基于创新质量的关键核心技术攻关组态路径研究——以集成电路为例

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1229 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The innovation quality determines the success or failure of key core technology research,and is the key to solving the neck problem and promoting high-quality development.This paper defines the innovation quality of key core technology from the perspective of quality and constructs an index system.Taking integrated circuits as an example,it measures the innovation quality of key core technology,and uses fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)to explore the condition configuration and multiple paths of innovation quality of key core technology to achieve key core technology research.The results show that the single condition of innovation quality has a weak effect on the key core technology research,and the combination of different condition variables has a strong influence on the key core technology research.There are two configuration paths to achieve key core technology research,namely,result quality-oriented conditional configuration and applicability-result quality collaborative conditional configuration.The study found that the quality of results is the basis for achieving key core technology research,and the quality of applicability is the key.In conclusion,recommendations are proposed for enhancing key core technology research in China,based on the findings of the study.

Key words： Key core technology Innovation quality Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Received: 03 April 2023

PACS:

F204

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Xu Xueguo
	Liu Fengmei
	Zhou Shiyu

Cite this article:

Xu Xueguo,Liu Fengmei,Zhou Shiyu. Research on Configuration Path of the Key Core Technology Research Based on Innovation Quality ——A Case Study of Integrated Circuit[J]. , 2024, 5(2): 49-60.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I2/49

[1]CROSBY P B.Quality is free[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1979.
[2]JURAN J M.Juran's quality control handbook[M].New York:McGraw-Hill Press,1979.
[3]International Organization for Standardization.Quality management systems——fundamentals and vocabular:ISO 9000-2015[S].Geneva:ISO,2015.
[4]HANER U E.Innovation quality:a conceptual framework[J].International journal of production economics,2002,80 (1):31-37.
[5]杨幽红.创新质量理论框架:概念、内涵和特点[J].科研管理,2013,34 (S1):320-325.
[6]张樨樨,曹正旭,徐士元.创新质量对高技术产业绿色创新效率影响的异质性:基于产业集聚的门槛效应[J].科技管理研究,2021,41 (18):10-17.
[7]周文泳,张贇.国家高新区产业集群创新质量评价[J].科技与经济,2021,34 (3):21-25.
[8]CANNICE V,CHEN R,DANIELS D.Managing international technology transfer risk:alternatives and complements to ownership structure[J].Management international review,2004,44 (1):129-152.
[9]余维新,熊文明.关键核心技术军民融合协同创新机理及协同机制研究:基于创新链视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2020 (12):34-39.
[10]胡旭博,原长弘.关键核心技术:概念、特征与突破因素[J].科学学研究,2022,40 (1):4-11.
[11]徐霞,吴福象,王兵.基于国际专利分类的关键核心技术识别研究[J].情报杂志,2022,41 (10):74-81.
[12]DANIEL F S.Famous fables of economics:myths of market failures[M].New Jersey:Wiley-Blackwell,2002.
[13]李维安,孟乾坤.高技术产业技术锁定及其升级路径:基于多元治理的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42 (6):114-140.
[14]张杰,吴书凤. “十四五”时期中国关键核心技术创新的障碍与突破路径分析[J].人文杂志,2021 (1):9-19.
[15]左晶晶,谢晋宇.社会网络结构与创业绩效:基于270名科技型大学生创业者的问卷调查[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25 (3):64-73.
[16]朴英爱,于鸿.对外直接投资逆向技术溢出对中国技术创新能力的影响:基于门槛效应的实证研究[J].山西大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2022,45 (4):135-145.
[17]孙冰,刘晨,田胜男.社会网络视角下联盟成员合作关系对技术标准形成的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38 (4):21-27.
[18]徐梦周,胡青,吕铁.信息消费能促进区域创新效率提升吗:基于省域面板数据的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2022 (8):184-192.
[19]唐皇凤,徐植.新型举国体制的科学内涵、独特优势与运行机制优化[J].新疆师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2023,44 (1):83-93.
[20]王宏起,杨仲基,安宁.创新双螺旋视角下区域战略性新兴产业培育模式及应用研究[J].中国科技论坛,2014 (8):55-59,73.
[21]王树斌,杨德林,王超发,等.外部技术扩散模式下的高新技术企业成长研究[J].科学学研究,2021,39 (9):1662-1670.
[22]FEIGENBAUM A V.Total quality control[M].New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company,1983.
[23]DEMING W A.戴明论质量管理[M].钟汉清,戴永久,译.海口:海南出版社,2003.
[24]陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦. “十四五”时期 “卡脖子”技术的破解:识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J].改革,2020 (12):5-15.
[25]方远平,谢蔓.创新要素的空间分布及其对区域创新产出的影响:基于中国省域的ESDA-GWR分析[J].经济地理,2012,32 (9):8-14.
[26]PELLEGRINO G,PIVA M,VIVARELLI M.Young firms and innovation:a microeconometric analysis[J].Structural change and economic dynamics,2012,23 (4),329-340.
[27]赵玉林,胡燕.高技术产业创新绩效的累积效应:基于阶段性和滞后期的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (10):101-110.
[28]张添,余伯阳.我国战略性新兴产业创新系统效率评价研究:以医疗器械产业为例[J].江苏社会科学,2019 (3):76-85.
[29]杨骞,刘鑫鹏,孙淑惠.中国科技创新效率的区域差异及其成因识别:基于重大国家区域发展战略[J].科学学研究,2022,40 (5):927-937,949.
[30]刘建丽.百年来中国共产党领导科技攻关的组织模式演化及其制度逻辑[J].经济与管理研究,2021,42 (10):3-16.
[31]余晓,祝鑫梅,宋明顺.标准与科技的 “乘数效应”是否体现:政策协同的视角[J].中国软科学,2021 (5):1-11.
[32]谢婼青.科技创新策源能力:影响因素与提升路径[J].上海经济研究,2023 (2):64-77.
[33]陈晓东,杨晓霞.数字化转型是否提升了产业链自主可控能力[J].经济管理,2022,44 (8):23-39.
[34]吴迪,徐政.我国制造业新旧动能顺畅转换的实现路径[J].科学管理研究,2021,39(4):98-104.
[35]张杰,陈容.产业链视角下中国关键核心技术创新的突破路径与对策[J].南通大学学报 (社会科学版),2022,38 (2):116-126.
[36]毛毅翀,吴福象,竺李乐.技术创新提质增量的双重监管困境及破解路径[J].西南民族大学学报 (人文社会科学版),2022,43 (8):130-140.
[37]张亚明,宋雯婕,武晓涵,等.科技创新驱动产业升级的多重并发因果关系与多元路径[J].科研管理,2021,42 (12):19-28.
[38]邓峰,王一飞.技术锁定对创新绩效的影响:创新模式的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39 (14):1-11.
[39]RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry:fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2009.
[40]GRECKHAMER T.CEO compensation in relation to worker compensation across countries:the configurational impact of country‐level institutions[J].Strategic management journal,2016,37 (4),793-815.
[41]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal,2011,54 (2),393-420.
[42]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167.
[43]VERWEIJ S,NOY C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[J].International journal of social research methodology,2013,16 (2),165-169.
[44]马宗国,蒋依晓.国家自主创新示范区产业转型升级的影响因素与路径选择:基于fsQCA方法的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2023,40 (2):50-59.