产学研融合的组织模式特征——基于不同主体主导的典型案例研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (35)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1155 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In recent years,the scale and forms of“industry-university-research institute”cooperation in China have been expanding.However,due to unclear organizational structure and unreasonable profit distribution,it is difficult for“industry-university-research institute”cooperation to achieve real integration,which hinders the improvement of innovation capacity and breakthroughs in key and core technologies.How to construct the appropriate organization mode to promote integration,and how to give full play to the advantages of government,research institutions and enterprises to break through the external environment pressure is the top priority.This paper constructs a structure-function static organization model analysis framework,and conducts a multi-case comparative analysis of four projects that realize the integration of“industry-university-research institute”.The results show that the constituent elements,organizational structure,resource integration,ecological integration,achievement distribution and industrial application in the integration of“industry-university-research institute”have common characteristics under the leadership of different subjects.This paper broadens the theoretical research on the organizational model of“industry-university-research institute”,and explores the relevant problem on the integration of“industry-university-research institute”,which has practical guiding significance for the future breakthrough of key core technologies and industrial application of the integration of“industry-university-research institute”in China.

Key words： Industry-university-research institute Integration Organization pattern

Received: 30 June 2021

PACS:	G322
	F273.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Jiayi
	Yuan Changhong

Cite this article:

Zhang Jiayi,Yuan Changhong. Characteristics of Organizational Patterns of Industry- University-Research Institute ——A Typical Case Study Based on Different Agents[J]. , 2022, 3(5): 71-80.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I5/71

[1]苏州.知识管理视角下产学研合作创新冲突分析与治理对策[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(24):64-70.
[2]张绍丽,于金龙.产学研协同创新的文化协同过程及策略研究[J].科学学研究,2016,34(4):624-629.
[3]王海军,祝爱民.产学研协同创新理论模式:研究动态与展望[J].技术经济,2019,38(2):62-71.
[4]邵进.产学研深度融合的探索与思考——基于三重螺旋模型的分析[J].中国高校科技,2015(8):7-9.
[5]于良.进一步完善产学研深度融合组织机制[J].中国科技论坛,2020(7):8-9.
[6]张羽飞,原长弘,王涛,等.产学研深度融合演化路径分析——基于浙江清华长三角研究院的纵向案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020(7):87-98.
[7]刘洪民.协同创新背景下中国产业共性技术研发组织模式创新[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(13):59-66.
[8]付苗,张雷勇,冯锋.产业技术创新战略联盟组织模式研究——以TD产业技术创新战略联盟为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013(1):31-38.
[9]王章豹,韩依洲,洪天求.产学研协同创新组织模式及其优劣势分析[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(2):24-29.
[10]LEYDESDORFF L,ETZKOWITZ H.Emergence of a triple helix of university—industry—government relations[J].Science and public policy,1996,23(5):279-286.
[11]CARAYANNIS E G,ALEXANDER J,IOANNIDIS A.Leveraging knowledge,learning,and innovation in forming strategic government-university-industry(GUI)R&D partnerships in the US,Germany,and France[J].Technovation,2000,20(9):477-488.
[12]SIEGEL D S,WALDMAN D A,ATWATER L E,et al.Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms:improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration[J].The journal of high technology management research,2003,14(1):111-133.
[13]BROSTRÖM A.Firms' rationales for interaction with research universities and the principles for public co-funding[J].The journal of technology transfer,2012,37(3):313-329.
[14]何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式[J].科学学研究,2012,30(2):165-174.
[15]李永奎,乐云,张艳,等.“政府—市场”二元作用下的我国重大工程组织模式:基于实践的理论构建[J].系统管理学报,2018,27(1):147-156.
[16]刘刚.动态组织能力与企业组织的创新和演进[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2006(6):69-79.
[17]彭新敏,吴晓波,吴东.基于二次创新动态过程的企业网络与组织学习平衡模式演化——海天1971—2010年纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2011(4):138-149.
[18]孙笑明,陈毅刚,王雅兰,等.国家主导技术创新组织模式研究——技术创新选择视角[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(5):19-28.
[19]李久平,姜大鹏,王涛.产学研协同创新中的知识整合——一个理论框架[J].软科学,2013,27(5):136-139.
[20]乐云,李永奎,胡毅,等.“政府—市场”二元作用下我国重大工程组织模式及基本演进规律[J].管理世界,2019,35(4):17-27.
[21]毛基业,陈诚.案例研究的理论构建:艾森哈特的新洞见——“第十届中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2016)”会议综述[J].管理世界,2017(2):135-141.
[22]EISENHARDT K M.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of management review,1989,14(4):532-550.
[23]YIN R K.Case study research:design and methods[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage,2009.
[24]EISENHARDT K M,GRAEBNER M E.Theory building from cases:opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of management journal,2007,50(1):25-32.
[25]刘洪.组织结构变革的复杂适应系统观[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(3):51-56.
[26]LEE C L,YANG H J.Organization structure,competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance[J].Management accounting research,2011,22(2):84-104.
[27]杨阳,王凤彬,戴鹏杰.集团化企业制度同构性与决策权配置关系研究[J].中国工业经济,2016(1):114-129.
[28]臧欣昱,马永红.协同创新视角下产学研合作行为决策机制研究[J].运筹与管理,2018,27(3):93-103.
[29]何有良.上游垄断是否阻碍了中国制造业企业创新[J].现代财经:天津财经大学学报,2017,37(10):50-64.
[30]徐洁香,邢孝兵.企业垄断程度对创新投入的影响研究[J].财贸研究,2014,25(3):138-145.
[31]DOUGHERTY D,DUNNE D D.Organizing ecologies of complex innovation[J].Organization science,2011,22(5):1214-1223.
[32]HUANG H.The effect of the small-firm dominated ecology on regional innovation[J].The annals of regional science,2020,65:703-725.
[33]THOMÄ J,BIZER K.To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector[J].Research policy,2013,42(1):35-49.
[34]HORI T,YAMAGAMI H.Intellectual property rights protection in the presence of exhaustible resources[J].Environmental economics and policy studies,2018,20(4):759-784.
[35]KOBARG S,STUMPF-WOLLERSHEIM J,WELPE I M.More is not always better:effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level[J].Research policy,2019,48(1):1-10.