|
|
|
| How Does Service Industry Opening Affect Manufacturing Industry GVC Upgrading |
| Liu Xinghan1, Dai Xiang2, He Qizhi3 |
1. School of Business,Wuxi Taihu University,Wuxi 214064,China;
2. School of Economics,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China;
3. School of Statistics and Mathematics,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract From the perspective of service elements entering manufacturing production process to promote manufacturing servitization,there are usually two channels for expanding the opening up of the service industry.One is to expand the opening up of the service industry,foreign service factors enter the manufacturing industry directly as intermediate inputs,the other is that the opening up of the service industry will reversely stimulate the development of the domestic service industry,which in turn promoted the entry of local service elements into the manufacturing process.What kind of role the above two approaches to achieve the servicization of the manufacturing industry will have on the global value chain(GVC)of the manufacturing industry needs further theoretical discussion and empirical analysis.Based on the revision of traditional theories and the formation of hypotheses to be tested,the empirical test results using China's empirical data show that expanding the opening up of the service industry as a whole helps to enhance the status of the division of labor in the manufacturing industry's value chain.The opposite effect.Specifically,the servicization of the manufacturing industry realized by relying on the input of foreign service elements is not conducive to the rise of the manufacturing value chain,while the servicization of the manufacturing industry realized by relying on the input of local service elements will promote the rise of the manufacturing industry in the global value chain.The above-mentioned research findings have obvious policy implications for how to rely on the expansion of the service industry to optimize the path for the manufacturing industry to climb the global value chain.
|
|
Received: 30 September 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]刘志彪.产业基础高级化:动态比较优势运用与产业政策[J].江海学刊,2019(6):25-32.
[2]谭洪波,郑江淮.中国经济高速增长与服务业滞后并存之谜:基于部门全要素生产率的研究[J].中国工业经济,2012(9):5-17.
[3]戴翔,宋婕.“一带一路”倡议的全球价值链优化效应——基于沿线参与国全球价值链分工地位提升的视角[J].中国工业经济,2021(6):99-117.
[4]李小帆,马弘.服务业FDI管制与出口国内增加值:来自跨国面板的证据[J].世界经济,2019(5):123-144.
[5]黄群慧,黄阳华,贺俊,等.面向中上等收入阶段的中国工业化战略研究[J].中国社会科学,2017(12):94-116.
[6]李成友,孙涛,焦勇.要素禀赋、工资差距与人力资本形成[J].经济研究,2018(10):113-126.
[7]戴翔,杨双至.扩大开放在畅通国内大循环中的作用——基于长三角地区的经验分析[J].当代经济研究,2021(4):75-86.
[8]马述忠,张洪胜,王笑笑.融资约束与全球价值链地位提升——来自中国加工贸易企业的理论与证据[J].中国社会科学,2017(1):83-107.
[9]裴长洪,刘洪愧.中国怎样迈向贸易强国:一个新的分析思路[J].经济研究,2017(5):26-43.
[10]戴翔,宋婕.“一带一路”有助于中国重构全球价值链吗[J].世界经济研究,2019(11):108-121.
[11]盛斌.中国开放发展面临的三大挑战[J].国际贸易问题,2018(1):4-5.
[12]张杰,郑文平.全球价值链下中国本土企业的创新效应[J].经济研究,2017(3):151-165.
[13]ANTRÀS P,CHOR D,FALLY T.Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows[J].American economic review,2012,102(58-84):412-416.
[14]刘斌,魏倩,吕越,等.制造业服务化与价值链升级[J].经济研究,2016(3):151-162. |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 3 
