生成式人工智能大模型全球治理的理论证成与初步构想

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (7559 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As an important technical branch in the field of artificial intelligence,generative artificial intelligence not only plays a positive role in driving the transformation of the digital economy and promoting the upgrading of industrial intelligence,but also causes a number of new social problems and national security risks,the proposal of global governance of generative artificial intelligence foundation models is timely.The EU is the“Third Pole”in the digital era after China and the United States,plays an important role in the construction of global digital governance rules.The global governance of the generative artificial intelligence foundation models should adhere to the concept of building a“Community of Common Destiny in Cberspace”,design reasonable technical regulation schemes at first,use the“Gatekeeper”system in the Digital Market Act to prevent and resolve the underlying monopoly risk of model operators,and treat the generative artificial intelligence foundation models as“Online Search Engine”in the Digital Service Act from the technical perspective,lay the foundation for the future construction of a more specific and refined generative artificial intelligence foundation models global governance scheme.

Key words： Generative artificial intelligence Global governance Digital hegemony Community of common destiny in cyberspace Search engine

Received: 26 June 2023

PACS:

TP181

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Yan Chi

Cite this article:

Yan Chi. The Theoretical Proof and Preliminary Conception of Global Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Foundation Models[J]. , 2024, 5(5): 140-148.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I5/140

