新冠肺炎疫情背景下全球博士后的合作导师支持与博士后发展状况

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (1292 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The relationship between postdoctors and their supervisors is not a simple student-teacher relationship,but it has certain particularities and its own characteristics.After the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic,the support of the supervisors for postdoctoral fellows is particularly important.It also brings new opportunities and challenges to the training and attraction of high-end talents.Conducted by Nature on “Global Postdoc Survey”,data of 6,982 full-time postdoctoral fellows in universities and institutions were collated and utilized to make an international comparison of the global postdoctoral training and development in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.The influence and its heterogeneity among different countries are analysed by means of OLS,ordinal logistic regression and path analysis.The findings show that the support from supervisors decreases the postdoctors' depression and anxiety,while increasing the satisfaction of postdoctors' work and career prospect via the influence upon supervisors' trust and satisfaction.Their support is more likely to make greater impact upon those who are infected by the pandemic.Particularly,the data from China and America imply that suitable strategies require to be taken that supervisors would support postdoctor not only on the work but also mental health.Meanwhile,the supervision would be focused more upon the support rather than instructions and orders with proper measures and suggestions.Some implications have been made to improve the postdoctors' development.

Key words： Postdoctor Supervisor COVID-19 pandemic Career development

Received: 11 June 2021

PACS:

G31

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Xiao
	Xie Ping

Cite this article:

Liu Xiao,Xie Ping. Postdoctoral Supervisors and Postdoctors' Development in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. , 2022, 3(4): 120-127.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I4/120

[1]张爱莉.博士后培养过程质量控制关键要素研究[J].中国地质大学学报,2013 (3):152-155.
[2]张成.我国博士后技术创新的区域差异及影响因素分析[J].中州学刊,2018 (5):86-90.
[3]曾明彬.博士后培养国际化:现状,目标与举措[J].清华大学教育研究,2013 (2):120-124.
[4]国务院办公厅.关于改革完善博士后制度的意见[EB/OL]. (2015-12-03).http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-12/03/content_10380.htm.
[5]姚云,曹昭乐,唐艺卿.中国博士后制度30年发展与未来改革[J].教育研究,2017 (9):76-82.
[6]史万兵,李广海.协同创新与博士后培养模式的重构[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2013 (6):24-27.
[7]姚锐.美国博士后制度:经验与问题[J].中国高教研究,2009 (11):57-60.
[8]SCAFFIDI A K,BERMAN J E.A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring,collaborations,networking and a nurturing research environment[J].Higher education,2011,62 (6):685-698.
[9]VAN D B M,FRUYTIER B,THUNNISSEN M.Talent management in academia:performance systems and HRM policies[J].Human resource management journal,2013,23 (2):180-195.
[10]DORENKAMP I,WEI E E.What makes them leave? A path model of postdocs' intentions to leave academia[J].High education,2018,75 (3):747-767.
[11]FITZENBERGER B,LEUSCHNER U.Up or out:research incentives and career prospects of postdocs in Germany[J].German economic review,2013,15 (2):287-328.
[12]沈文钦,许丹东.优秀的冒险者:中国博士后的职业选择与职业路径分析[J].中国高教研究,2021 (5):70-78.
[13]SMALL G.The postdoc dilemma[J].Nature,2012 (483):235.
[14]汪传艳,任超.博士后工作满意度影响因素的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2016 (21):41-46.
[15]SMAGLIK P.Stress management:universities take a look at postdocs' mental-health issues[M].New York:Nature Publishing Group,2006.
[16]KAPLAN K.Postdoc or not[J].Nature,2012 (483):499-500.
[17]SINGER M.Enhancing the postdoctoral experience[J].Issues in science and technology,2000,17 (1):43-46.
[18]PAUL S.Stress management:universities take a look at postdocs' mental-health issues[J].Nature,2006,439 (7076):629.
[19]GLORIA C T,STEINHARDT M A.Flourishing,languishing,and depressed postdoctoral fellows:differences in stress, anxiety,and depressive symptoms[J].Journal of postdoctoral affairs,2013,3(1):1-9.
[20]VAN B B,VAN A P,VAN D W I,et al.Determinants of success in academic careers[J].Higher education policy,2012,25 (3):313-334.
[21]VAN D W I,BELDER R,VAN A P,et al.How do young tenured professors benefit from a mentor? Effects on management,motivation and performance[J].Higher education,2015,69 (2):275-287.
[22]赵硕.西班牙博士后培养模式研究[J].中国高等教育,2016 (13):76-78.
[23]BROSI P,WELPE I M.Employer branding for universities:what attracts international postdocs[J].Journal of business economics,2015,85 (7):817-850.
[24]汪健,邓芳.博士后制度的再起航:清华大学的探索[J].清华大学教育研究,2012 (5):69-73.
[25]范德尚.美国博士后调查及其对中国的借鉴意义[J].首都师范大学学报 (社会科学版),2010 (1):152-156.
[26]SCAFFIDI A K,BERMAN J E.A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring,collaborations,networking and a nurturing research environment[J].Higher education,2011,62 (6):685-698.
[27]蓝国秋,丁纪平.博士后研究人员在站科研工作的考核与评价方法研究[J].学位与研究生教育,2000 (4):67-69.
[28]范德尚.中美博士后培养事业的比较分析[J].学术界,2010 (3):217-223.
[29]胡微微,祝怀新.美国科学荣誉学会的 “博士后教育调查”解读[J].比较教育研究,2009 (4):33-36.
[30]彭晓娇.人文社科类博士后学术发展及其影响因素研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2020.
[31]姚云.美国博士后制度的特点及其启示[J].教育研究,2009 (12):85-90.
[32]徐东波.论博士后角色冲突:理论·诱因·调适[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (11):164-171.
[33]丁建洋.博士后与合作导师交往理性的生成、发展及优化[J].大学教育科学,2019 (2):72-76,92.
[34]范国睿.后大流行时代的教育生态重建[J].复旦教育论坛,2020 (4):12-28.
[35]黄园淅.中国博士后政策变迁的历史与特点分析——基于政策量化分析的研究[J].中国科技论坛,2018 (2):145-153.
[36]柳卸林,邢新主,陈颖.学术环境对博士后科研创新能力的影响[J].科学学研究,2009 (1):66-73.