合作本位理念下的个人数据安全治理机制研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1048 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This paper divides the existing governance concepts of personal data security into individual-oriented concept and data-oriented concept.The individual-oriented concept advocates the supremacy of individual dignity and rights,but it tends to intensify the antagonism between individuals and technology.The data-oriented concept advocates the free production and flow of data,but it leads to the antagonism between individuals and data.The two concepts result in zero-sum game because of the neglect of the essential characteristics of personal data security,including situatedness,mobility and superimposition.Existing regulations and technologies are still inadequate in addressing these characteristics.Therefore,it is necessary for the government,enterprises,and individuals to collaborate to straighten out the data value priorities,overcome the difficulty of responsibility identification,resolve value conflicts,and prevent technological risks.The collaboration-oriented concept of personal data security governance proposed by this paper is to return to the essential characteristics of personal data security under the premise of legal compliance,to remedy the limitations of existing regulations and technologies through collaborative governance among government,enterprises,and individuals,and to promote common development in the pursuit of security.The implementation mechanism of this concept includes communication mechanism,resource sharing mechanism and ethical mechanism.

Key words： Personal data security Collaboration Development Fairness

Received: 22 September 2021

PACS:

N03

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Cha Qiusi
	Cong Hangqing

Cite this article:

Cha Qiusi,Cong Hangqing. Research on the Governance Mechanism of Personal Data Security Under the Collaboration-Oriented Concept[J]. , 2022, 3(6): 165-171.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I6/165

[1]邵晶晶,韩晓峰.国内外数据安全治理现状综述[J].信息安全研究,2021(10):922-932.
[2]冯登国.大数据安全与隐私保护[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2018.
[3]中国信息通信研究院云计算与大数据研究所.数据安全治理实践指南(1.0)[R].北京:中国信息通信研究院,2021.
[4]洪海林.个人信息保护立法理念探究——在信息保护与信息流通之间[J].河北法学,2007(1):108-113.
[5]安柯颖.个人数据安全的法律保护模式——从数据确权的视角切入[J].法学论坛,2021(2):58-65.
[6]周辉.网络隐私和个人信息保护的实践与未来:基于欧盟、美国与中国司法实践的比较研究[J].治理研究,2018(4):122-128.
[7]梅夏英.在分享和控制之间数据保护的私法局限和公共秩序构建[J].中外法学,2019(4):845-870.
[8]丁晓东.论个人信息法律保护的思想渊源与基本原理:基于“公平信息实践”的分析[J].现代法学,2019(3):96-110.
[9]丁晓东.个人信息保护:原理与实践[M].北京:法律出版社,2021.
[10]WALLACE N,CASTRO D.The impact of the EU's new data protection regulation on AI[R].Washington D.C:Center for Data Innovation,2018.
[11]FLORIDI L.Information ethics,its nature and scope[J].ACM SIGCAS computers and society,2006 36(3):21-36.
[12]卢恰诺·弗洛里迪.信息伦理学[M].薛平,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2018.
[13]尤瓦尔·赫拉利.未来简史:从智人到神人[M].林俊宏,译.北京:中信出版社,2017.
[14]邬焜,王健.善:张弛于有序与无序之间——对一种简单以熵量为判据的荒诞伦理学的批判[J].自然辩证法研究,2017(8):108-113.
[15]李伦.“楚门效应”:数据巨机器的“意识形态”——数据主义与基于权利的数据伦理[J].探索与争鸣,2018(5):29-31.
[16]NISSENBAUM H F.Privacy as contextual integrity[J].Washington law review,2004 79(1):119-157.
[17]何渊.个人信息保护法与日常生活[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2021.
[18]康春荣,苏武荣.数据安全项目案例:存储与备份SAN与NAS容错与容灾[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[19]WEEKES S.Decode:Amsterdam and Barcelona share take aways from data commons pilots[EB/OL].(2020-01-29)[2021-10-18].https://www.smartcitiesworld.net/news/news/decode-amsterdam-and-barcelona-share-takeaways-from-data-commons-pilots-4980.
[20]LANGFORD J,POIKOLA A J,JANSSEN W.Understanding mydata operators[EB/OL].(2020-04-29)[2021-10-19].https://mydata.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2020/04/Understanding-Mydata-Operators-pages.pdf.
[21]高兆明.伦理学理论与方法[M].北京:人民出版社,2005.
[22]约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].何怀宏,何包钢,廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.