理论与实践,2018,3 (6):12-14,31.
[23] 毛湛文.定性比较分析 (QCA)与新闻传播学研究.国际新闻界,2016,38 (4):6-25.
[25] 王浩.信息生态学视角下科技智库建设研究.现代情报,2018,38 (11):44-47,54.
[25] 周庆山,李瀚瀛,朱建荣,等.信息生态学研究的概况与术语界定初探.图书与情报,2006 (6):24-29.
[26] NARDI B A,O'DAY V L.Information ecologies:Using technology with heart .Cambridge:Mit Press,1999.
[27] 谢守美.知识生态系统知识流动的生态学分析.图书馆学研究,2009 (5):7-10.
[28] 李美娣.信息生态系统的剖析.情报杂志,1998 (4):3-4.
[29] 娄策群,赵桂芹.信息生态平衡及其在构建和谐社会中的作用.情报科学,2006 (11):1606-1610.
[30] FISS P C.A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations.Academy of Management Review,2007 (32):1180-1198.
[31] RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry:Fuzzy sets and beyond.Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2008.
[32] 张春花,孙玉玲,连迎洁.组态视角下智库影响力提升路径研究.情报杂志,2023,42 (3):199-207.
[33] 王勇,刘乐易,迟熙,等.流量博弈与流量数据的最优定价:基于电子商务平台的视角.管理世界,2022,38 (8):116-132.