|
|
|
| The International Path of Data Regulation:Dilemmas and Solutions |
| She Jialiang |
| School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In addition to the different domestic regulations of various countries,the international regulation of data is also an essential link.As a result of the imbalance between data governance and free access to data,international path to data regulation have accordingly emerged with numerous problems that need to be recognized,reflected upon and addressed.On the basis of translating the types of international pathways for data regulation into trade,standardization and certification mechanisms,it is found that they are suffering from the dilemma of fragmentation,limitation increase and weakening.In the face of this situation,countries should look for a way out in three areas including “compatibility”and “interoperability”,modularisation and functional strengthening.China should also take this as a lesson to achieve a non-zero-sum game through different institutional arrangements in order to integrate into the circle of global data flows without regulatory decoupling.
|
|
Received: 05 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]WILLIAM A C,EROL Y.Data governance principles for the global digital economy[R].Washington D.C.:CSIS,2019.
[2]ANDREW D M,NEHA M.Regulating cross-border data flows in a data-driven world:how WTO law can contribute[J].Journal of International economic law,2019,22 (3):389-416.
[3]Article 15.8.KORUS FTA [EB/OL]. (2007-06-30)[2022-01-06].www.ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/korus-fta/final-text.
[4]USTR.The Digital 2 Dozen[EB/OL]. (2016-07-29)[2022-01-06].https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/Digital-2-Dozen-Final.pdf.
[5]Article 7.43,Sub-section E,Chapter 7.Free Trade Agreement between European Union and Korea[EB/OL]. (2010-10-06)[2021-12-06].http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/a2fb2aa6-c85d-4223-9880-403cc5c1daa2.0022.03/DOC_1.
[6]European Commission.EU Proposal for Provisions on Cross-Border Data Flows and Protection of Personal Data and Privacy[EB/OL]. (2018-07)[2022-01-06].https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/july/tradoc_157130.pdf.
[7]AARONSON S A.The digital trade imbalance and its implications for internet governance[R].Waterloo:CIGI,2016.
[8]SHACKELFORD S,RUSSELLl S,HAUT J.Bottoms up:a comparison of“voluntary”cybersecurity frameworks[J].University of California Davis business law journal,2015,16:217.
[9]CIURIAK D,PTASHKINA M.Towards a robust architecture for the regulation of data and digital trade[R].Waterloo:CIGI,2020.
[10]The APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR)System.Business[EB/OL]. (2011-09-21)[2022-01-06].http://cbprs.org/business/.
[11]CHANDER A,FERRACANE M F.Exploring international data flow governance:platform for shaping the future of trade and global economic interdependence[R].Geneva:World Economic Forum,2019.
[12]AARONSON S A.Data is different:why the world needs a new approach to governing cross-border data flows[R]Waterloo and London:the Centre for International Governance Innovation,2018.
[13]BOX S.Internet openness and fragmentation:toward measuring the economic effects[R].Waterloo:CIGI,2016.
[14]陈红娜.国际数字贸易规则谈判前景与中国面临的挑战[J].新经济导刊2021 (1):17-18. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
