科研众筹与公私合作

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (12)

Download: PDF (1099 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In China,the crowdfunding for scientific research is still lagging behind.There are two factors restraining the public from participating in the crowdfunding for scientific research:one is its risk-return characteristic and lack of economic returns;The other is the trust dilemma between the both sides of crowdfunding.The logic mechanism that triggers the trust dilemma is analyzed from two aspects:trust source and trust transfer.The externality of scientific research activities guarantees that the crowdfunding for scientific research and public-private partnership are compatible with each other.In the mode of crowdfunding for scientific research based on public-private partnership,the public funds can relieve the trust dilemma between the both sides of crowdfunding through lead-investor mechanism,thus encouraging the public to participate in the crowdfunding for scientific research.China should build a crowdfunding platform for scientific research in a government-leading manner.To attain the desired results of the mode,it is necessary to enhance the social credibility of the platform.To this end,efforts should be made to strengthen system construction,pursue specialized development,lay down project returns,disclose and make public relevant information.The mode of crowdfunding for scientific research based on public-private partnership has multiple positive effects on scientific researchers,government sectors and the public.

Key words： Crowdfunding for scientific research Public participation Trust dilemma Public-private partnership

Received: 01 July 2021

PACS:

F832.5

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Ge Qiming

Cite this article:

Ge Qiming. Crowdfunding for Scientific Research and Public-Private Partnership[J]. , 2022, 3(4): 27-36.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V3/I4/27

[1]SCHWIENBACHER A,LARRALDE B.Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures[J].SSRN electronic journal,2010.
[2]WHEAT R E,WANG Y,BYRNES J E,et al.Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding[J].Trends in ecology & evolution,2013,28 (2):71-72.
[3]徐晨飞,卢鸣明.青年教师科研众筹模式设计及保障机制探究[J].中国高校科技,2017 (7):23-26.
[4]陈强强.作为公众参与科学案例的科研众筹研究——特征、作用与问题[J].自然辩证法通讯,2019 (4):73-78.
[5]尹振涛,阎沭杉.利用众筹模式拓宽科研经费的筹集渠道[J].科学管理研究,2015 (6):101-104.
[6]张绍丽,郑晓齐.众包、众筹、众创——高校科研模式创新研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016 (6):20-25.
[7]刘钒,甘义祥,李光.科研众筹模式分析及发展对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015 (21):8-12.
[8]刘周颖,赵宇翔,巴志超,等.国际科研众筹项目的特征描述、主题分析及属性对比:基于Experiment平台的发现[J].图书情报知识,2020 (3):71-82.
[9]郭丽环,王伟,李春鹏.基于Web的科研众筹模式实证分析研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015 (13):13-19.
[10]夏鑫,宋荣娟,田晓楠.投资者利益保护、项目状态与众筹融资完成率[J].会计之友,2019 (10):90-96.
[11]杜俊娟,李姚矿.农产品众筹发起人特征对融资达成率的影响研究——基于信任理论视角[J].中国农村经济,2018 (3):15-28.
[12]蒋骁.基于信任的众筹出版用户支付意愿研究[J].科技与出版,2014 (5):18-21.
[13]韩树杰.自组织的五大特征——以北大1898咖啡馆众筹模式为例[J].中国人力资源开发,2015 (8):19-21.
[14]杨疏影.股权众筹平台的交流渠道监管——基于群体智慧理论[J].财经问题研究,2017 (10):57-62.
[15]方兴.领投人能促进股权众筹项目成功吗[J].中国经济问题,2017 (6):122-133.
[16]赵尧,鲁篱.股权众筹领投人的功能解析与金融脱媒[J].财经科学,2015 (12):28-36.
[17]王雪莉,董念念.中国式众筹的信任如何构建和演化?——基于水木客众筹行为的案例研究[J].管理评论,2018 (1):242-255.
[18]许亚斌,朱先奇,史彦虎.基于KMRW声誉模型的众筹模式信任机制研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2015 (24):38-44.
[19]戈岐明,孔繁成.基础设施公私合作 (PPP)模式的税收激励研究[J].理论月刊,2017 (3):119-123.
[20]VINOD N S.PPP from Asia and African perspective towards infrastructure development:a case study of greenfield bangalore international airport,India[J].Procedia-social and behavioral sciences,2014,157 (2):285-295.
[21]姚东旻,李军林.条件满足下的效率差异:PPP 模式与传统模式比较[J].改革,2015 (2):34-42.
[22]MARTIMORT D,POUYET J.To build or not to build:normative and positive theories of public-private partnerships[J].International journal of industrial organization,2008,26 (2):393-411.
[23]ROGER C M,JAMES H D,SCHOORMAN F D.An integrative model of organizational trust[J].The academy of management review,1995,20 (3):709-734.
[24]DAS T K,TENG B S.The risk-based view of trust:a conceptual framework[J].Journal of business & psychology,2004,19 (1):85-116.
[25]HERBERT W K,ROBERT E K.Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion[J].Journal of conflict resolution,1970,14 (3):357-366.
[26]廖以臣,刘意.在线信任及其前因后果研究的文献综述[J].武汉大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2009 (4):467-471.
[27]BELANGER F,HILLER J S,SMITH W J.Trustworthiness in electronic commerce:the role of privacy,security,and site attributes[J].Journal of strategic information systems,2002,11 (3-4):245-270.