|
|
|
| Research on the Evolution and Optimization of Regional High-Tech Industrial Policy Since the Reform and Opening up——Based on the Policy Text Analysis of Fujian Province |
| Xi Jicheng, Zhang Liangqiang, Ma Mengying |
| School of Economics and Management,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Since the reform and opening up,Fujian Province has promulgated and implemented a series of high-tech industrial policies based on the reality of its own industrial development and under the guidance of relevant national policies,which has played a strong role in boosting the realization of the strategy of strengthening the province in scientific and technological innovation.The high-tech industrial policy of Fujian province is highly representative in the whole country.Combing out its evolution process and carrying out policy optimization research can provide reference and inspiration for other provinces.Over the years,Fujian province has played the role of talent cultivation,tax incentives and intellectual property protection policies,and has highlighted the talent agglomeration effect,strengthened intellectual property protection,and accelerated the accumulation of innovation achievements.A large number of high-tech enterprises have emerged,and the output value of high-tech has continued to grow,which has become the“booster”of economic and social development.At the same time,there are still some problems in high-tech industrial policies,such as weak flexibility in the use of tools,inadequate evaluation and feedback mechanism,and inadequate talent incentive policies.Therefore the paper puts forward some optimization countermeasures,such as innovating the use of policy tools,improving policy service system so as to promote the development of high-tech industries.
|
|
Received: 28 March 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]AYAAK I,GENTA K,VONKTAVEESUK P,et al.Development of high efficient L-lactate fermentation and P(3HB)biosynthesis for“lactate industry”,the new technology for post-petrochemistry[J].Kagaku kogaku ronbunshu,1999,25(2):136-142.
[2]DE WAEGENAERE A,SANSING R C,WIELHOUWER J L.Multinational taxation and R&D investments[J].Social science electronic publishing,2012,87(4):1197-1217.
[3]张同斌,高铁梅.财税政策激励、高新技术产业发展与产业结构调整[J].经济研究,2012,47(5):58-70.
[4]ERNST C,RICHTER K,RIEDEL N.Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development[J].International tax and public finance,2014,21(4):694-719.
[5]刘晓婵,王建新.基于灰靶理论的西南地区高新技术企业技术创新能力研究[J].科技和产业,2015,15(11):79-83.
[6]刘东杰,张长立.中国地方政府科技管理体制优化研究[J].广西社会科学,2013(10):125-129.
[7]王方.中国高新技术产业政策发展历程及趋势初探——基于1949年以来的高新技术产业政策研究[J].开发研究,2016(1):129-136.
[8]杨俊杰,易晓芹.中美高新技术产业创新政策比较分析[J].商界论坛,2016(3):266-269.
[9]童心,陶武杰.发达国家高新技术产业集群政策及其对中国的启示——以美日法为例[J].改革与战略,2018,34(5):111-117.
[10]任胜钢,李丽.发达国家政府采购促进高新技术产业发展的政策比较及启示[J].中国科技论坛,2008(3):135-139.
[11]吴琨,刘凯.中国高新技术产业科技政策的比较研究——基于北京、上海、江苏和浙江的政策文本分析[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,16(1):114-120.
[12]邓菁,肖兴志.高新技术产业高质量发展的财政扶持策略研究[J].经济与管理研究,2019,40(11):96-111.
[13]李中.改革开放40年中国高新技术产业发展实践与反思[J].经济体制改革,2019(1):103-109.
[14]宋娇娇,孟溦.上海科技创新政策演变与启示——基于1978—2018年779份政策文本的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2020(7):14-23.
[15]伍长南.闽台区域经济发展与深化经贸合作研究[J].福建金融,2012(8):11-14.
[16]王书华.海峡西岸经济区科技支撑现状与战略思考[J].中国科技论坛,2010(2):105-108.
[17]ESTRADA M A R,YAP S F,NAGARAJ S.Beyond the ceteris paribus assumption:modeling demand and supply assuming omnia mobilis[J].International journal of economics research,2008(2):185-194.
[18]张永安,耿喆.中国区域科技创新政策的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技管理研究,2015(14):33-38.
[19]张永安,郄海拓.金融政策组合对企业技术创新影响的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(2):113-121.
[20]张永安,郄海拓.国务院创新政策量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(17):127-136.
[21]丁刚,郭瑶瑶.区域“双创”政策工具的构成比较及实施效果评估——以福建省为例[J].太原理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(5):49-56.
[22]李嘉明,乔天宝.高新技术产业税收优惠政策的实证分析[J].技术经济,2010,29(2):45-49,73.
[23]李子彪,孙可远,吕鲲鹏.三类政府财政激励政策对高新技术企业创新绩效的激励机制——基于企业所有权性质的调节效应[J].技术经济,2018,37(12):14-25,75.
[24]吕明元,麻林宵.中国省域大数据与制造业融合测度分析——基于2013—2018年中国省级面板数据[J].技术经济,2022,41(1):88-100. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 4 
