科技伦理治理:核心要义、面临困局及实现机制

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (5)

Download: PDF (1196 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Ethics of science and technology is the value concept and code of conduct to be followed in the process of carrying out science and technology activities,and ethical governance of science and technology is an important part of modern social governance and an important guarantee for building China into a world power in science and technology.Ethical governance of science and technology is embedded in ethical co-governance and is an interactive consultation process involving multiple subjects.With the development of emerging technologies,the importance of ethical governance of science and technology in China has been increasing,but it still faces the problem that it is difficult to effectively implement relevant policies.Based on the five elements of governance including governance objectives,governance subjects,governance objects,governance means and governance modes,the paper analyzes the dilemma faced by ethical governance of science and technology in China,and constructs the“one body,one foundation and three wings”ethical governance of science and technology mechanism,so as to provide references for promoting the top-level design of ethical governance of science and technology in China and promoting the healthy and orderly development of science and technology innovation.

Key words： Ethical governance of science and technology Five elements of governance Science and technology layout Scientific research project

Received: 14 November 2023

PACS:

G311

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Ma Wanning
	Chen Yaping
	Han Fengqin

Cite this article:

Ma Wanning,Chen Yaping,Han Fengqin. Ethical Governance of Science and Technology: Core Meaning,Dilemma and Implementation Mechanism[J]. , 2024, 5(4): 1-11.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I4/1

[1]Commission on Global Governance.Our global neighbourhood:the report of the commission on global governance[R].New York:Oxford University Press,1995.
[2]樊天,樊春良.负责任研究与创新框架之下的脑科学伦理治理——对欧盟脑科学计划(HBP)的案例研究[J].科学学研究,2023,41(6):961-970.
[3]张文霞,卢阳旭,何光喜.关于科技伦理治理的几点认识[J].科技中国,2022(8):88-90.
[4]薛桂波,赵一秀.基于“负责任创新”的欧盟科技政策转型及启示[J].中国科技论坛,2017(4):172-177.
[5]王学昭,甘泉,王燕鹏,等.颠覆性技术创新的前瞻性治理[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(5):620-628.
[6]李正风,刘诗谣.建构科技伦理治理共同体的信任关系[J].科学与社会,2021,11(4):18-32.
[7]赵世军,董晓辉,旷毓君.系统论视域下我国科技安全治理的机理和路径研究[J].系统科学学报,2023,31(4):73-78.
[8]计海庆.论科技伦理的治理创新[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,54(5):101-110,190.
[9]解学芳,高嘉琪.“智能+”时代AI文化科技伦理反思:创新边界与伦理准则[J].自然辩证法研究,2022,38(7):74-81.
[10]中华人民共和国公安部.公安部新闻发布会通报部署全国公安机关开展“净网2021”专项行动的工作举措和取得的成效等情况[EB/OL].(2022-01-14)[2023-10-11].https://www.mps.gov.cn/n2253534/n2253535/c8329772/content.html.
[11]中华人民共和国公安部.公安机关“净网2022”专项行动成效显著[EB/OL].(2023-01-09)[2023-10-11].https://app.mps.gov.cn/gdnps/pc/content.jsp?id=9192033.
[12]邓大胜.科技工作者状况调查年度报告(2020年)[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,2021.
[13]于雪,凌昀,李伦.新兴科技伦理治理的问题及其对策[J].科学与社会,2021,11(4):51-65.
[14]宋应登,霍竹,邓益志.中国科技伦理治理的问题挑战及对策建议[J/OL].科学学研究,2023(9):1-18[2023-10-04].https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230927.001.
[15]刘益东.科技重大风险与人类安全危机:前所未有的双重挑战及其治理对策[J].工程研究——跨学科视野中的工程,2020,12(4):321-336.
[16]何光喜,张新庆,赵延东,等.我国医学科研人员对科研伦理的认知和态度:基于一项全国性抽样调查结果[J].中国医学伦理学,2022,35(1):26-32.
[17]中国经济时报.构建我国科技伦理治理体系正当其时[EB/OL].(2022-03-23).https://www.sohu.com/a/531996938_115495.
[18]丁明磊.高水平科技伦理治理:现实意义与总体思路[J].国家治理,2022(7):38-42.
[19]王国豫,梅宏.构建数字化世界的伦理秩序[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(11):1278-1287.
[20]孙福海,陈思宇,黄甫全,等.道德人工智能:基础、原则与设计[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2021,20(1):38-46.
[21]吴家睿.基于“平衡原则”的科技伦理治理:简论《关于加强科技伦理治理的意见》[J].生命科学,2022,34(5):485-488.
[22]黎四奇.数据科技伦理法律化问题探究[J].中国法学,2022(4):114-134.
[23]石佳友,刘忠炫.科技伦理治理的法治化路径:以基因编辑技术的规制为例[J].学海,2022(5):183-193.
[24]中国教育新闻网.高校科技伦理教育专项工作启动会在清华大学召开[EB/OL].(2022-03-24)[2023-04-30].http://www.jyb.cn/rmtzcg/xwy/wzxw/202203/t20220324_686311.html.