面向负责任研究的科研数据信用风险敏捷治理体系研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (1319 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Scientific research data is the basis of scientific research,it runs through the whole process of scientific research discovery,and is an important process and stage data in the scientific research life cycle.The frequent occurrence of dishonest scientific research behaviors such as data fraud and data tampering is thought-provoking.How to effectively deal with scientific research dishonesty is an important issue that cannot be ignored.Therefore,this research focuses on the problem of dishonesty of scientific research data,faces the idea of responsible conduct of research,and based on the theory of agile governance,integrates legal system,digital technology and integrity ethics,so as proposing feasible ideas for constructing an agile governance system for credit risk in scientific research data,and build an agile governance mechanism based on the path of“D.I.Man”.This system helps researchers to strengthen their sense of responsibility,consciously assume role responsibility,and on this basis,it will play the soft constraint and normative role of data credit culture and policies in dishonest behavior in scientific research data.

Key words： Data credit Agile governance Responsible conduct of research(RCR)

Received: 26 December 2022

PACS:

G203

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Jin
	Zou Chunlong
	Ma Haiqun

Cite this article:

Wang Jin,Zou Chunlong,Ma Haiqun. Research on Data Credit Risk Agile Governance System of Scientific Research for Responsible Conduct of Research[J]. , 2024, 5(1): 7-15.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2024/V5/I1/7

[1]闫晴.区块链赋能科研诚信管理的理论证成与制度创新[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(23):113-120.
[2]胡剑.美国负责任研究行为(RCR)教育的演进、特点及启示[J].外国教育研究,2012,39(2):120-128.
[3]武学超.科研再现性危机:行为表现、内生逻辑及治理路径[J].科学学研究,2022,40(8):1361-1367.
[4]何宏莲,吕志娟,刘尊梅.高校科研诚信的“他律”与“自律”机制研究[J].东北农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,12(6):87-91.
[5]刘香菊,刘在洲.大学科研育人的价值意蕴与作用机理[J].高等教育研究,2020,41(8):73-81.
[6]CARLOS C,BRETT H,GOLDMAN G T,et al.Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes[J].Conservation biology the journal of the society for conservation biology,2017,31(5):967-975.
[7]丁魁礼,张碧晖,陈丰任.科研不端行为的惩罚强度研究[J].科学学研究,2021,39(8):1345-1353.
[8]翟学伟.诚信、信任与信用:概念的澄清与历史的演进[J].江海学刊,2011(5):107-114,239.
[9]熊新正,胡恩华,修立军,等.科研诚信行为影响因素研究综述[J].科学管理研究,2012,30(3):39-42.
[10]张维迎.信息、信任与法律[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2006.
[11]张鸿翔.建立科研管理过程中的信用制度[J].中国科学院院刊,2004(3):209-211.
[12]周姝含,陈喜乐.基于治理的“负责任创新”柔性模式研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2022,44(8):82-89.
[13]梅亮,陈劲.责任式创新:源起、归因解析与理论框架[J].管理世界,2015(8):39-57.
[14]HOEVEN J,JACOB K,NIELSEN L,et al.Options for strenghtening responsible research and innovation report of the expert group on the state of art in Europe on responsible research and innovation[M].Luxembourg:Publications Office of the European Union,2013.
[15]STILGOE J,OWEN R,MACNAGTEN P.Developing a framework for responsible innovation[J].Research policy,2013,42(9):1568-1580.
[16]KOOPS B J,OOSTERLAKEN I,ROMIJN H,et al.Responsible innovation 2:concepts,approaches,and applications[M].Switzerland:Springer Cham,2015.
[17]SPRUIT S L,HOOPLE G D,ROLFE D A.Just a cog in the machine? The individual responsibility of researchers in nanotechnology is a duty to collectivize[J].Science and engineering ethics,2016,22(3):871-887.
[18]DE SAILLE S.Innovating innovation:RRI as a guiding principle in the era[J].Journal of responsible innovation,2015,2(2):152-168.
[19]OWEN R,BESSANT J,HEINTZ M.Responsible innovation:managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society[M].NYC:John Wiley ＆ Sons,2013.
[20]廖苗,高璐,胡明艳,等.从“负责任创新”到“开放科学”——雷内·冯·尚伯格访谈录[J].长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,35(3):14-27.
[21]王丹丹,吴思洁.英国科研数据开放共享的关键问题思考[J].情报杂志,2020,39(9):163-167,182.
[22]ELMI N,BROEKAERT K,LARSEN A M E,et al.Agile governance reimagining policy-making in the fourth industrial revolution[M].Switzerland:World Economic Forum,2018.
[23]QUMER A.Defining an integrated agile governance for large agile software development environments[J].Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming,2007(6):157-160.
[24]李汉卿,孟子龙.数字政府建设何以实现敏捷治理:多维度展开及其不确定性克服[J].求实,2022(5):26-37,110.
[25]COSTA C P,LUNA A J H D O,MOURA H P D,et al.Agile governance in information and communication technologies:Shifting paradigms[J].Journal of information systems and technology management,2010,7(2):311-334.
[26]LAPPI T,AALTONEN K.Project governance in public sector agile software projects[J].International journal of managing projects in business,2017(2):263-294.
[27]曾德麟,欧阳桃花,胡京波,等.IT能力与组织管控促进复杂产品研发敏捷性研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36(7):1264-1273.
[28]马伊里.集中控制与非集中控制:政府再造的一种制度安排[J].探索与争鸣,2005(5):17-19.
[29]孔繁斌.行政管理理性化的追求与困境——马克斯·韦伯的官僚制理论分析[J].南京大学学报:哲学·人文科学版,1998(1):177-182.
[30]WRIGHT P D,LIBERATORE M J,NYDICK R L.A survey of operations research models and applications in homeland security[J].Interfaces,2006,36(6):514-529.
[31]范玉吉,张潇.数据安全治理的模式变迁、选择与进路[J].电子政务,2022(4):114-124.
[32]姜李丹,薛澜.我国新一代人工智能治理的时代挑战与范式变革[J].公共管理学报,2022,19(2):1-11.
[33]周超,毛胜根.社会治理工具的分类与型构:基于社会治理靶向和行动逻辑的分析[J].社会科学,2020(10):43-52.
[34]乔利利,邓峰,赵星.基于数智人的元宇宙敏捷治理路径构建及应用[J].图书馆论坛,2022,42(7):33-42.