中国企业科技向善水平评价体系构建与实证研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (8634 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a business guideline to guide enterprises to co-exist with society and enhance users' value and social welfare,corporate science and technology for social good has received wide attention from theoretical and practical circles.However,extant studies have not yet systematically established a comprehensive index system to evaluate the level of corporate science and technology for social good in China.The study establishes an evaluation system on the basis of three dimensions of corporate concept and culture for social good,corporate practice for social good,and corporate governance system for social good,and uses the entropy method to measure the level of corporate science and technology for social good in China.The results show that the overall trend of the index of corporate science and technology for social good in China is on the rise.Its evolution can be divided into the initial budding stage,the consensus formation stage and the rapid development stage,which is mainly due to the synergistic effect of the aforementioned three dimensions.Moreover,the index of corporate science and technology for social good in China shows enterprise heterogeneity and industry heterogeneity,which is potentially related to the variability of resource endowment among enterprises and the different intensity of environmental,social and governance management among industries.

Key words： Corporate science and technology for social good Evaluation system Validity testing Entropy method

Received: 18 April 2023

PACS:

F272.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Ruan Rongbin
	Zhu Zuping
	Chen Wan

Cite this article:

Ruan Rongbin,Zhu Zuping,Chen Wan. Establishment and Measurement of the Evaluation System of the Level of Corporate Science and Technology for Social Good in China[J]. , 2024, 5(3): 120-131.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I3/120

[1]司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[2]张颖熙,夏杰长.科技向善赋能共同富裕:机理、模式与路径[J].河北学刊,2022,42(3):115-122.
[3]POWELL A B,USTEK-SPILDA F,LEHUED S,et al.Addressing ethical gaps in‘technology for good’:foregrounding care and capabilities[J].Big data & society,2022,9(2):1-12.
[4]王长征,徐龙超,王盟迪.科技向善国外研究回顾与展望[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40(9):151-160.
[5]杨淼,雷家骕.科技向善:基于竞争战略导向的企业创新行为研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(8):1-8.
[6]MAGALHÃES J C,COULDRY N.Giving by taking away:big tech,data colonialism,and the reconfiguration of social good[J].International journal of communication,2021(15):343-362.
[7]阮荣彬,陈莞.企业科技向善:内涵、量表开发与检验[J].科学学研究,2023,41(3):511-520.
[8]张江.大科技时代,“向善”是基本趋势[EB/OL].(2019-11-06)[2023-03-19].https://www.tisi.org/14928.
[9]彭凯平.当下就是进行社会价值创新的最好时间[EB/OL].(2023-02-17)[2023-03-19].https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20230217A06PU600.
[10]邱泽奇.数字时代,科技向善为什么更重要[EB/OL].(2019-10-23)[2023-03-19].https://www.tisi.org/11437.
[11]费俊.科技向善需要人文主义支撑[EB/OL].(2019-10-25)[2023-03-19].https://www.tisi.org/11469.
[12]HACHEM W E.Interactions between manufacturers' R&D investment and government regulations:the case of transition to alternative fuel vehicles[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2023,70(3):1147-1161.
[13]LI G,WU H,ZHENG H.Technology investment strategy for a competitive manufacturer in the presence of technology spillover[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2023,70(3):1162-1173.
[14]SCHILLING L,SEURING S.The role of information and communication technology in managing supply chains in base-of-the-pyramid markets[J].IEEE transactions on engineering management,2023,70(3):1186-1198.
[15]廖卉.未来工作场景与创新的情感动力[EB/OL].(2020-12-04)[2023-03-19].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1685077032351229417&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[16]肖红军.企业社会责任议题管理:理论构建与实践探索[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2017.
[17]吴武林,周小亮.中国包容性绿色增长绩效评价体系的构建及应用[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(9):183-194.
[18]陈国宏,康艺苹,李美娟.区域科技创新能力动态评价:基于改进的“纵横向”拉开档次评价法[J].技术经济,2015,34(10):17-23.
[19]陈晓萍.互联网公司管理大变革[EB/OL].(2020-11-05)[2023-03-19].https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20201105A0DOF100.
[20]翟志勇.面向可持续发展的科技伦理:从“不作恶”到“向善”[J].可持续发展经济导刊,2022(Z1):109-111.
[21]毛良虎,李焕焕,杨叶凡,等.基于熵值法的企业家精神评价体系构建[J].统计与决策,2020,36(6):156-160.
[22]郭凯天.科技向善应是企业的内在驱动力[EB/OL].(2023-01-09)[2023-03-19].https://ssv.tencent.com/detail/dynamic/607.
[23]李欣融,毛义君,雷家骕.企业科技向善:研究述评与展望[J].中国科技论坛,2021(7):115-124.
[24]蒋丽芹,郑洁,张慧芹.非沉淀冗余、科技向善与企业创新绩效:数字赋能调节作用[J].科技管理研究,2023,43(23):176-184.
[25]雷家骕.疫灾时期科技向善的创新[J].网信军民融合,2020(3):29-32.
[26]王志刚.完善科技伦理治理体系保障科技创新健康发展[J].求是,2022(20):43-47.