中美与RCEP成员技术合作网络演化及稳定性研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (1513 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract China has a new opportunity to foster international technological collaboration as Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)is in force since Jan.1^st,2022.To improve Chinese technological impact,it is meaningful to compare technological collaboration of China and the U.S. with RCEP parties.We made a comparative analysis on the evolution of technological collaboration network between China and the U.S. with RCEP parties,and further identified key nodes and their collaboration modes based on complex network theory and PCT patents.Then empirical simulation via network attack was used to examine the robustness of the collaboration networks.The results showed the rise of China's technological collaboration with RCEP parties.However,there is still a large gap between China and the U.S. Both the networks of China and the U.S. are becoming loosely organized.Intermediary nodes are playing an increasingly important role in the network of the U.S. Among the most substantial nodes,universities and public research institutes,which function as key intermediaries,have wider range of partners while a large part of multinational companies has a higher degree of collaboration depth.The robustness of China's network depends on Tsinghua University,Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Huawei Technologies Co.,LTD.,which is generally weaker than the collaboration network of the U.S.

Key words： RCEP Technological collaboration Network evolution Network robustness

Received: 27 December 2021

PACS:	G306
	F125

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Teng Ziyou
	Zhu Xuezhong
	Hu Cheng

Cite this article:

Teng Ziyou,Zhu Xuezhong,Hu Cheng. The Evolution and Resilience of Technological Collaboration Network of China and the U.S. with RCEP Parties[J]. , 2022, 3(12): 169-178.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I12/169

[1]新华社.全球最大自贸区诞生,有何深意[EB/OL]. (2020-11-16)[2021-11-14].http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/article/rcep/rcepjd/202011/43617_1.html.
[2]全毅.全球区域经济一体化发展趋势及中国的对策[J].经济学家,2015 (1):94-104.
[3]陈子凤,官建成.国际专利合作和引用对创新绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2014,35 (3):35-42.
[4]邬爱其.全球化背景下我国集群企业的技术合作行为演变研究[J].科研管理,2008 (1):87-96.
[5]刘凤朝,马逸群.华为、三星研发国际化模式演化比较研究——基于USPTO专利数据的分析[J].科研管理,2015,36 (10):11-18.
[6]ZHENG J,ZHAO Z,ZHANG X,et al.International scientific and technological collaboration of China from 2004 to 2008:a perspective from paper and patent analysis[J].Scientometrics,2012,91 (1):65-80.
[7]甘静娴,戚湧,田琛.企业跨国技术合作中的知识交流冲突、领地行为与知识产权能力[J].管理科学,2020,33 (1):54-74.
[8]孙海泳.特朗普政府对华科技战略及其影响与应对[J].国际展望,2019,11 (3):78-97,159-160.
[9]仇朝兵.TPP协定对中美日韩四国关系的影响[J].国际经济合作,2016 (3):26-32.
[10]王彦飞,凌胜利.澳大利亚强化 “五眼联盟”合作分析[J].情报杂志,2021,40 (8):17-23,118.
[11]高伊林,闵超.中美对 “一带一路”沿线技术扩散结构比较研究[J].数据分析与知识发现,2021,5 (6):80-92.
[12]高伊林,闵超.中美与 “一带一路”沿线国家专利合作态势分析[J].图书情报知识,2019 (4):94-103.
[13]张弛.竞争性地区主义与亚洲合作的现状及未来[J].东北亚论坛,2021,30 (2):85-99,128.
[14]HUANG M,DONG H,CHEN D.The unbalanced performance and regional differences in scientific and technological collaboration in the field of solar cells[J].Scientometrics,2013,94 (1):423-438.
[15]ZHENG J,ZHAO Z,ZHANG X,et al.International collaboration development in nanotechnology:a perspective of patent network analysis[J].Scientometrics,2014,98 (1):683-702.
[16]刘云,闫哲,程旖婕,等.基于专利计量的集成电路制造领域国际技术合作特征研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39 (8):13-25.
[17]YIN C,GU H,ZHANG S.Measuring technological collaborations on carbon capture and storage based on patents:a social network analysis approach[J].Journal of cleaner production,2020,274:1-10.
[18]GUAN J,CHEN Z.Patent collaboration and international knowledge flow[J].Information processing & management,2012,48 (1):170-181.
[19]高珺,余翔.中国与 “一带一路”国家专利合作特征与技术态势研究[J].中国科技论坛,2021 (7):169-178.
[20]陈欣. “一带一路”沿线国家科技合作网络演化研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38 (10):1811-1817,1857.
[21]张明倩,邓敏敏.中国与 “一带一路”沿线国家跨国专利合作特征研究[J].情报杂志,2016,35 (4):37-42.
[22]张亚峰,李成龙,肖利.中国与瑞典专利技术合作研究[J].科研管理,2021,42 (5):133-142.
[23]YOON J,PARK H W.The unbalanced dynamics in Sino-South Korea scientific and technological collaboration:a triple helix perspective with insights from paper and patent network analysis[J].Asian journal of technology innovation,2017,25 (1):184-198.
[24]张晓京,于渤.开放经济条件下基于NTB指数的中国专利质量研究[J].财经研究,2012,32 (12):108-119.
[25]RUBINOV M,SPORNS O.Complex network measures of brain connectivity:uses and interpretations[J].NeuroImage,2010,52 (3):1059-1069.
[26]FREEMAN L C.Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J].Social networks,1978,1 (3):215-239.
[27]THORVALDSEN S,FLÅ T,WILLASSEN N P.Delta prot:a software toolbox for comparative genomics[J].BMC bioinformatics,2010,11:1-7.
[28]杨春白雪,曹兴,高远.新兴技术合作创新网络演化及特征分析[J].科研管理,2020,41 (7):20-32.
[29]GRAF H.Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators[J].Cambridge journal of economics,2011,35 (1):173-198.
[30]曹霞,李传云,林超然.基于新能源汽车的专利合作网络演化研究[J].科研管理,2019,40 (8):179-188.
[31]陈伟,周文,郎益夫.集聚结构、中介性与集群创新网络抗风险能力研究——以东北新能源汽车产业集群为例[J].管理评论,2015,27 (10):204-217.
[32]陈伟,周文,郎益夫,等.产学研合作创新网络结构和风险研究——以海洋能产业为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35 (9):59-66.
[33]ALBERT R,JEONG H,BARABÁSI A.Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J].Nature,2000,406:378-382.
[34]ZHOU H,ZHANG X.Dynamic robustness of knowledge collaboration network of open source product development community[J].Physica A:statistical mechanics and its applications,2018,490:601-612.