|
|
|
| Research on the Influence Path of Science Popularization Effect of Large-Scale Scientific Installations ——A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on Fuzzy Sets |
| Li Surui1,2, Xie Qihui1,3 |
1. School of Law and Humanities,China University of Mining & Technology,Beijing 100083,China;
2. Sino-Danish College,University of Chinese Academy of Science,Beijing 101408,China;
3. Center for Crisis Management Research,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The public nature of large-scale scientific installations determines that they should not be limited to research in the fields of science and engineering,but should be the result of the development of the facilities shared by the whole society.So it is important to popularize education on the scientific principles and scientific connotations of large-scale scientific installations.The study intends to investigate the mechanisms of factors influencing the effectiveness of science popularization in large-scale scientific installations with a view to producing generalized results.The 13 large-scale scientific installations in Beijing,Shanghai and Hefei are case samples.Based on the holistic perspective and configuration thinking,the paper uses the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method (fsQCA)and selects five conditional variables,namely,geographic location,human resources for science popularization,the realization form of science popularization of scientific and technological achievements,multi-subject cooperation and science popularization publicity,to explore the multiple co-existing factors and complex causal chains affecting the effect of science popularization in large-scale scientific installations.The results show that:①The conditions act in an interrelated manner,and a single element is not a necessary condition for the good or bad science popularization effect of a large-scale scientific installation;②The geographical location and the realization form of science popularization of scientific and technological achievements are the core elements for good science popularization of a large-scale science project;③The realization paths for both good and poor science popularization effect of a large-scale science installation are 2 and have asymmetry.Based on the key role played by elements in each pathway,recommendations are made to improve the effectiveness of science popularization in large-scale scientific installations.
|
|
Received: 15 August 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]陈套.重大科技基础设施内涵演进与发展分析[J].科学管理研究,2021,39 (5):21-26.
[2]陈夕朦,郑念.浅析大科学装置科普功能的实现[J].科普研究,2015,10 (5):17-24.
[3]姚琳.河北省科普效果分析与评价研究[D].石家庄:河北科技大学,2009.
[4]全国政协科普课题组.深刻认识习近平总书记关于科技创新与科学普及 “两翼理论”的重大意义建议实施 “大科普战略”的研究报告 (系列一)[N].人民政协报,2021-12-15 (12).
[5]王妍.科普互动视频信息传播效果影响因素的实证研究——以B站为例[J].科普研究,2022,17 (3):26-37,106.
[6]汤宏,杨宠.微信公众号中健康科普文章传播效果的影响因素研究[J].中国健康教育,2022,38 (4):364-366,383.
[7]尹艺霖.基于ELM模型的医院微信公众号推文传播效果影响因素研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2019.
[8]周丹丹,陈瑾,张庆锋,等. “中国寄生虫病与热带病防控”微信公众号运营现状与科普效果分析[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2022,20 (2):117-121.
[9]叶娇慧.公立医院自媒体提升健康科普传播效果的策略思考[J].新闻研究导刊,2022,13 (10):183-185.
[10]谢起慧,李苏蕊,王薇.我国大科学装置科普化的模式探索:基于北京地区三类装置的比较[J].科技传播,2021,13 (7):29-31,38.
[11]王钰迪.浅谈科技馆如何推动科普高质量发展[J].发展,2021 (6):79-81.
[12]周海鹰,田甜,钱昊,等.浙江省科技资源科普化对策研究[J].科技通报,2018,34 (6):280-286.
[13]李媛.打通学术资源科普化 “最后一公里”——科研成果向科普资源转化的观察与思考[J].改革与开放,2019 (11):19-21.
[14]胡芳.关于加强科技资源科普化的对策建议:基于上海 “科研—科普”相关问题调研分析[C]//.科普惠民 责任与担当——中国科普理论与实践探索:第二十届全国科普理论研讨会论文集.2013.
[15]张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报,2019,16 (9):1312-1323.
[16]程建青,罗瑾琏,杜运周,等.何种创业生态系统产生女性高创业活跃度[J].科学学研究,2021,39 (4):695-702.
[17]查尔斯·C·拉金.重新设计社会科学研究:模糊集及超越[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2019.
[18]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017 (6):155-167.
[19]MACKIE J L.Causes and conditions-American philosophical quarterly[J].JSTOR,1965,2 (4):245-264.
[20]MAHONEY J L.Toward a unified theory of causality[J].Comparative political studies,2008,41 (4/5):412-436.
[21]BIRD Y,SHORT J L,TOFFEL M W.Coupling labor codes of conduct and supplier labor practices:the role of internal structural conditions[J].Organization science,2019,30 (4):847-867.
[22]GRESOV C,DRAZIN R.EQUIFINALIT Y:Functional equivalence in organization design.[J].Academy of management review,1997,22 (2):403-428.
[23]陈磊,杜宝贵.科技服务业何以激发区域创新 “一池活水”:基于中国内地31个省级区域的fsQCA分析[J].科技进步与对策,2022(7):1-8.
[24]张蕾,姜华.高校科技成果奖励政策的多重并发因果关系与多元路径:基于 “双一流”高校的QCA分析[J].中国高校科技,2022 (Z1):23-28.
[25]关于印发国家重大科技基础设施建设 “十三五”规划的通知 (发改高技〔2016〕2736号)[EB/OL]. (2017-01-11)[2022-04-17].https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/201701/t20170111_962219.html.
[26]SCHNEIDER C Q,WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences:a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge university press,2012.
[27]FISS P C.2011.Buildingbetter causal theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal,54 (54):393-420.
[28]方齐,谢洪明.科技成果转化政策供给与政策协调的组态效应[J].科学学研究,2022,40 (6):991-1000. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
