|
|
|
| Does Overseas Experience Mean Higher Academic Performance？——Based on PIs of the National Natural Science Foundation of China |
| Cai Xiaojing1, Lyu Xiaozan2, Zhou Ping3 |
1. Research Center for Government Governance and Public Policy,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 25127,China;
2. School of Law,Hangzhou City University,Hangzhou 310001,China;
3. School of Public Administration,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper analyzes the relationship between researchers' overseas experience and the academic output,citation impact,and the degree of international cooperation.A total of 923 doctoral applicants funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China during 2011—2014 were selected,and regression analysis and other methods were used.Results reveal that overseas experience exerts a notable influence on citation impact and international cooperation,although it does not significantly impact on academic output in terms of publication volume.Researchers holding overseas doctoral degrees exhibit a greater long-term academic influence and engage in more extensive international cooperation compared to their counterparts with local doctoral degrees.Notably,the degree of international cooperation among those with overseas degrees tends to converge with that of researchers holding local doctoral degrees over time,reflecting a process of gradual “localization”.Among individuals with local doctoral degrees,those with prior overseas work experience demonstrate a higher level of academic influence than those with only overseas exchange experience.Additionally,their degree of international cooperation significantly surpasses that of their local doctoral graduates.However,individuals with solely overseas communication experience do not exhibit significant difference in terms of publication volume,academic influence,or degree of international cooperation when compared to those without any overseas experience.The findings provide a basis for optimizing the development and evaluation system for scientific and technological talents.
|
|
Received: 09 November 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]杨芳娟,刘云,侯媛媛,等.中国高被引学者的跨国流动特征和影响:基于论文的计量分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38 (9):23-37.
[2]马银琦,姚昊.学术履历对教育学者实证研究产出的影响研究:基于 2015—2019 年核心作者的分析[J].中国高教研究,2020 (9):73-79.
[3]张杰,郭岚.教师海外经历与科研产出的关系研究:基于OLS和PSM模型[J].山东高等教育,2021,6 (67):30-37.
[4]JONKERS K,TIJSSEN R.Chinese researchers returning home:impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity[J].Scientometrics,2008,77 (2):309-333.
[5]梁帅,李正风. “人才帽子”下的资本转换与再生产:中国海归科学家适应融入研究[J].高教探索,2021 (7):5-10.
[6]李文聪,何静,董纪昌.国际合作与海外经历对科研人员论文质量的影响:以生命科学为例[J].管理评论,2018,30 (11):68-75.
[7]CAO C,BAAS J,WAGNER C S,et al.Returning scientists and the emergence of China's science system[J].Science and public policy,2020,47 (2):172-183.
[8]SCELLATO G,FRANZONI C,STEPHAN P.Migrant scientists and international networks[J].Research policy,2015,44 (1):108-120.
[9]JIANG J,SHEN W.International mentorship and research collaboration:evidence from European-trained Chinese PhD returnees[J].Frontiers of education in China,2019,14 (2):180-205.
[10]孙清玉,梁美宏,李峰.工科海归学者科研合作行为研究:以H大学水利学科为例[J].情报探索,2021 (20):54-60.
[11]黄海刚,连洁.海外经历会影响大学高层次人才流动吗[J].教育与经济,2019,35 (6):63-71.
[12]徐娟,王建平.中国大学高层次青年人才流动的影响因素:基于5 类项目人才履历追踪的实证研究[J].现代大学教育,2021 (3):78-87.
[13]李峰,唐莉.海外经历能否加速职业发展:以长江学者为例[J].科研管理,2022,43 (1):192-199.
[14]LI F,TANG L.When international mobility meets local connections:evidence from China[J].Science and public policy,2019,46 (4):518-529.
[15]JONKERS K.Mobility,productivity,gender and career development of Argentinean life scientists[J/OL].Research evaluation,2011,20 (5):411-421.https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X13176484436177.
[16]LU X,MCINERNEY P.Is it better to《Stand on Two Boats》 or 《Sit on the Chinese Lap》? Examining the cultural contingency of network structures in the contemporary Chinese academic labor market[J].Research policy,2016,45 (10):2125-2137.
[17]覃日怡,蒋家琼.我国高校教师国际化发展研究:以部分C9联盟高校为例[EB/OL] (2018-04-12).https://www.sinoss.net/c/2018-04-12/557369.shtml.
[18]吴江,张相林.我国海外人才引进后的团队建设问题调查[J].中国行政管理,2015 (9):78-81.
[19]史兴松.高校海归教师归国适应情况调查研究:以北京高校为例的分析[J].华侨华人历史研究,2017 (2):1-9.
[20]李峰.海归学者的跨国资本本土化及其效果评价研究[J].华侨华人历史研究,2018 (2):26-33.
[21]蔡小静.科学基金的资助效益研究:基于科研合作的中介效应[D].杭州:浙江大学,2021. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
