|
|
|
| Coupling Mechanism and Empirical Analysis of National High-Tech Zones and High-Tech Industries |
| Sun Qin1, Liu Jie Jiao2,3 |
1. School of Economics,Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China;
2. Business School,Jiangxi Institute of Fashion Technology,Nanchang 330201,China;
3. Institute of Industrial Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100006,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract There are differences in the internal composition of national high-tech zones and high-tech industries,but the two support and influence each other,and there is a strong internal logical correlation.Under the guidance of high-quality development strategies,it is of great significance to explore the internal relationship and coupling degree between national high-tech zones and high-tech industries.Starting from the coupling mechanism between national high-tech zones and high-tech industries,this paper analyzes the driving mechanism of national high-tech zones for the development of high-tech industries,and the feedback mechanism of high-tech industries for the high-quality development of national high-tech zones.Then,it constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system for national high-tech zones and high-tech industries,uses entropy method to assign weights,and calculates the coupling degree and coupling coordination scheduling of the two,and analyzes its characteristics from different perspectives.The empirical results indicate the followings.①the coupling coordination degree of the two subsystems is increasing in the overall trend of the country,but the level of coupling coordination scheduling varies in different time intervals.From 2009 to 2011,the coupling coordination level was between barely and low coupling levels,reaching an intermediate coupling level in 2012,and a high coupling type since 2018.②From an annual perspective,the type of coupling coordination degree from 2009 to 2010 was barely coordinated,from 2012 to 2013 it was low coordinated,from 2014 to 2019 it was moderate coordinated,and only reached a high level of coordination in 2020.③From the regional perspective,the coupling coordination values of the eastern,central,and western regions have been higher in recent years than those of the northeastern region,but the overall performance of each region shows an upward trend in fluctuations.
|
|
Received: 06 April 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]薛鹏飞,李国景,罗其友,等.中国农业科技资源水平区域差异及空间结构研究[J].农业技术经济,2021(5):108-120.
[2]刘耀彬,李仁东,宋学锋.中国城市化与生态环境耦合度分析[J].自然资源学报,2005(1):105-112.
[3]孟凡蓉,陈子韬,袁梦.科技创新、科技资源与经济增长的耦合研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(9):63-74.
[4]李强,韩伯棠.我国高新区产业集聚测度体系研究[J].中国管理科学,2007,72(4):130-137.
[5]邵汉华,周磊.国家高新区与城市经济效率的时空耦合协调研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(14):36-42.
[6]李杰.经济内循环视域下高技术产业与地区经济协调发展分析[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,42(11):129-140.
[7]王鹏,吴思霖,李彦.国家高新区的设立能否推动城市产业结构优化升级:基于PSM-DID方法的实证分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2019,204(4):17-29.
[8]李启航,黄璐,张少辉.国家高新区设立能够提升城市全要素生产率吗:基于261个地级市TFP分解数据的路径分析[J].南方经济,2021,378(3):54-72.
[9]张佩,王姣娥,孙勇,等.中国省域创新基础设施与创新产出水平的耦合协调发展及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2022,42(9):11-21.
[10]张羽飞,原长弘,王涛,等.产学研深度融合演化路径分析:基于浙江清华长三角研究院的纵向案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020,291(7):87-98.
[11]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999(2):76-82.
[12]熊曦,魏晓.国家自主创新示范区的创新能力评价——以我国10个国家自主创新示范区为例[J].经济地理,2016,36(1):33-38.
[13]牟仁艳,解佳龙,胡树华.基于“三力模型”的国家高新区发展非均衡评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(10):104-109.
[14]胡树华,解佳龙,王松,等.基于多级模糊综合评价法的国家高新区竞争力研究[J].软科学,2011,25(5):53-56.
[15]解佳龙,胡树华.国家自主创新示范区甄选体系设计与应用[J].中国软科学,2013(8):67-79.
[16]朱斌,王渝.我国高新区产业集群持续创新能力研究[J].科学学研究,2004(5):529-537.
[17]梁向东,阳柳.国家自主创新示范区创新驱动效率测度及政策评价[J].中国软科学,2021(7):131-142.
[18]王洪庆,侯毅.中国高技术产业技术创新能力评价研究[J].中国科技论坛,2017,251(3):58-63.
[19]刘娜娜,王效俐,韩海彬.高校科技创新与高技术产业创新耦合协调发展的时空特征及驱动机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):59-70.
[20]王敏,辜胜阻.中国高技术产业技术创新能力的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛,2015(3):67-73.
[21]刘和东,刘繁繁.要素集聚提升高新技术产业绩效的黑箱解构:基于经济高质量发展的门槛效应分析[J].科学学研究,2021,39(11):1960-1969.
[22]王婷,王海天.高技术产业集聚度与生态环境耦合关系演化研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(15):44-53.
[23]曾昭宁,樊雯.高技术产业技术创新能力评价指标体系研究[J].西安石油大学学报(社会科学版),2014,23(1):6-10.
[24]孙琴,刘戒骄.国家高新区与高新技术产业耦合协调发展研究[J/OL].科学学研究:1-23[2024-03-29].https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230830.002. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