[1]沈伟,赵尔雅.数字经济背景下的人工智能国际法规制[J].上海财经大学学报,2022,24(5):123-137.
[2]严驰.GPT4发展中的若干问题及其规制方案[J].信息安全研究,2023,9(6):510-517.
[3]宫云牧.数字时代主权概念的回归与欧盟数字治理[J].欧洲研究,2022,40(3):18-48.
[4]CNBC.Putin:Leader in artificial intelligence will rule world[EB/OL].(2017-09-04)[2024-03-31].https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/04/putin-leader-in-artificialintelligence-will-rule-world.html.
[5]Tortoise.The global AI index[EB/OL].(2023-06-29)[2024-03-31].https://www.tortoisemedia.com/intelligence/global-ai/.
[6]沈伟,赵尔雅.数字经济和数字博弈双重背景下人工智能的国际法治理[J].武大国际法评论,2023,7(4):81-105.
[7]EBBIGHAUSEN R.The US won't tolerate China as peer competitor[EB/OL].(2020-09-23)[2024-03-31].https://www.dw.com/en/chinas-rise-and-conflict-withus/a-55026173.
[8]姜志达,崔越.数字霸权与美国对华科技遏制的影响[J].和平与发展,2021(5):18-33.
[9]蓝江.生成式人工智能与人文社会科学的历史使命——从ChatGPT智能革命谈起[J].思想理论教育,2023(4):12-18.
[10]唐新华.技术政治时代的权力与战略[J].国际政治科学,2021,6(2):59-89.
[11]鲁传颖.坚持推动构建网络空间命运共同体[N].光明日报,2023-07-28(11).
[12]周辉,金僖艾.英国人工智能监管实践、创新与借鉴[J].数字法治,2023(5):194-206.
[13]马长山.人工智能的社会风险及其法律规制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018(6):47-55.
[14]蒲清平,向往.生成式人工智能——ChatGPT的变革影响、风险挑战及应对策略[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2023,29(3):102-114.
[15]丁雅栀.IMF:AI将影响全球四成就业[N].环球时报,2024-01-16(11).
[16]郭小东.生成式人工智能的风险及其包容性法律治理[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,25(6):93-105.
[17]郭春镇.生成式AI的融贯性法律治理——以生成式预训练模型(GPT)为例[J].现代法学,2023,45(3):88-107.
[18]马克思恩格斯选集[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[19]严驰.生成式人工智能时代人工智能法的立法思考[J].信息安全研究,2024,10(2):103-108.
[20]程乐.生成式人工智能治理的态势、挑战与展望[J].人民论坛,2024(2):76-81.
[21]冯子轩.生成式人工智能应用的伦理立场与治理之道:以ChatGPT为例[J].华东政法大学学报,2024,27(1):61-71.
[22]袁曾.生成式人工智能治理的法律回应[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2024,41(1):28-39.
[23]马爱芳,胡泳.人工智能的国际治理:理论框架、现实困境与模式探究[J].新闻与写作,2024(1):69-80.
[24]陈鹏.人工智能时代的全球治理——基于构建人类命运共同体的视角[J].观察与思考,2021(9):74-83.
[25]董汀,黄智尧.人工智能国际治理与“不确定性”[J].信息安全与通信保密,2023(8):10-22.
[26]周慎,朱旭峰,梁正.全球可持续发展视域下的人工智能国际治理[J].中国科技论坛,2022(9):163-169.
[27]钟建丽,龚茜.人工智能的共同治理应符合人类共同价值[N].科技日报,2023-10-20(6).
[28]BRADFORD A.Digital empires:the global battle to regulate technology[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2023.
[29]方兴东,钟祥铭,谢永琪.“布鲁塞尔效应”与中国数字治理的制度创新——中美欧竞合博弈的建构主义解读[J].传媒观察,2024(3):33-44.
[30]A free and fair digital economy protecting privacy,empowering Indians[EB/OL].(2018-06-27)[2024-03-31].https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Data_Protection_Committee_Report.pdf.
[31]李肆.中欧是伙伴不是对手:共识大于分歧,合作多于竞争[J].中国对外贸易,2024(1):20-21.
[32]刘晋.欧盟“印太战略”的调整与中欧关系[J].国际论坛,2024,26(2):33-47.
[33]WANG L,LI Y.The negotiation of EU-China comprehensive agreement on investment and its potential impact in the post-pandemic Era[J].Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies,2020,18(2):365-372.
[34]姜锋.中欧关系将在发展中调整合作共赢机会远大于竞争[N].解放日报,2024-01-07(4).
[35]张蕴洁,冯莉媛,李铮,等.中美欧国际数字治理格局比较研究及建议[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(10):1386-1399.
[36]丁纯.欧盟数字化转型的特征与启示[J].人民论坛,2021(25):106-109.
[37]赵海乐.欧盟数字市场治理规则“布鲁塞尔效应”的限度与我国因应[J].德国研究,2023,38(6):78-95.
[38]金晶.欧盟的规则,全球的标准?数据跨境流动监管的“逐顶竞争”[J].中外法学,2023,35(1):46-65.
[39]严驰.生成式AI大模型的全球治理方案:何以可能与何以可为[J].科技与法律(中英文),2024(1):91-99.
[40]苗争鸣,陈嘉澍,聂正楠,等.人工智能、数字权力与大国博弈[J].信息安全与通信保密,2023(8):2-9.
[41]刘泽刚.论算法认知偏差对人工智能法律规制的负面影响及其矫正[J].政治与法律,2022(11):50-65.
[42]王晓丽,严驰.数字时代NFT著作权若干问题思考[J].南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(5):53-65.
[43]徐德顺,张宇嫣.欧盟“数字双法”对数字经济的影响研究[J].国际贸易,2024(1):29-39.
[44]唐要家.数字经济创新优先的反垄断政策[J].探索与争鸣,2021(2):27-29.
[45]韩天竹,张瑜.欧盟《数字市场法》新范式——突破抑或坎阱[J].国际经济法学刊,2023(4):67-79.
[46]方彬楠,赵天舒.月活10亿的OpenAI不打算上市[N].北京商报,2023-06-08(8).
[47]FREDERIC J.Competition law and digital ecosystems:learning to walk before we run[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2021,30(5):1143-1167.
[48]夏菡.国际法视野下欧盟数据治理立法发展及对中国的启示[J].武大国际法评论,2023,7(4):106-118.
[49]严驰,王晓丽.《数字市场法》“守门人”制度解析与展望[J].信息通信技术与政策,2023,49(3):54-60.
[50]陈珍妮.欧盟《数字服务法案》探析及对我国的启示[J].知识产权,2022(6):110-126.
[51]展鹏贺,罗小坤.互联网平台分级监管的法理逻辑与路径完善:基于欧盟《数字服务法》的比较观察[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2023,37(3):72-79.
[52]王晓丽,严驰.IPFS未来规制进路探寻:基于相关裁判文书的分析[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2023,25(5):96-104.