源头性基础创新过程解析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (2113 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper analyzes and explores concepts,connotations,and characteristics of original basic innovation process,it also analyzes the multiple “valley of death”,process feedback,mechanisms and approaches for growth of original basic innovation niche,and process evaluation in original basic innovation process.The main research conclusions are as follows:①Original basic innovation process is a relay,feedback and interaction process of basic research from 0 to 1,basic innovation products from 1 to 10,and basic innovation diffusion from 10 to 100.Compared to general basic research and innovation processes,the original basic innovation process is original,breakthrough,and disruptive with high risk and uncertainty,which requires long-term persistence and investment;②Because of its foundational and original nature of innovation,original basic innovation can trigger a series of related innovations,form innovation clusters,and promote scientific and technological changes;③There are multiple “valley of death”in original basic innovation process.In practice,setting up protective spaces is conducive to bridging multiple “valley of death”;④The stage-by-stage and classified evaluation are effective means to realize original basic innovation process;⑤original basic innovation process involves multiple aspects of the social system,such as politics,culture,science,technology,market,and industry university research collaboration,and involves the interaction of technology,economic laws,and social laws.

Key words： Basic research from zero to one Original innovation Basic innovation Multiple valley of death Innovation diffusion

Received: 14 March 2024

PACS:

G301

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Jiang

Cite this article:

Wang Jiang. On Original Basic Innovation Process[J]. , 2024, 5(12): 66-76.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I12/66

[1]肖显静.古希腊自然哲学之科学革命论[J].长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,35(5):8-23.
[2]郑雁军.基础研究概念的演变与应用科学之间的关系[J].中国科学基金,2019,33(5):515-519.
[3]ROWLAND H A.A plea for pure science[J].Science,1883,2(29):242-250.
[4]BUSH V.Science and the endless frontier[M].Washington D.C.:National Science Foundation,1945.
[5]SCHMOOKLER J.Invention and economic growth[M].Harvard:University Press,1966.
[6]KLINE S J,ROSENBERG N.An overview of innovation[M]//LANDAUV R,ROSENBERG N.The positive sum strategy:harnessing technology for economic growth.Washington D.C.:National Academy Press.1986.
[7]STOKES D E.Pasteur's quadrant:basic science and technological innovation[M].Washington D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,1997.
[8]JOHANNESSEN J A,DOLVA J O.Organizing innovation:integrating knowledge systems[J].European Planning Studies,1997,5(3):331-349.
[9]HERMANS F,GEERLING E F,POTTERS J,et al.Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments assessingtheir contribution to innovation system function dynamics[J].NJAS(Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences),2018,88(4):76-95.
[10]CHANDLER A.The beginnings of“Big Business”in American industry[J].Business History Review,1959,23:1-31.
[11]MENSCH G,SCHNOPP R.Stalemate in technology,1925-1935:the interplay of stagnation and innovation[M]//SCHRÖDER W H,SPREE R.Historische Konjunkturforschung.Stuttgart:Klett-Cotta,1980.
[12]GOLDENBERG G J,MAZURSKY D,SOLOMON S.Templates oforiginal innovation:projecting original incremental innovations from intrinsic information[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,1999,61(1):1-12.
[13]曹宇轩,粟锋.中国“卡脖子”技术研究述评[J].科技和产业,2022,22(11):38-44.
[14]CORLEY K G,GIOIA D A.Building theory about theory building:what constitutes a theoretical contribution[J].Academy of Management Review,2011,36(1):12-32.
[15]WHETTEN D A.What constitutes a theoretical contribution[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):490-495.
[16]MAHONEY J T,SANCHEZ R.Building new management theory by integrating processes and products of thought[J].Journal of Management Inquiry,2004,13(1):34-47.
[17]张庆芝,雷家骕.基于科学的创新——从诺贝尔奖成果到商业产品的过程研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2018.
[18]DURAND T.Dual technological trees:assessing the intensity and strategic significance of technological Change[J].Research Policy,1992,21:361-380.
[19]徐文伟.从追赶到领先——华为的创新之路[J].中国科学院院刊,2019,34(10):1108-1111.
[20]SCHOT J,GEELS F W.Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys:theory,findings,research agenda and policy[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2008,20(5):537-554.
[21]NARAYANAMURTI V,ODUMOSU T.Cycles of invention and discovery:rethinking the endless frontier[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,2016.
[22]CATARINA C,RUI O,CRISTINA F A,et al.An innovative maturity model to assess supply chain quality management[J].International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,2023,40(1):103-123.
[23]KEMP R,SCHOT J,HOOGMA R.Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation:the approach of strategic niche management[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,1998,10(2):175-198.
[24]HOMMELS A,PETERS P,BIJKER W E.Techno therapy or nurtured niches?Technology studies and the evaluation of radical innovations[J].Research Policy,2007,36(7):1088-1099.