数据跨境流通的三重安全挑战及其法律规制——基于数据流通理论的分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (1070 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In data circulation theory,data circulation is the prerequisite for driving the realization of data value,from the current situation of data cross-border circulation.In fact,the demand of the cross-border use of data globally is increasing constantly,and the corresponding scale of cross-border data circulation transactions is also expanding constantly.In the normalization level,the discourse power game of the international governance regulation of cross-border data circulation is obvious,countries or sovereign regions are trying to dominate the international rules making of cross-border data circulation.China's cross-border data circulation legal rules making must emphasize on security challenges in three aspects.Firstly,it is the privacy and security of data evaluation in the pre circulation link.Secondly,it is the security of data sovereignty during the circulation link.Thirdly,it is the security of data storage in the post circulation link.In order to solve triple security challenges caused by the cross-border data circulation in China,in the pre circulation link,it should clarify the data ownership around the data usufruct system.In circulation link,it should improve the cross-border legal system of domestic data and break through the “long arm jurisdiction”of international rules.In post circulation link,it should construct the all scene data security protection measure to prevent from data leakage.

Key words： Cross-border circulation of data Data sovereignty Privacy security Data storage

Received: 08 July 2023

PACS:	DF96
	DF415

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Chen Yanyu
	Zhang Hanwen

Cite this article:

Chen Yanyu,Zhang Hanwen. Triple Security Challenges and Legal Regulations of Cross-Border Data Circulation in China——Based on the Analysis of Data Circulation Theory[J]. , 2024, 5(8): 64-73.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I8/64

[1]张斌,马海群,商容轩.跨境数据流通特征对政府内外数据互联互通的启示[J].现代情报,2022,42(10):99-109.
[2]董克,吴佳纯,马廷灿.我国数据出境安全风险要素体系研究[J/OL].情报理论与实践:1-15[2024-01-25].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20240115.1347.004.html.
[3]刘芳芳.数据跨境流通三重阻滞因素与中国因应[J].价格理论与实践,2023(3):69-73,134.
[4]井乐.双循环视域下我国跨境电商“新零售”发展探索[J].商业经济研究,2024(2):150-153.
[5]刘妍,冉从敬.金融数据跨境监管的国际策略与中国进路[J].金融评论,2023,15(4):109-126.
[6]夏菡.欧盟数据跨境流动监管立法的市场规制转向及对中国的启示[J].河北法学,2023,41(8):169-182.
[7]叶开儒.数据跨境流动规制中的“长臂管辖”——对欧盟GDPR的原旨主义考察[J].法学评论,2020,38(1):106-117.
[8]龙松熊.论侵害个人信息权益的损害赔偿[J].中国海商法研究,2023,34(4):74-84.
[9]陈元馨,康宁.美国数据跨境流动规制的国内研究观点分析[J].情报杂志,2023,42(4):1-8.
[10]梁洁,冯琼.统一大市场背景下数据要素资源集聚对物流业效率的影响:基于全要素生产率的机制分析[J].商业经济研究,2023(18):81-84.
[11]时业伟.跨境数据流动中的国际贸易规则:规制、兼容与发展[J].比较法研究,2020(4):173-184.
[12]黄宁,李杨.“三难选择”下跨境数据流动规制的演进与成因[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,32(5):172-182,198.
[13]徐瑛晗,纪孟汝.“三同时”制度:个人数据跨境流动风险监管之创新[J].情报杂志,2022,41(7):84-90.
[14]PASQUALE F.The black box society:the secret algorithms that control money and information[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,2015.
[15]姬蕾蕾.企业数据保护的司法困境与破局之维:类型化确权之路[J].法学论坛,2022,37(3):109-121.
[16]The White House.International strategy for cyberspace:prosperity,security,and openness in a networked world[EB/OL].(2011-05-01)[2023-03-30].https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/International_Strategy_Cyberspace_Factsheet.pdf.
[17]Internet Society.Internet way of networking use case:data localization[EB/OL].(2020-09-30)[2023-03-30].https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2020/internet-impact-assessment-toolkit/use-case-data-localization/.
[18]许可.自由与安全:数据跨境流动的中国方案[J].环球法律评论,2021,43(1):22-37.
[19]张舵.跨境数据流动的法律规制问题研究[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2018.
[20]刘帅,乔颖,罗雄飞,等.时序数据库关键技术综述[J/OL].计算机研究与发展:1-26[2024-01-25].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1777.TP.20240108.0957.004.html.
[21]齐爱民,祝高峰.论云存储中数据安全的法律保护[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2017,23(1):101-108.
[22]徐程锦.中国跨境数据流动规制体系的CPTPP合规性研究[J].国际经贸探索,2023,39(2):69-87.
[23]廖斌,刘敏娴.数据主权冲突下的跨境电子数据取证研究[J].法学杂志,2021,42(8):147-161.
[24]唐彬彬.数据本地化法律规制的反思与完善[J].情报杂志,2022,41(5):162-168,197.
[25]时建中.数据概念的解构与数据法律制度的构建兼论数据法学的学科内涵与体系[J].中外法学,2023,35(1):23-45.
[26]张素华.数据产权结构性分置的法律实现[J].东方法学,2023(2):73-85.
[27]孔艳芳,刘建旭,赵忠秀.数据要素市场化配置研究:内涵解构、运行机理与实践路径[J].经济学家,2021(11):24-32.
[28]包晓丽.二阶序列式数据确权规则[J].清华法学,2022,16(3):60-75.
[29]邵怿.网络数据长臂管辖权——从“最低限度联系”标准到“全球共管”模式[J].法商研究,2021,38(6):73-87.
[30]刘天骄.数据主权与长臂管辖的理论分野与实践冲突[J].环球法律评论,2020,42(2):180-192.
[31]乔治·萨拜因.政治学说史:下卷[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2010.
[32]黄志雄.网络主权论——法理、政策与实践[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.
[33]吴玄.数据主权视野下个人信息跨境规则的建构[J].清华法学,2021,15(3):74-91.
[34]茶洪旺,袁航.中国大数据交易发展的问题及对策研究[J].区域经济评论,2018(4):89-95.
[35]孙晨霞,施羽暇.近年来大数据技术前沿与热点研究:基于2015—2021年VOSviewer相关文献的高频术语可视化分析[J].中国科技术语,2023,25(1):88-96.
[36]王强,霍慧彬,陈展,等.基于5G边缘计算的全场景智慧校园建设[J].中国高校科技,2019(10):94-96.
[37]马其家,刘飞虎.总体国家安全观下教育数据安全治理体系的反思与完善[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,54(1):119-128.