|
|
|
| Security Management Strategy and Typical Practice of International Scientific Data Sharing Platform |
| Zhang Guilan1, Wang Jian2, Pan Yuntao1, Yang Daiqing1 |
1. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China,Beijing 100038,China;
2. Institute of Agricultural Information,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100083,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Under the background of the digital wave and open science,the size and value of scientific data will continue to grow And data security supervision will also continue to improve.These factors objectively determine the importance and urgency of scientific data security work.This paper tried to improve scientific data security management ability effectively.We took the scientific data sharing ecosystem as the basic starting point.And we also reviewed the relevant experience and typical practices of representative scientific data centers at home and abroad,such as ICPSR,UKDA and National Earth System Science Data Center.By combing relevant experience and typical practices of representative scientific data centers at home and abroad,such as ICPSR,UKDA and National Earth System Science Data Center,this paper outlined the overall appearance of scientific data security governance,focused on describing the details of data security management strategy of scientific data center,summarized the measures of scientific data security management.According to the level of security governance,scientific data sharing platform was divided into three types named as deep governance,medium governance and shallow governance.By comparing the security management strategies of scientific data centers at home and abroad,it provided an experience for the security management of scientific data in China.
|
|
Received: 01 August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]宋筱璇,王延飞,钟灿涛.国内外科研数据安全管理政策比较研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(11):10-16.
[2]罗娇,刘细文.知识产权视角下科学数据安全管理的策略选择[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(12):38-46.
[3]李善青,郑彦宁,邢晓昭,等.科学数据共享的安全管理问题研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2019,51(3):11-17.
[4]盛小平,郭道胜.科学数据开放共享中的数据安全治理研究[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(22):25-36.
[5]陈越,都平平,周琼.美国高校科学数据使用协议应用情况调查与启示[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(24):135-142.
[6]赵培云.大数据与图书馆数据安全共享[J].图书馆学研究,2014(9):39-41.
[7]宋理国.基于大数据视角对医院信息化和网络数据安全建设的分析[J].网络安全技术与应用,2016(6):67,69.
[8]李瑞轩,董新华,辜希武,等.移动云服务的数据安全与隐私保护综述[J].通信学报,2013,34(12):158-166.
[9]LUIS E B V.A data security framework for cloud computing services[J].Computer systems science and engineering,2021,37(2):203-218.
[10]苗争鸣,尹西明,许展玮,等.颠覆性技术异化及其治理研究——以“深度伪造”技术的典型化事实为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(12):83-98.
[11]李宜展,刘细文,李泽霞,等.科学数据安全边界概念模型研究:基于利益相关者视角[J].中国科学基金,2022,36(2):339-347.
[12]Information Security Oversight Office.The president executive order 13526 classified national security information[R/OL].(2009-12-29)/[2022-06-21].https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html.
[13]UK Government.Government security classifications[R/OL].(2018-05-21)/[2022-06-21].https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-security-classifications.
[14]杨晶,康琪,李哲.推动科学数据开放共享的思考及启示[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2019,34(10):37-43.
[15]Limited data set policy[EB/OL].[2021-08-22].https://universitypolicies.columbia.edu/content/limited-data-set-policy.
[16]Research inventory system[EB/OL].[2021-08-22].https://researchservices.upenn.edu/systems/research-inventory-system/.
[17]The European Parliament and of the Council.Regulation(EU)2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data,and repealing Directive 95/46/EC[R/OL].(2018-05-23)/[2022-06-24].https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679.
[18]The researcher passport:improving data access and confidentiality protection,global,2017-2018.Inter-university consortium for political and social research[R/OL].[2019-10-29].https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37454.
[19]Research data handling and security guide for users[R/OL].(2021-06-10)/[2022-08-02]https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/app/uploads/cd171-researchdatahandling.pdf. |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 5 
