未来科技城共生创新网络发展机制——基于未来科技城的案例分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (1576 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract To figure out how to transform science park into science city,this paper proposes the symbiotic innovation network model of“innovation core-entrepreneurship core-service core”and conducts a comparative research on the development model of the four future science cities of China with multiple cases.The research concludes that the innovation core,entrepreneurship core and service core consist of three stages in forming the symbiotic innovation network relationship of science cities,leading to four mechanisms.①The policy-driven mechanism which serves as the driving force as well as the pillar and exists in three evolution stages.②The elements convergence mechanism at the initial stage.③The collaborative governance mechanism at the development stage.④The module integration mechanism at the symbiotic stage.The research points out that the symbiotic innovation network model provides significant insights for staff workers and policy makers who are dedicated to the development of science cities.

Key words： Future science city Symbiotic innovation network Evolution mechanism Development model

Received: 10 December 2021

PACS:

F061.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wang Yang
	Ge Yuanyuan
	Yi Gaofeng

Cite this article:

Wang Yang,Ge Yuanyuan,Yi Gaofeng. Research on the Development Mechanism of the Symbiotic Innovation Network of the Future Science City——A Case Study Based on the Future Science Cities[J]. , 2022, 3(10): 104-115.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I10/104

[1]National Research Council.Understanding research,science and technology parks:global best practices[M].Washington D.C.:National Academies Press,2009.
[2]中国共产党中央委员会,国务院.国家创新驱动发展战略纲要[EB/OL].(2016-05-19)[2021-05-03].http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-05/19/content_5074812.htm.
[3]严佳,王晋梅,王丽艳.城市高新产业园区创新效率及其影响因素研究——以北京市中关村科技园区为例[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(9):132-140.
[4]邹德玲,丛海彬.中国产城融合时空格局及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2019,39(6):66-74.
[5]CASTELLS M.Technopoles of the world:the making of 21st century industrial complexes[M].London:Routledge,1994.
[6]CHARLES D.From technopoles to science cities:characteristics of a new phase of science cities[M]//JULIE T M,BENNEWORTH P,PHELPS N A.Making 21st century knowledge complexes:technopoles of the world revisited.London:Routledge,2015:82-102.
[7]BLOOM J L,ASANO S.Tsukuba science city:Japan tries planned innovation[J].Science,1981,212(4500):1239-1247.
[8]JOSEPHSON P R.New Atlantis revisited:Akademgorodok,the siberian city of science[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997.
[9]PARK S C.The city of brain in South Korea:Daedeok science town[J].International journal of technology management,2004,28(3-6):602-614.
[10]BASURTO G L G.Tsukuba science city:between the creation of innovative milieu and the erasure of Furusato memory[R].RCAPS occasional paper,No.07-3,2017.
[11]ABDULKARIM A.Reviving the science city of Kista:from void spaces to a dynamic urban life[D].Sweden:Lund University,2021.
[12]SHIN D H.Regional innovation effects of technopoles of the world:the case of Sophia Antipolis in France[J].Journal of the economic geographical society of Korea,2020,23(1):110-123.
[13]GRONDEAU A.The competitiveness of innovation-based territories confronted with crises and de crises and deglobalization:the case of Sophia-Antipolis[J].Annales de geographie,2018,723-724(5-6):463-491.
[14]FOORD J.The new boomtown? Creative city to tech city in east London[J].Cities,2013(33):51-60.
[15]SUSSAN F,SLOBODA B,HALL R.Is there a path from sin city to tech city? The case for Las Vegas[M]//O'CONNOR A,STAM E,SUSSAN F.Entrepreneurial ecosystems.Cham:Springer,2018:153-171.
[16]NEMKOVA E.The impact of agility on the market performance of born-global firms:an exploratory study of the‘Tech City’innovation cluster[J].Journal of business research,2017(80):257-265.
[17]ANZOISE V,SLANZI D,POLI I.Local stakeholders' narratives about large-scale urban development:the Zhejiang Hangzhou future Sci-Tech City[J].Urban studies,2020,57(3):655-671.
[18]BURT R S.The differential impact of social integration on participation in the diffusion of innovations[J].Social science research,1973,2(2):125-144.
[19]LUNDVALL B.The learning economy and the economics of hope[M].London:Anthem Press,2016.
[20]FREEMAN C.Networks of innovators:a synthesis of research issues[J].Research policy,1991,20(5):499-514.
[21]RYCROFT R W,KASH D E.Self-organizing innovation networks:implications for globalization[J].Technovation,2004,24(3):187-197.
[22]CALIA R C,GUERRINI F M,MOURA G L.Innovation networks:from technological development to business model reconfiguration[J].Technovation,2007,27(8):426-432.
[23]DHANARAJ C,PARKHE A.Orchestrating innovation networks[J].Academy of management review,2006,31(3):659-669.
[24]CAPALDO A.Network structure and innovation:the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability[J].Strategic management journal,2007,28(6):585-608.
[25]YOON J,PARK H W.Triple helix dynamics of South Korea's innovation system:a network analysis of inter-regional technological collaborations[J].Quality & quantity,2017,51(3):989-1007.
[26]HUANG M,WANG Z,CHEN T.Analysis on the theory and practice of industrial symbiosis based on bibliometrics and social network analysis[J].Journal of cleaner production,2019(213):956-967.