|
|
|
| A Comparative Study on National Science and Technology Strategic Decision Modes of Artificial Intelligence Between China and the United States——Based on the Perspective of Multiple Decision-Making |
| Yue Kun1, Fang Chao1,2 |
1. Qiyuan Lab,Beijing 100095,China;
2. Lab for High Technology,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Accelerating the modernization of national science and technology strategic decision of artificial intelligence is the requirement to win global science and technology competition externally,improve governance level internally and regulate major risks under complex situations.Meanwhile,diversified decision-making is an important symbol and way to realize decision-making modernization.From the perspective of multiple decision-making,the research analyzes its role in guiding breakthrough innovation and regulating major risks from the time dimension,carries out the comparative analysis of China-US strategic decision-making system from the space dimension,and puts forward some suggestions on improving the multiple decision-making mechanism of Chinese.Firstly,it is necessary to enrich the suggestion channels,highlight the problem-orientation and international vision in the start-up stage.Secondly,enhance the level of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary decision support in the research and formulation stage.Thirdly,strengthen the multi-dimensional guidance of decision-making in key regions and fields,strengthen the prediction and control of major risks in the feedback stage.The above measures can better support the modernization process of decision-making in the strategic field of science and technology and improve the level of strategic decision-making in frontier fields such as artificial intelligence.
|
|
Received: 21 March 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]李忠尚.软科学大辞典[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,1989.
[2]樊钉.政府决策能力现代化[M].北京:国家行政学院出版社,2016.
[3]盛昭瀚,刘慧敏,燕雪,等.重大工程决策“中国之治”的现代化道路——中国重大工程决策治理70年[J].管理世界,2020,36(10):170-203.
[4]胡鞍钢.中国特色的公共决策民主化——以制定“十二五”规划为例[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,26(2):43-50,158.
[5]李存金,陈勇刚.重大科学技术工程综合集成决策机制研究——基于复杂系统理论[J].创新与创业管理,2014(2):19-28.
[6]卢广彦.重大工程决策失误与重大工程决策机制构建[J].中国科技论坛,2009(4):30-35.
[7]易花兰.中美官方科技决策咨询体系的比较分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
[8]邱丹逸,袁永.美、日、英三国科技决策咨询制度经验研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2017,32(5):25-32.
[9]陈振明,黄元灿.智库专业化建设与公共决策科学化——当代公共政策发展的新趋势及其启示[J].公共行政评论,2019,12(3):104-117,192.
[10]宋义平.探索专业组织决策的多元逻辑[N].中国社会科学报,2020-04-08(7).
[11]孔令朋.中国公共政策决策主体多元化与公民参与多样化的关系研究[D].太原:山西大学,2010.
[12]张铤.公众参与科技决策探析[J].自然辩证法研究,2019,35(6):45-49.
[13]徐选华,尹儇鹏,钟香玉,等.大群体决策理论与方法研究综述:问题与挑战[J].信息与控制,2021,50(1):54-64,74.
[14]王红,刘建辉.人工智能在决策支持系统中的应用与研究[J].微计算机信息,2005(3):177-178.
[15]沈传亮.改革开放以来中国共产党决策科学化演进与展望[J].中共中央党校学报,2018,22(2):23-32.
[16]高晓林,范宾扬.“两弹一星”工程的决策过程和历史经验[J].上海党史与党建,2020(11):3-8.
[17]朱增泉,左赛春.中国载人航天工程决策实录[J].决策与信息,2005(Z1):76-80.
[18]张钹院士:建立完备的人工智能基础理论[N/OL].(2021-06-10)[2021-06-10]https://www.eol.cn/rencai/202106/t20210610_2120830.shtml.
[19]盛智龙.发展京津冀区域军民两用技术产业对策建议[J].中国科技投资,2010(8):66-68.
[20]郭良.冷战哺育阿帕网[J].世界知识,2001(6):34-37.
[21]万军.战略性新兴产业发展中的政府定位——日本的经验教训及启示[J].科技成果纵横,2010(1):13-16.
[22]缪其浩.从洞察到谋略:国外科技智库研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2020.
[23]邱惠君,梁冬晗,李凯.欧盟人工智能立法提案的核心思想及未来影响分析[J].信息安全与通信保密,2021(9):92-99. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
