|
|
|
| Innovative Path of Regulating Platform Data Monopoly Under the Background of National Unified Market Construction |
| Zeng Xiong |
| School of Humanities and Social Sciences,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Creating a unified national market is the fundamental support and intrinsic requirement for building a new development pattern.Data is a new production factor,and activating the potential value of data,helps to enhance new drivers of economic development,and build new competitive advantages for the country.It is urgent to break data monopoly of platforms.But the approach of antitrust regulation has some drawbacks,including restricted application conditions and delayed enforcement effects.The approach of granting users the right to data portability has shortcomings of limited data sharing and insufficient enforcement effects.So we need a third approach to deal with the problem of data monopoly of platforms.This article suggests that we need introduce sector regulation measures to impose competitive obligations on super platforms to ensure data portability and interoperability,to make up for the shortcomings of antitrust regulation approach and data portability approach,to realize the full-chain regulation of data monopoly,including ex-ante regulation,regulation in process and afterwards.
|
|
Received: 20 June 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]刘志彪,孔令池.从分割走向整合:推进国内统一大市场建设的阻力与对策[J].中国工业经济,2021(8):20-36.
[2]王京生.以数据要素市场为引领建设高质量的全国统一大市场[J].中国行政管理,2022(9):6.
[3]LAMBRECHT A,TUCKER C E.Can big data protect a firm from competition[EB/OL].(2017-01-17)[2022-06-15].https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/can-big-data-protect-a-firm-from-competition/.
[4]陈甬军,胡德宝.大数据造成了新的市场垄断吗——国内外的理论及其对中国平台型企业反垄断的启示[J].河北学刊,2021,41(6):102-108.
[5]梅夏英,王剑.“数据垄断”命题真伪争议的理论回应[J].法学论坛,2021,36(5):94-103.
[6]程炼.数字经济时代大型互联网平台的治理[J].社会科学战线,2021(9):87-96,281.
[7]曾雄.数据垄断相关问题的反垄断法分析思路[J].竞争政策研究,2017(6):40-52.
[8]孟小峰.破解数据垄断的几种治理模式研究[J].人民论坛,2020(27):58-61.
[9]葛劲峰.新一轮反垄断浪潮的核心:构建数据充分流动的制度基础[J].探索与争鸣,2021(2):9-12.
[10]郧彦辉.数字利维坦:信息社会的新型危机[J].中共中央党校学报,2015,19(3):46-51.
[11]梁正,曾雄.“大数据杀熟”的政策应对:行为定性、监管困境与治理出路[J].科技与法律,2021(2):8-14.
[12]黄南.瓶颈与路径:全国数据要素统一大市场建设探析[J].南京社会科学,2022(10):41.
[13]杨东.论反垄断法的重构:应对数字经济的挑战[J].中国法学,2020(3):206-222.
[14]傅晓.警惕数据垄断:数据驱动型经营者集中研究[J].中国软科学,2021(1):56-67.
[15]殷继国.大数据经营者滥用市场支配地位的法律规制[J].法商研究,2020,37(4):73-87.
[16]汪庆华.数据可携带权的权利结构、法律效果与中国化[J].中国法律评论,2021(3):189-201.
[17]仲春,王政宇.竞争法视野下的数据携带权及践行构思[J].电子知识产权,2021(5):4-17.
[18]金耀.数据可携权的法律构造与本土构建[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2021,39(4):105-116.
[19]孙晋,钟原.大数据时代下数据构成必要设施的反垄断法分析[J].电子知识产权,2018(5):38-49.
[20]LUGARD P,ROACH L.The era of big data and EU/U.S.divergence for refusals to deal[J].Antitrust Magazine,2017,31(2):58-64.
[21]孙晋.数字平台的反垄断监管[J].中国社会科学,2021(5):108-111.
[22]王先林.论滥用市场支配地位行为的法律规制——《中华人民共和国反垄断法(草案)》相关部分评析[J].法商研究,2007(4):10-17.
[23]曾雄.平台“二选一”反垄断规制的挑战与应对[J].经济学家,2021(11):91-99.
[24]曾雄.论我国平台经济反垄断监管模式的转型:基于对回应性规制理论的思考[J].管理学刊,2022,35(1):1-12.
[25]李伯轩.数据携带权的反垄断效用:机理、反思与策略[J].社会科学,2021(12):105-116.
[26]丁晓东.论数据携带权的属性、影响与中国应用[J].法商研究,2020(1):75-76.
[27]GRAEF I,HUSOVEC M,PURTOVA N.Data portability and data control:lessons for an emerging concept in EU law[J].German Law Journal,2018(19):1359-1398.
[28]丁晓东.数据到底属于谁?从网络爬虫看平台数据权属与数据保护[J].华东政法大学学报,2019,22(5):69-83.
[29]SWIRE P,LAGOS Y.Why the right to data portability likely reduces consumer welfare:antitrust and privacy critique[J].Maryland Law Review,2013(72):335-380.
[30]王珊珊,闫文军.数据迁移权及其本土化路径研究——以数据竞争为视角[J].知识产权,2021(2):61-71.
[31]冯果,薛亦飒.从“权利规范模式”走向“行为控制模式”的数据信托——数据主体权利保护机制构建的另一种思路[J].法学评论,2020(3):70-82.
[32]胡继晔.数据生产要素的反垄断困境及破解对策[J].人民论坛,2021(19):88-91。
[33]刘戒骄.数据垄断形成机制与监管分析[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,23(1):71-83。
[34]高薇.平台监管的新公用事业理论[J].法学研究,2021,43(3):84-100.
[35]张晨颖.公共性视角下的互联网平台反垄断规制[J].法学研究,2021,43(4):149-170.
[36]周汉华.论平台经济反垄断与监管的二元分治[J].中国法学,2023(1):238-239. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
