面向协同对象的智能网联汽车产业创新产出研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (1273 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract With the increase of technology complexity and interdisciplinarity,collaborative innovation has become an important way to improve innovation output.This paper constructs a patent quality evaluation model and an innovation type evaluation model,and takes research on innovation output oriented towards collaboration partners which based on Chinese authorized invention patents from 2000 to 2020 in the field of intelligent connected vehicle.The results are as follows.In terms of innovation quantity,collaborative innovation network among the industry becomes increasingly closer,and the number of collaborative innovation increased significantly.In terms of innovation quality,collaborative innovation has a positive influence on innovation quality,and the collaboration among enterprise with college has a higher enhancement on innovation quality than that within enterprises or colleges.Radical innovation should be chosen when the cooperation is between enterprise with college,while incremental innovation should be chosen when the cooperation is within enterprises or colleges.

Key words： Collaboration partner Innovation type Patent quality Binary innovation Intelligent connected vehicle

Received: 11 May 2021

PACS:

F273.7

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Guo Qing
	Qi Yong
	Wu Lanfen

Cite this article:

Guo Qing,Qi Yong,Wu Lanfen. Research on Intelligent Connected Vehicle Industry Innovation Output Oriented Towards Collaboration Partners[J]. , 2022, 3(4): 99-108.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I4/99

[1]高伟,柳卸林.嵌入全球产业链对中国新兴产业突破性创新的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34 (11):31-42.
[2]NIETO M J,SANTAMARIA L.The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation[J].Technovation,2007,27 (6/7):367-377.
[3]陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012,30 (2):161-164.
[4]徐刚,杨超.基于演化博弈分析的产学研协同创新引导模式优化与选择[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32 (1):123-133.
[5]胡峰,袭讯,黄登峰,等.协同创新知识溢出风险管理框架:表征与认知[J].科学学研究,2020,38 (6):1048-1056.
[6]SZÜCS F.Research subsidies,industry-university cooperation and innovation[J].Research policy,2018,47 (7):1256-1266.
[7]蒋兴华,范心雨,汪玲芳.伙伴关系、协同意愿对协同创新绩效的影响研究:基于政府支持的调节作用[J].中国科技论坛,2021 (2):9-16.
[8]方刚,谈佳馨.互联网环境下产学研协同创新的知识增值研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38 (7):1325-1337.
[9]陈怀超,张晶,费玉婷.制度支持是否促进了产学研协同创新——企业吸收能力的调节作用和产学研合作紧密度的中介作用[J].科研管理,2020,41 (3):1-11.
[10]AMBOS T C,MÄKELÄK,BIRKINSHAW J,et al.When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions[J].Journal of management studies,2008,45 (8):1424-1447.
[11]刘和东,陈文潇.资源互补与行为协同提升合作绩效的黑箱解构:以高新技术企业为对象的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2020,38 (10):1847-1857.
[12]程聪.中国企业跨国并购后组织整合制度逻辑变革研究:混合逻辑的视角[J].管理世界,2020,36 (12):127-145.
[13]刘斌,唐慧敏,王玉凤,等.地理接近性对高校技术创新合作及创新绩效的影响[J].研究与发展管理,2016,28 (1):121-131.
[14]沈蕾娜.世界一流大学之间的协同创新:以哈佛大学和麻省理工学院的跨校合作为例[J].中国高教研究,2019 (2):21-26.
[15]谭云清,马永生.OFDI企业双元网络与双元创新:跨界搜索的调节效应[J].科研管理,2020,41 (9):170-177.
[16]梁杰,谢恩,邵鹏.多类型伙伴研发合作对企业双元创新绩效影响的比较研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (4):103-110.
[17]李国强,孙遇春,胡文安.嵌入式合作网络要素如何影响企业双元创新:基于fsQCA方法的比较研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40 (12):70-83.
[18]徐露允,曾德明,李健.知识网络中心势、知识多元化对企业二元式创新绩效的影响[J].管理学报,2017,14 (2):221-228.
[19]LEEUW T D,LOKSHIN B,DUYSTERS G.Returns to alliance portfolio diversity:the relative effects of partner diversity on firm's innovative performance and productivity[J].Journal of business research,2014,67 (9):1839-1849.
[20]ZHANG F,WANG Y,LI D,et al.Configurations of innovations across domains:an organizational ambidexterity view[J].Journal of product innovation management,2017,34 (6):821-841.
[21]朱雪忠,胡成.专利是测度企业技术创新绩效的有效工具吗[J].科学学研究,2021,39 (8):1498-1503.
[22]ARTZ K W,NORMAN P M,HATFIELD D E,et al.A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D,patents,and product innovation on firm performance[J].Journal of product innovation management,2010,27 (5):725-740.
[23]蔡绍洪,俞立平.创新数量、创新质量与企业效益——来自高技术产业的实证[J].中国软科学,2017 (5):30-37.
[24]朱雪忠.辨证看待中国专利的数量与质量[J].中国科学院院刊,2013,28 (4):435-441.
[25]MCKELVEY M,LJUNGBERG D.How public policy can stimulate the capabilities of firms to innovate in a traditional industry through academic engagement:the case of the Swedish food industry[J].R&D management,2017,47 (4):534-544.
[26]仲伟俊,梅姝娥,谢园园.产学研合作技术创新模式分析[J].中国软科学,2009 (8):174-181.
[27]CASSIMAN B,VEUGELERS R,ARTS S.Mind the gap:capturing value from basic research through combining mobile inventors and partnerships[J].Research policy,2018,47 (9):1811-1824.
[28]JONES B F,WUCHTY S,UZZI B.Multi-University research teams:shifting impact,geography,and stratification in science[J].Science,2008,322 (5905):1259-1262.
[29]ARORA A,ATHREYE S,HUANG C.The paradox of openness revisited:collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators[J].Research policy,2016,45 (7):1352-1361.
[30]林春培,张振刚.基于吸收能力的组织学习过程对渐进性创新与突破性创新的影响研究[J].科研管理,2017,38 (4):38-45.
[31]朱雪忠,万小丽.竞争力视角下的专利质量界定[J].知识产权,2009,19 (4):7-14.
[32]宋河发,穆荣平,陈芳.专利质量及其测度方法与测度指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31 (4):21-27.
[33]PPRUD H D.Dulling the cutting edge:how patent-related policies and practices hamper innovation in China[R].Germany:University Library of Munich,2012.
[34]许鑫,赵文华,姚占雷.多维视角的高质量专利识别及其应用研究[J].现代情报,2019,39 (11):13-22,45.
[35]万小丽.专利质量指标研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009.
[36]KANG B,MOTOHASHI K.Academic contribution to industrial innovation by funding type[J].Scientometric,2020 (124):169-193.
[37]赵康.新兴产业创新机构的合作网络特征及政策意义:以车联网产业为例[J].中国科技资源导刊,2019,51 (3):54-65.
[38]鲁若愚,张鹏,张红琪.产学研合作创新模式研究:基于广东省部合作创新实践的研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30 (2):186-193,224.