中国瞪羚企业科技创新能力影响因素研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (36)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1560 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In this paper the influence model of scientific and technological innovation capability of gazelle companies is constructed by DEMATEL model,and the influencing factors of scientific and technological innovation capability are studied.The study shows that the scientific and technological innovation capability of gazelle companies is mainly affected by technology,capital,management and environment.This paper makes a specific analysis of the 18 sub-factors contained in it according to the four conditions of influence degree,influenced degree,centrality degree,reason degree,and finds the deficiencies and structural problems of influencing factors of scientific and technological innovation capability of gazelle companies.The corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to improve the sustainable innovation capability of gazelle companies in the future.

Key words： Gazelle company Scientific and technological innovation capability Influencing factor DEMATEL method

Received: 07 May 2021

PACS:

F273.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Guo Yanqing
	Wang Huiling

Cite this article:

Guo Yanqing,Wang Huiling. Researchon the Influencing Factors of Scientific and Technological Innovation Capability of Chinese Gazelle Companies[J]. , 2022, 3(5): 31-39.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I5/31

[1]科学技术部火炬高技术产业开发中心.国家高新区瞪羚企业发展报告2019[EB/OL].(2020-10-20)[2020-10-20].https://www.chinagazelle.cn/report/detail/305d2b55f73944ddbfa1ff6386d54b0c.
[2]胡润研究院.胡润研究院发布《2020胡润中国瞪羚企业》[EB/OL].(2020-06-17)[2020-09-10].https://www.hurun.net/zh-CN/Info/Detail?num=C6560824CBCD#totop.
[3]长城战略咨询网.重磅！《中国城市新经济十大指标》在福州首发[EB/OL].(2020-09-29)[2020-09-29].http://www.gei.com.cn/schd/8073.jhtml.
[4]经济观察网.《瞪羚报告》发布|超2.5万家“瞪羚”企业在奔跑,代表中国经济新动能[EB/OL].(2019-09-17)[2019-09-18].http://www.eeo.com.cn/2019/0918/365820.shtml.
[5]Forbes China.福布斯中国发布高增长瞪羚榜单,速度与耐力较量中的胜利者[EB/OL].(2020-11-12)[2020-11-12].https://www.forbeschina.com/business/52292.
[6]王义新,孔锐.价值链视角下规模以上工业企业科技创新效率及关键影响因素研究:基于DEA-Tobit两阶段模型[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(3):136-142.
[7]VARGO S L,AKAKA M A.Value cocreation and service systems(re)formation:a service ecosystems view[J].Service science,2012,4(3):207-217.
[8]KNOKE B,MISSIKOFF M,THOBEN K D.Collaborative open innovation management in virtual manufacturing enterprises[J].International journal of computer integrated manufacturing,2017,30(1):158-166.
[9]陈伟,杨增煜,杨栩.科技型中小企业技术创新模式选择研究[J].学习与探索,2020(3):111-117.
[10]陈晓红,马鸿烈.中小企业技术创新对成长性影响:科技型企业不同于非科技型企业[J].科学学研究,2012(11):1749-1760.
[11]李晓锋,夏来保.中小型科技企业技术创新制约因素及创新策略研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(S1):96-98.
[12]王益锋,曹禺.科技型小微企业商业模式创新影响因素分析[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(18):13-17.
[13]马志强,范琳琳,李钊.新常态下科技型小微企业合作研发意愿影响因素及对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(24):76-80.
[14]NUNES P M,SERRASQUEIRO Z,LEITÃO J.Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs.high-tech SMEs[J].Research policy,2012,41(1):36-53.
[15]COAD A,RAO R.Innovation and firms growth in high-tech sectors:a quantile regression approach[J].Research policy,2008,(37):633-648.
[16]曹文才,单汨源.科技型中小企业持续创新能力影响因素[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,15(6):70-76.
[17]杜楠,王大本,孟华兴.科技型中小企业创新驱动因素研究:基于WSR-AHP分析法[J].经济与管理,2017,31(5):73-78.
[18]杜楠,王大本,邢明强.科技型中小企业技术创新驱动因素作用机理[J].经济与管理,2018,32(2):81-88.
[19]姜骞,刘强,唐震.创新网络关系治理对科技型中小企业突破性创新的影响机理——知识场活性的中介效应[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(12):78-84.
[20]TODTLING F.Technological change at the regional level[J].Environment & planning A:economy and space,1992,24(11):1565-1584.
[21]宋华,陈思洁.供应链整合、创新能力与科技型中小企业融资绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2019,16(3):379-388.
[22]KLAPPER L,RANDALL D.Financial crisis and supply-chain financing[J].Trade finance,2011,13(1):73-86.
[23]宋华,卢强.什么样的中小企业能够从供应链金融中获益:基于网络和能力的视角[J].管理世界,2017(6):104-121.
[24]DAI J,MONTABON F L,CANTOR D E.Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management:mediating role of top management support[J].Transportation research part E logistics & transportation review,2014,71:173-187.
[25]TZENG G H,CHIANG C H,LI C W.Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs:a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL[J].Expert systems with applications,2007,32(4):1028-1044.
[26]LEE H S,TZENG G H,YEIH W,et al.Revised DEMATEL:resolving the infeasibility of DEMATEL[J].Applied mathematical modelling,2013,37(10):6746-6757.
[27]SHIEH J I,WU H H,HUANG K K.A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality[J].Knowledge-based systems,2010,23(3):277-282.
[28]LIN R J.Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices[J].Journal of cleaner production,2013,40(2):32-39.
[29]赵东方,武春友,商华.国家级新区绿色增长能力建设影响因素分析[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(12):34-41.
[30]张琦,刘人境,杨晶玉.知识转移绩效影响因素分析[J].科学学研究,2019,37(2):311-319.
[31]张发明,王伟明.基于后悔理论和DEMATEL的语言型多属性决策方法[J].中国管理科学,2020,28(6):201-210.
[32]李西良,田力普,赵红.高新技术企业知识产权能力测度研究:基于DEMATEL-VIKOR的指数模型[J].科研管理,2020,41(4):270-279.
[33]孙伟.基于DEMATEL方法的新兴技术产业化融资影响因素实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(21):64-71.
[34]崔强,徐鑫,匡海波.基于RM-DEMATEL的交通运输低碳化能力影响因素分析[J].管理评论,2018,30(1):210-220.
[35]汤乐明,刘润达,胡睿,等.基于DEMATEL方法的北京市科普基地评价及发展思路研究[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(3):97-103.
[36]岳洪江.社会科学知识转化利用关键影响因素[J].中国科技论坛,2019(7):181-188.